Stevie Johnson deal
#1
Posted 05 March 2012 - 08:20 PM
Does this deal bring DeSean's expectations down a little?
I feel good about $7.5 million a year.
#2
Posted 05 March 2012 - 08:25 PM
#3
Posted 05 March 2012 - 08:25 PM
#4
Posted 05 March 2012 - 08:27 PM
#5
Posted 06 March 2012 - 01:05 AM
#7
Posted 06 March 2012 - 02:40 AM
I'm MORE worried about how much it will cost us to keep LeSean. Foster's deal is giving him like $8.5mil/yr average and LeSean is just as deserving of that as Foster.
#8
Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:17 AM
Agent23, on 06 March 2012 - 02:40 AM, said:
I'm MORE worried about how much it will cost us to keep LeSean. Foster's deal is giving him like $8.5mil/yr average and LeSean is just as deserving of that as Foster.
What does that even mean? What upside does Desean have that Stevie Johnson doesn't? And why did you put it in quotes? Do you consider alligator arming catches and shying away from contact an upside? Or perhaps it's an upside to run backwards on punts.
Let me guess, Stevie Johnson doens't take 78 safety's 670 yards deep.
#10
Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:41 AM
Jarhead1775, on 05 March 2012 - 08:25 PM, said:
#11
Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:42 AM
macgregor, on 06 March 2012 - 01:05 AM, said:
They did lift the tag off Simon and Trot, but that was because those guys were refusing to sign and were holding out.
#12
Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:43 AM
Player 1: 32 Games, 158 Catches, 2077 yards, 106 1st Downs, 17 total TDs
Player 2: 29 Games, 105 Catches, 2017 yards, 72 1st Downs, 12 total TDs
Which player deserves the higher paycheck?
#13
Posted 06 March 2012 - 08:26 AM
Krukslonelyball, on 06 March 2012 - 07:17 AM, said:
Let me guess, Stevie Johnson doens't take 78 safety's 670 yards deep.
#14
Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:29 AM
graysferry, on 06 March 2012 - 07:43 AM, said:
Player 1: 32 Games, 158 Catches, 2077 yards, 106 1st Downs, 17 total TDs
Player 2: 29 Games, 105 Catches, 2017 yards, 72 1st Downs, 12 total TDs
Which player deserves the higher paycheck?
How about you do the past 3 years for these players?
#15
Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:31 AM
#16
Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:57 AM
#17
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:23 AM
Boss Hawg, on 06 March 2012 - 09:57 AM, said:
I can agree that Jackson and Johnson are deserving of the same amount of money (no more than 8 mil//yr).
But you should be ashamed from not recognizing how much value Jackson is to this team.
No, he might not be elite like Andre Johnson. No, he might not catch 15 touchdowns a year.
But on a year where he didn't perform so well, the offense sputtered. It looked sluggish at times.
The point is, the better Jackson does in games, the better everyone else (receivers) around him will be also.
You cannot blame Jackson for being a one trick pony when the head coach is as stubborn as a mule.
Yes, he's the fastest on this team. Does that mean he goes deep every single play? Ask Andy.
#18
Posted 06 March 2012 - 02:08 PM
#20
Posted 06 March 2012 - 09:02 PM
graysferry, on 06 March 2012 - 07:43 AM, said:
Player 1: 32 Games, 158 Catches, 2077 yards, 106 1st Downs, 17 total TDs
Player 2: 29 Games, 105 Catches, 2017 yards, 72 1st Downs, 12 total TDs
Which player deserves the higher paycheck?
#21
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:05 PM
Krukslonelyball, on 06 March 2012 - 07:17 AM, said:
#22
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:14 PM
#23
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:50 PM
Milkman420, on 06 March 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:
Stevie Johnson is a diva. Just go ask any Bills fan about his touchdown antics











