Another Brandon Graham pick at 15? (ORIG POST: 2/9/2012)
#1
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:38 PM
#2
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:52 PM
You can bash the pick all you want, but the value was not bad. Now choosing to take him before Earl Thomas, go ahead and rip that to shreds. However, I will say one more time - Brandon Graham was good value for where we selected him.
#3
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:52 PM
REVICKHILLIS, on 09 February 2012 - 01:38 PM, said:
#4
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:57 PM
Sebo, on 09 February 2012 - 01:52 PM, said:
He's another undersized player. If you watched the draft that year, Mel Kiper and Todd McShay both thought Earl Thomas was the pick. The next two players taken in the draft are by far superior players. JPP and Earl Thomas.
#5
Posted 09 February 2012 - 04:11 PM
#6
Posted 09 February 2012 - 04:34 PM
REVICKHILLIS, on 09 February 2012 - 01:57 PM, said:
#7
Posted 10 February 2012 - 01:23 PM
#8
Posted 10 February 2012 - 01:26 PM
#9
Posted 11 February 2012 - 07:10 PM
He came into training camp and what happened? He blew people away. Even getting the better of Peters at times. Looked like the best solid pass rusher on the team. Appeared as productive as Cole in 1on1 drills.
Then came preseason. Played a bit against starters. Excelled. Didn't rack up the sacks, but got pressure consistently and played the run surprisingly well. Hugh Douglas said his play was giving him "goosebumps" with how quickly he got into the backfield virtually every play.
Start of the season he hurt his foot. Did not look like the same player. The difference was night and day. Anyone that watched him in preseason could see his explosion off the line wasn't there. So he got limited playing time as a result. And yet, by the week of his injury he had BETTER stats than JPP.
Tears ACL and has microfracture surgery (not a guaranteed recovery) on top of that. Plays virtually no snaps at all this season as a direct result before being held out the rest of the season to exercise "caution" with his recovery. He could very well be done, but that's not due to bad scouting.
Everyone who criticizes BG tends to have one thing in common: Ignorance.
It was a bad pick in hindsight, no doubt, but nobody could have predicted that. JPP had boom or bust potential but minimal production in college. 6 sacks his senior season vs. Graham's 10 and a half.
People need to shut up and quit whining about the pick. The Eagles have made some baffling picks over the years. To anyone who knows what they are talking about, this wasn't one of them at the time.
#10
Posted 11 February 2012 - 07:14 PM
Faunce, on 09 February 2012 - 04:11 PM, said:
In this league, DE will always be a more important position than Safety. Especially with the blueprint left by the past few Superbowl teams. Rushing the QB is key on defense.
#11
Posted 12 February 2012 - 06:13 PM
italianmafia23, on 11 February 2012 - 07:10 PM, said:
#12
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:06 AM
cmart102, on 12 February 2012 - 06:13 PM, said:
Agreed.
Not that he had much control over his injury either, but the result certainly doesn't match the potential.
#14
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:05 PM
cmart102, on 13 February 2012 - 10:26 AM, said:
I can definitely agree with that. However, I think it has been largely overblown. Jason Peters comes in overweight every year. I would imagine with a leg injury like BG had, he wasn't able to exert himself much in physical exercise. When he went to Michigan he started off close to 300 pounds. It seems to me his weight tends to go in that direction unless he works to keep it down. But he certainly doesn't seem to have any clue what would constitute a healthy diet, eating crunch berries for breakfast in the morning. I laughed at that while watching his training video for the combine, but when recovering from an injury like the one he had, good nutrition is very important for quick and effective recovery. It's something that is SEVERELY overlooked in sports and conditioning coaches I have listened to tend to relay information that is very outdated.
#15
Posted 20 February 2012 - 05:49 AM
Comparing him to JPP isn't really fair given JPP's health and opportunity, but he was a complete unknown that year, where Graham was proven.
#16
Posted 20 February 2012 - 07:37 AM
I see no reason outside injury that should keep him from turning into a 11 sack a year player who also amasses decent tackle #'s from the DE position. I truly believe he'll get there and I'm crossing my fingers he can stay off the trainers table. Would I have picked Earl Thomas at that spot?.....darn right I would have. When the Eagles passed on Thomas I was floored...., but that doesn't take away from me thinking Graham will be an impact DE.
Looking back, I would have taken Graham over JPP at the time as well. I think Piere Paul's great play is a surprise to most. He was the epitomy of "boom or bust." Graham was a much safer player to take at that position in the 1st round. I can't fault the team for making that decision even after the fact.
#17
Posted 20 February 2012 - 12:14 PM
REVICKHILLIS, on 09 February 2012 - 01:57 PM, said:
We needed both a DE and a S about evenly. We liked the 2nd round S's more than the 2nd round DEs, and that's the story to that.
#18
Posted 20 February 2012 - 01:16 PM
REVICKHILLIS, on 09 February 2012 - 01:38 PM, said:
#19
Posted 20 February 2012 - 04:09 PM
#20
Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:54 PM
#21
Posted 22 February 2012 - 04:21 AM
#22
Posted 22 February 2012 - 01:24 PM
italianmafia23, on 11 February 2012 - 07:10 PM, said:
The better part is that when this season rolls around, he will have an actual offseason to get used to the wide-9 when he's at 97+ % health. Him on the edge (he has all the moves, has power, and has the speed - when he's healthy) and a tackle by himself on an island, it's going to be a lot of fun to watch. I think he will be a close to 10 sack year (obviously with his knee holding up). It's also going to be fun to watch him take a snap here and there from the middle of the line.
If it weren't for the injury, I think he would have been very productive. I think the same thing for Allen (I fully expect him to really step up this year and wow the fans). Both were good value (from a scouting view) where we selected them. I think they both will be cornerstones. I was higher on JPP but BG was not exactly a bad pick either IMO. I think if you look at today, rather than when they were drafted, BG is a better fit for the Washburn scheme than if we had JPP.
#23
Posted 23 February 2012 - 07:55 PM
Sebo, on 09 February 2012 - 01:52 PM, said:
Because most EXPERTS said he was better suited for a 3-4 as an OLB. We already have one undersized DE in Cole. So why draft another? He's a BUST!
#24
Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:03 PM
igglesfan1968, on 23 February 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
That is on apr with 4/3 DE's
Dwight Freeney 6' 1" 260
Want more examples
#25
Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:04 PM
igglesfan1968, on 23 February 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
#26
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:18 PM
Nik Sneak, on 09 February 2012 - 01:52 PM, said:
You can bash the pick all you want, but the value was not bad. Now choosing to take him before Earl Thomas, go ahead and rip that to shreds. However, I will say one more time - Brandon Graham was good value for where we selected him.
#27
Posted 28 February 2012 - 12:57 AM
REVICKHILLIS, on 09 February 2012 - 01:38 PM, said:
just because you thought the eagles wouldnt draft graham doesnt equal no one thought the eagles would draft him, i thought there was a fair chance they would, i thought it would come down between earl thomas, JPP or graham and out of those 3 i liked graham the most, thought earl thomas was too small which he has shown to be and JPP was to raw and had injury concerns with his back. in retrospect jpp would have been a better pcik but then again graham had a better rookie year then jpp before he got hurt.
#28
Posted 28 February 2012 - 03:56 PM
eaglepride, on 27 February 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:
What did Derrick Burgess do with Oakland? (He missed two years with foot injuries)











