22 replies to this topic

[christsmith99]

could the refs give any MORE call to ND?

The QB must have had 5 penalties that weren't called

[Rodney_Zero]

PAC 12 officials

[phillygrump]

You think ND got the benefit today? You should've seen the Ohio State Purdue game.

BS pass interference call put them at the 1. If anything it looked like offensive PI.

Popular teams get these gift calls way too much. Its like the NCAA protects their interests. Just horrible.

[SP]

phillygrump, on 20 October 2012 - 10:00 PM, said:

You think ND got the benefit today? You should've seen the Ohio State Purdue game.

BS pass interference call put them at the 1. If anything it looked like offensive PI.

Popular teams get these gift calls way too much. Its like the NCAA protects their interests. Just horrible.

It was the correct call in the Ohio State game, but only because the QB can't throw a fade pass correctly (he threw it way too far inside).  So basically the WR went from engaging the DB so he could have position to go back outside (where the ball should have been thrown), to being unable to get to the ball because the DB still was holding contact with him.

Lucky? Yes.  Stupid? Yes. Correct? Yes.

[christsmith99]

2 more huge plays get mysteriously called for nd....just saying

[Pegger]

Having gawd on your side is like using the most powerful steroid known to man.

[VmprBlood]

Pegger, on 28 October 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:

Having gawd on your side is like using the most powerful steroid known to man.

Guess the Jets and Tebow ain't God power then. LoL. They can't get a win for the life of them at all.

[phillygrump]

SP, on 26 October 2012 - 12:44 AM, said:

It was the correct call in the Ohio State game, but only because the QB can't throw a fade pass correctly (he threw it way too far inside).  So basically the WR went from engaging the DB so he could have position to go back outside (where the ball should have been thrown), to being unable to get to the ball because the DB still was holding contact with him.

Lucky? Yes.  Stupid? Yes. Correct? Yes.

It was not correct. The WR initiated contact and then came back for the ball and OSU got a gift. Again, the WR initiated the contact while the ball was in the air and pushed off. If anything its offensive PI or you let it go.

The jewel of the Big 10 was not going to be allowed to lose at home to Purdue.

Chalk up 2 more big penalties for them the next week against PSU.

Ohio State is the only Big 10 horse in the race and they can't even place. They are protected. Its a joke.

College football has become shameless

[SP]

phillygrump, on 28 October 2012 - 05:38 PM, said:

It was not correct. The WR initiated contact and then came back for the ball and OSU got a gift. Again, the WR initiated the contact while the ball was in the air and pushed off. If anything its offensive PI or you let it go.

The jewel of the Big 10 was not going to be allowed to lose at home to Purdue.

Chalk up 2 more big penalties for them the next week against PSU.

Ohio State is the only Big 10 horse in the race and they can't even place. They are protected. Its a joke.

College football has become shameless

Cry some more.  Who's your team that you're so worried about Ohio State?

Yes, I graduated from Ohio State, but I am a Michigan fan- since the day I was born.  If you can't understand what occurred and why it was called that way, then there's no point in arguing.  The refs never call PI on fade passes unless there is a blatant move that disrupts the play.  In this case, it was the DB not allowing the WR to get to where the ball was (poorly) thrown.  The DB didn't even attempt to go for the ball.  That's why it was Defensive PI- because the QB couldn't throw a proper pass.

[Shocker54]

That was one of the worst calls of the year on that PI

[Innocence096]

more gifts for Notre Dame I see

[NFLGimpy]

On the FG Pitt missed in the 2nd OT, ND had 2 players wearing #2 on the field. Should have been a penalty and a 1st down for Pitt.

FML. I can't stand how badly this game ended. There's no way these calls weren't intentional.

[seengreen]

christsmith99, on 13 October 2012 - 04:00 PM, said:

could the refs give any MORE call to ND?

The QB must have had 5 penalties that weren't called

Until you can show me no other team professionally or amateur besides ND that doesn't get the benefit of questionable calls at home, please STFU!

[ndirish5567]

NFLGimpy, on 04 November 2012 - 02:02 PM, said:

On the FG Pitt missed in the 2nd OT, ND had 2 players wearing #2 on the field. Should have been a penalty and a 1st down for Pitt.

FML. I can't stand how badly this game ended. There's no way these calls weren't intentional.

On a special teams play you're allowed to have whoever you want on the field, although I have no idea what Chris Brown - a wide receiver - would be doing in to block a FG. Elijah Shumate is 22, our safety.

Either way, you can have both side's personnel on if you want to on special teams plays.

So, that would have been Bennett Jackson (CB) and Chris Brown (WR).

I've never seen Chris Brown in on special teams before, but I'll take your word for it. Still completely legal.

[Pittfan03]

It's a penalty, so I don't know what you're saying.


http://www.csnchicag...?blockID=797683

http://espn.go.com/b...oaching-mistake

[noel]

Innocence096, on 03 November 2012 - 07:37 PM, said:

more gifts for Notre Dame I see

10-0.  Stop whining about the refs.  They are usually from another conference.

[christsmith99]

noel, on 11 November 2012 - 01:26 PM, said:

10-0.  Stop whining about the refs.  They are usually from another conference.

It is all good when it goes norte dames way, huh

[Shocker54]

Notre Dame will either lose to USC or KSU and Oregon will win out.

Notre Dame goes and gets smoked in whatever BCS game they go to.

[christsmith99]

Shocker54, on 11 November 2012 - 03:45 PM, said:

Notre Dame will either lose to USC or KSU and Oregon will win out.

Notre Dame goes and gets smoked in whatever BCS game they go to.

It is hard to play against nd and the refs too

[christsmith99]

ha, now they even get USC without Barkley....it never ends

[SP]

christsmith99, on 20 November 2012 - 07:29 PM, said:

ha, now they even get USC without Barkley....it never ends

You really are dense, aren't you?  Because the referees (what this thread is about- one that YOU created) and Notre Dame KNEW years ago Barkley was going to be the starting QB and a Heisman hopeful, yet he was going to have mostly mediocre games this year and sit this one out with an injury... right?

[Blindgreed1]

christsmith99, on 20 November 2012 - 07:29 PM, said:

ha, now they even get USC without Barkley....it never ends

It's a conspiracy!   GTFO of here with this crap.

[evilwaldo]

It was horrible how Western Carolina threw that game last week.

In fact, how about all the SEC teams scheduling patsies on the same week?