Evaluating Eagles draft since 2005
#1
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:44 PM
2005:
Mike Patterson 1st rd
Todd Herremans 4th rd
Trent Cole 5th rd
2006:
Jason Avant 4th rd
2007:
Brent Celek 5th rd
2008:
DeSean Jackson 2nd rd
2009:
Jeremy Maclin 1st rd
LeSean McCoy 2nd rd
2010:
Brandon Graham 1st rd
Nate Allen 2nd rd
Clay Harbor 4th rd
Jamar Chaney 7th rd
Kurt Coleman 7th rd
2011:
Danny Watkins 1st rd
Curtis Marsh 3rd rd
Casey Matthews 4th rd
Alex Henery 4th rd
Dion Lewis 5th rd
Julian Vandervelde 5th rd
Jason Kelce 6th rd
Stanley Havili 7th rd
2012:
Fletcher Cox 1st rd
Mychal Kendricks 2nd rd
Vinny Curry 2nd rd
Nick Foles 3rd rd
Brandon Boykin 4th rd
Dennis Kelly 5th rd
Marvin McNutt 6th rd
Bryce Brown 7th rd
Most of the former draft picks are out of football, but some are on other teams. 2012 draft looks good, but most of the former drafts, especially 2011 & 2010 have been flaccid.
#2
Posted 29 October 2012 - 08:19 PM
#3
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:36 PM
#4
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:46 AM
#5
Posted 30 October 2012 - 05:20 AM
#6
Posted 30 October 2012 - 03:45 PM
The Eagles win!, on 30 October 2012 - 12:46 AM, said:
rule #2- Never draft a college DE to SAM in a 4/3, esp when he weighed almost 265 LB's and was beyond stiff, ever wonder why he was great against the run and horrible in the pass game?, think "stiff"
joruz, on 29 October 2012 - 07:44 PM, said:
2005:
Mike Patterson 1st rd
Todd Herremans 4th rd
Trent Cole 5th rd
2006:
Jason Avant 4th rd
2007:
Brent Celek 5th rd
2008:
DeSean Jackson 2nd rd
2009:
Jeremy Maclin 1st rd
LeSean McCoy 2nd rd
2010:
Brandon Graham 1st rd
Nate Allen 2nd rd
Clay Harbor 4th rd
Jamar Chaney 7th rd
Kurt Coleman 7th rd
2011:
Danny Watkins 1st rd
Curtis Marsh 3rd rd
Casey Matthews 4th rd
Alex Henery 4th rd
Dion Lewis 5th rd
Julian Vandervelde 5th rd
Jason Kelce 6th rd
Stanley Havili 7th rd
2012:
Fletcher Cox 1st rd
Mychal Kendricks 2nd rd
Vinny Curry 2nd rd
Nick Foles 3rd rd
Brandon Boykin 4th rd
Dennis Kelly 5th rd
Marvin McNutt 6th rd
Bryce Brown 7th rd
Most of the former draft picks are out of football, but some are on other teams. 2012 draft looks good, but most of the former drafts, especially 2011 & 2010 have been flaccid.
K?
#7
Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:47 AM
#8
Posted 02 November 2012 - 04:07 PM
djbigf, on 02 November 2012 - 02:47 AM, said:
#9
Posted 03 November 2012 - 01:00 AM
#10
Posted 03 November 2012 - 08:13 AM
StevieLeftCollege, on 03 November 2012 - 01:00 AM, said:
#12
Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:58 AM
djbigf, on 03 November 2012 - 08:13 AM, said:
The problem with Gocong was JJ didn't play to his strengths, not that he lacked talent. We were dropping a 265 pound LB into coverage vs TEs instead of blitzing him. Biggest tactical mistake of JJ's career here. I remember the Patriots game when they were unefeated, and Gocong was one of the most impactful players because JJ used him as an attacking weapon. Gocong was a great run defender, a good blitzer, and terrible covering in space. So what did JJ do? Ask him to cover in space.
He did a great job playing to Dawkins' and Trotter's strengths, but he blew it big time with Gocong.
#13
Posted 12 November 2012 - 09:52 AM
Sure, they got starting WR and starting RB, but two problems with that:
1. The WR has shown to be a #2 WR at best, and an inconsistent, afraid, and weak WR at times. I'd rather have had someone like Hakeem Nicks as a WR, who has more size and more toughness. Or even Percy Harvin, who seems to be more explosive and versatile than Maclin. Or, perhaps instead of drafting another "toy" (WR) for the offense, they could have instead had Clay Matthews, who is one of the best defensive players in the NFL? Or a tackle like Sebastian Vollmer, who is currently one of the best RTs in the NFL?
2. The RB has shown to be one of the best in the NFL at times, but what is he doing now? And it's not because they don't give him carries - the Eagles are #9 in rushing attempts in the NFL. AND consider that RB is probably one of the least important positions in the NFL in terms of actual playoff success. Look at all of the Super Bowl and playoff teams of recent years. Most of them are in the bottom 16 in rushing, and the Super Bowl champ last year was dead-last. Most playoff teams and almost all Super Bowl teams do not have stud running backs on the roster, which highlights how unimportant the "stud RB" actually is. Instead of McCoy, they could have had Sebastian Vollmer or Phil Loadholt, and might actually have some O-Line depth to lean on right now. Or they could have drafted Mike Wallace in the 2nd round, and then taken a pass rusher like Matthews in the 1st round.
#14
Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:25 PM
#15
Posted 14 November 2012 - 12:47 AM
Morton, on 12 November 2012 - 09:52 AM, said:
Sure, they got starting WR and starting RB, but two problems with that:
1. The WR has shown to be a #2 WR at best, and an inconsistent, afraid, and weak WR at times. I'd rather have had someone like Hakeem Nicks as a WR, who has more size and more toughness. Or even Percy Harvin, who seems to be more explosive and versatile than Maclin. Or, perhaps instead of drafting another "toy" (WR) for the offense, they could have instead had Clay Matthews, who is one of the best defensive players in the NFL? Or a tackle like Sebastian Vollmer, who is currently one of the best RTs in the NFL?
Maclin hasn't become the dominating, explosive WR we were hoping for, but even in this craptacular season where the OL is non-existent and the QB play blows, he's on pace for 900 yards and 8 TDs.
Quote
Now you're trying to say McCOy was a bad pick?
Dude, we got arguably the best RB in the NFL in the 2nd round of the NFL draft. It doesn't get much better than that.
What is he doing now? Well, he's on pace for 1,400 rushing yards and 70 catches. If you're complaint is that the team sucks, there are literally 52 other players to talk about before McCoy.
Anyway, your hindsight drafting is ridiculous. Sebastion Vollmer over McCoy? Really? You'd make that trade?
#16
Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:41 AM
The Eagles win!, on 14 November 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











