Will Keuchley be there?
#1
Posted 03 March 2012 - 01:41 AM
#2
Posted 03 March 2012 - 11:25 AM
#3
Posted 03 March 2012 - 01:05 PM
Not only is Kuechly not a Top 15 Talent, he is not even a 1st Round talent. You can find LB's like him in the 2nd-4th Rounds. Kuechly is a good College Player but not an NFL type MLB Stud. I need a Pure Stud with my Top 15 pick.
My pick would be Mark Barron, Saftey from Alabama = STUD!!!
#4
Posted 03 March 2012 - 02:25 PM
#5
Posted 03 March 2012 - 03:54 PM
Snipes, on 03 March 2012 - 01:05 PM, said:
Not only is Kuechly not a Top 15 Talent, he is not even a 1st Round talent. You can find LB's like him in the 2nd-4th Rounds. Kuechly is a good College Player but not an NFL type MLB Stud. I need a Pure Stud with my Top 15 pick.
My pick would be Mark Barron, Saftey from Alabama = STUD!!!
And Kojo, I like Reid, but i'm scared that you're right.
#6
Posted 03 March 2012 - 09:32 PM
polasek_609, on 03 March 2012 - 03:54 PM, said:
And Kojo, I like Reid, but i'm scared that you're right.
You must be new to the game of football. Kuechly "hits the hole" with NOTHING! I've watched plenty of games and highlights on You Tube. He is a DRAG DOWN linebacker DUDE!! We already have guys like him on this team (Casey Matthews). Maybe you are new to the game of Football so let me educate you. We play the 9 Technique. You need a MLB who can hit someone and have that man go backwards or stopped for no gain because we want to get into 3rd and long situations. Luke sounds like a great kid but he can't play MLB in this "D". He is a Speed Guy who counts on angles to get to the ball carrier. It's funny because he is fast but not very quick. Look at the tape and you will see. Not the highlights but the game footage. If Luke is your MLB, you better play alot of Tamp Two otherwise you are going to see a ton of 3rd and short. Luke isn't going to stop a ball carrier on 3rd and short and I'm not going to spent the 15th pick in the draft on a MLB that can't stop the run.
#7
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:26 AM
You think Keuchly counts on his speed? Your joking right? His speed was the one thing that everyone was concerned about(which he proved to be a non-issue when he ran a 4.58).
He doesn't fit the wide 9 system? Your messing with me again, ain't you? The wide 9 system depends on LB's being smart about which hole to hit against a run. If you over pursue like our LB's did this year, you get the same result we had. The wide 9 system depends on their LB's(along with the rest of the team) being able to play man-2-man coverage, and for a LB, Keuchly is pretty darn good at man-2-man coverage. There is nothing about Keuchly that says he won't fit the wide 9 system.
You think he can't tackle? Dude your really irritating my leg with all this pulling your doing. Last I checked he set NCAA tackling recordS! His sophmore year he set a record with 183 tackles, and his junior year he broke his own record as he racked up 191 tackles. He set the ACC career tackling record(within only 3 years) with 532. So to say he can't tackle is about as honest as a husband to his wife about his bachelor party.
You think he's in anyway shape or form a bad player? C'mon man, now your tearing my leg off, stop pulling it so hard. He was not only an all-american player in the NCAA, he was awarded the Butkus Award, the Bronko Nagurski Award, the Lombardi Award and the Lott IMPACT Trophy. He is a complete MLB. He will be one of the best NFL MLB's in the league for the next decade and then some. There's no way he stays in the draft past pick 15, and he damn sure won't make it to the 2nd round.
I'm sorry, I must have forgot. Who's the one that was supposed to be getting educated here?.......You say i'm new to football, I think it's pretty obvious who the newbie is here.
#8
Posted 05 March 2012 - 05:24 PM
polasek_609, on 04 March 2012 - 01:26 AM, said:
You think Keuchly counts on his speed? Your joking right? His speed was the one thing that everyone was concerned about(which he proved to be a non-issue when he ran a 4.58).
He doesn't fit the wide 9 system? Your messing with me again, ain't you? The wide 9 system depends on LB's being smart about which hole to hit against a run. If you over pursue like our LB's did this year, you get the same result we had. The wide 9 system depends on their LB's(along with the rest of the team) being able to play man-2-man coverage, and for a LB, Keuchly is pretty darn good at man-2-man coverage. There is nothing about Keuchly that says he won't fit the wide 9 system.
You think he can't tackle? Dude your really irritating my leg with all this pulling your doing. Last I checked he set NCAA tackling recordS! His sophmore year he set a record with 183 tackles, and his junior year he broke his own record as he racked up 191 tackles. He set the ACC career tackling record(within only 3 years) with 532. So to say he can't tackle is about as honest as a husband to his wife about his bachelor party.
You think he's in anyway shape or form a bad player? C'mon man, now your tearing my leg off, stop pulling it so hard. He was not only an all-american player in the NCAA, he was awarded the Butkus Award, the Bronko Nagurski Award, the Lombardi Award and the Lott IMPACT Trophy. He is a complete MLB. He will be one of the best NFL MLB's in the league for the next decade and then some. There's no way he stays in the draft past pick 15, and he damn sure won't make it to the 2nd round.
I'm sorry, I must have forgot. Who's the one that was supposed to be getting educated here?.......You say i'm new to football, I think it's pretty obvious who the newbie is here.
BURN!!!!!! Dude he is right. He isn't going to be around for the 15th pick, much less the 2nd round.
#9
Posted 05 March 2012 - 07:07 PM
#11
Posted 05 March 2012 - 09:00 PM
#12
Posted 05 March 2012 - 10:37 PM
JPL0720, on 05 March 2012 - 09:00 PM, said:
Well, we signed a 220 lb. practice squad LB today, so there's that.
And before everybody jumps in about it being a meaningless signing, I know that. But it is indicative of the type of player these guys have in their heads when it comes to the position.
#13
Posted 05 March 2012 - 10:40 PM
KOJO, on 05 March 2012 - 10:37 PM, said:
And before everybody jumps in about it being a meaningless signing, I know that. But it is indicative of the type of player these guys have in their heads when it comes to the position.
#14
Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:56 AM
JPL0720, on 05 March 2012 - 09:00 PM, said:
#15
Posted 06 March 2012 - 08:57 AM
#16
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:58 AM
polasek_609, on 06 March 2012 - 12:56 AM, said:
Are you really using his weak lame arse statement of "I need to do a better job" as an admission of mistakes he makes? Come on man, thats just silly. And for his "beasted" , beasted what? When is the last time we " beasted" in a playoff game? When is the l;ast time he "beasted" and won a Lombardi? He is an egotistical maniac and he is nothing except the last 5 years of being a failure.
P.s. If he drafts a LB in the first round I will be the most surprised person on the EMB.
#18
Posted 06 March 2012 - 03:42 PM
polasek_609, on 06 March 2012 - 12:56 AM, said:
How the F can there still be people who make these same excuses after 13 years? FML.
#19
Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:09 PM
I'm sorry that I actually think things through before I start hating on somebody, but it's not excuses when it's true. You all can talk about how much you dislike me because I defend Reid if you want to, but not one of you actually said anything meaningful to back up a reason to hate him. Reid has done everything but the 1 thing that matters most for us, won the superbowl. Other then that, he's done everything we could ever ask for, he has given us +.500 seasons basically every year, he has owned the NFC East, he has taken us to the playoffs more then almost every other team in the league within his tenure, he has taken us to the NFC Championship 5 times, he has won the NFC Championship, and he has taken us to the SB, but unfortunately lost by a field goal. So no, I'm not going to hate Reid. Yes, I do want to win the Superbowl more then anything, but no I don't hate Reid. It's obvious that we have a much better chance of winning the SB right now with Reid at HC then any other HC out there. Especially the head coaches that are on the market now.
#20
Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:28 PM
JPL0720, on 05 March 2012 - 09:00 PM, said:
#22
Posted 06 March 2012 - 05:44 PM
JPL0720, on 05 March 2012 - 09:00 PM, said:
No, but he should. This kid is the next generation of Ronde Barber meets Paul Poz! The kid is super smart, super instinctive, and proved he is the real deal with his stats at the combine. He was ABOVE average on all tests. Compare that with his collegiate stats and you have a kid that can lead this D for 10+ years to come. We will probably sign Dan Connor and call it good and go with a FAST DT (Argh!!!). Unless it's Poe at DT, I want NO ONE other than Kuechly!
GET IT RIGHT FOR ONCE ANDY!!!! Listen to the fans, the media, the critics...ignore your GUT instinct. That feeling is just a craving for another doughnut!
#24
Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:34 PM
#25
Posted 08 March 2012 - 10:11 AM
polasek_609, on 03 March 2012 - 01:41 AM, said:
There value of certain postions is completetly clear and so if they truly want a LB they will trade back or out of the 1st rd.
#26
Posted 08 March 2012 - 05:39 PM
egforever, on 08 March 2012 - 10:11 AM, said:
There value of certain postions is completetly clear and so if they truly want a LB they will trade back or out of the 1st rd.
#27
Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:25 PM
Snipes, on 03 March 2012 - 01:05 PM, said:
Not only is Kuechly not a Top 15 Talent, he is not even a 1st Round talent. You can find LB's like him in the 2nd-4th Rounds. Kuechly is a good College Player but not an NFL type MLB Stud. I need a Pure Stud with my Top 15 pick.
My pick would be Mark Barron, Saftey from Alabama = STUD!!!
#28
Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:27 PM
sacook817, on 06 March 2012 - 05:44 PM, said:
GET IT RIGHT FOR ONCE ANDY!!!! Listen to the fans, the media, the critics...ignore your GUT instinct. That feeling is just a craving for another doughnut!
#29
Posted 10 March 2012 - 08:19 AM











