NFL Helps the NY Giants Again
#1
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:16 PM
#2
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:22 PM
And how is this the NFL helping the Giants? Your threads just get dumber and more whiny.
#3
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:25 PM
#4
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:27 PM
wrestlevessel, on 01 November 2012 - 06:25 PM, said:
I had the Giants winning anyway. They're a little better, and they're home. Going on an hour and a half plane ride, (if even that long) is not going to make a difference.
Oh, and I don't think you know what jetlag is.
#5
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:29 PM
wrestlevessel, on 01 November 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:
They tried to find another hotel, none of them are able to accommodate them right now...stop being an f'ing moron.
#6
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:49 PM
#7
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:56 PM
wrestlevessel, on 01 November 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:
Just when I thought you couldn't possibly whine and act like more of a psychotic crybaby loser, you present us with this gem of a thread
SHUT
UP
#9
Posted 01 November 2012 - 07:28 PM
EagleJoe8, on 01 November 2012 - 06:27 PM, said:
Just incase you didn't know the Giants suck at home. They are the "Road Warriors." When they go far in playoffs it is when they play on the road. The Giants nearly lost to Tampa and the Skins at home.
#10
Posted 01 November 2012 - 07:54 PM
#11
Posted 01 November 2012 - 08:16 PM
wrestlevessel, on 01 November 2012 - 07:28 PM, said:
Nearly, but didn't. They're 3-1 at home. I wish the Eagles "sucked" like that.
#12
Posted 01 November 2012 - 09:30 PM
#14
Posted 01 November 2012 - 10:39 PM
#15
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:37 PM
#18
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:01 AM
"I hope we get some holding calls because they have gotten away with murder," Tuck told ESPN's Rachel Nichols on Thursday. "They've done a very good job protecting Ben (Roethlisberger) -- they don't hold on every play. But we've seen a whole lot of it."
http://espn.go.com/n...t-benefit-calls
And since Graziano's blogged something complimentary about the prince the other day and so his opinion is now apparenty "credible" with the front-running frauds again, here's his 2 cents:
"I guess, when something works, there's no reason to stop doing it. But I can't help but think that, for a group of people that likes to say "talk is cheap," the New York Giants sure do seem to enjoy a bargain."
"I just get a chuckle out of the idea that a team that claims its motto is "Talk is cheap, play the game" talks as much as these Giants talk."
http://espn.go.com/b...giants-go-again
#19
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:14 AM
Dawkins 20, on 01 November 2012 - 09:30 PM, said:
Wallyhorse also isn't a crybaby whiner. He comes up with crazy scheduling ideas, but he doesn't cry about stupid ish. This guy gives the impression he's 12 years old.
#20
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:04 AM
MightyJNC, on 02 November 2012 - 08:01 AM, said:
"I hope we get some holding calls because they have gotten away with murder," Tuck told ESPN's Rachel Nichols on Thursday. "They've done a very good job protecting Ben (Roethlisberger) -- they don't hold on every play. But we've seen a whole lot of it."
http://espn.go.com/n...t-benefit-calls
And since Graziano's blogged something complimentary about the prince the other day and so his opinion is now apparenty "credible" with the front-running frauds again, here's his 2 cents:
"I guess, when something works, there's no reason to stop doing it. But I can't help but think that, for a group of people that likes to say "talk is cheap," the New York Giants sure do seem to enjoy a bargain."
"I just get a chuckle out of the idea that a team that claims its motto is "Talk is cheap, play the game" talks as much as these Giants talk."
http://espn.go.com/b...giants-go-again
You've been not-so-mysteriously quiet and non-existent for the most part for the past 3 weeks, but you're calling others front running frauds? How convenient. This coming from the same guy who completely and utterly disappeared last season for the better part of 6 weeks while the Eagles were crashing and burning, and went totally anonymous on his login settings. Why? Because we were able to see that you hadn't logged in for 6 weeks. I wish I took a screen shot of it, but of course, you'll probably deny all of it like the lying coward you are.
You say enough to make yourself look stupid. No need to pile on some hypocrisy as well
#21
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:34 AM
#22
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:57 AM
wrestlevessel, on 01 November 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:
You are an Fing idiot dude...the flight from Philly to Florida is like 2 1/2 hours tops (from experience) so i would imagine the flight from Pitt to NY is an hour or less
just STFU and quit crying cause you sound dumb
#23
Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:27 AM
Gmen4ever, on 02 November 2012 - 09:04 AM, said:
You say enough to make yourself look stupid. No need to pile on some hypocrisy as well
his season is ending Monday night...he'll be gone fast enough...
#24
Posted 02 November 2012 - 10:40 AM
rich36, on 02 November 2012 - 10:27 AM, said:
Perhaps over 200 posts in the "past 3 weeks" is considered "not so mysteriously quiet and nonexistent"
And remember kids, never, ever argue with crazy people.
#25
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:02 AM
lorddevn, on 02 November 2012 - 09:34 AM, said:
Maybe because Pittsburgh is dealing with some of their own problems related to the storm. Granted, it's not nearly what the NY/NJ area is contending with, but they still had a substantial amount of flooding from what I understand. My first thought was moving the game to Pitt as well. I can only guess that they felt it wasn't a plausible move
#26
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:02 AM
MightyJNC, on 02 November 2012 - 10:40 AM, said:
And remember kids, never, ever argue with crazy people.
So after Monday night, I'll see you next mocking whomever the Giants draft next April?
#27
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:05 AM
rich36, on 02 November 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:
You're really giving the Birds no chance in the dome huh?
You do realize that the Saint's D is one of only a handful in the league that's actually worse than jersey's right?
#28
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:06 AM
MightyJNC, on 02 November 2012 - 10:40 AM, said:
And remember kids, never, ever argue with crazy people.
300 posts? Got any proof? They sure as hell haven't been in TATG, where you were more or less living before the Eagles' collapse.
Have you so completely run out of firable ammo that you've resorted to "Giants fans living on the eagles MB"?! Seriously?
You spineless, front running coward...
#29
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:10 AM
MightyJNC, on 02 November 2012 - 11:05 AM, said:
You do realize that the Saint's D is one of only a handful in the league that's actually worse than jersey's right?
NO CHANCE...
you are 3-5 right now...
Brees is going to light up your squad like you've never seen before...
Who you play next week? Better win that game because after beating the Steelers and Bengals, the Giants are gonna be 8-2
#30
Posted 02 November 2012 - 11:15 AM
rich36, on 02 November 2012 - 11:10 AM, said:
you are 3-5 right now...
Brees is going to light up your squad like you've never seen before...
Who you play next week? Better win that game because after beating the Steelers and Bengals, the Giants are gonna be 8-2
I dunno Rich. I think they'll give NO a little bit of a game myself. The Saints' D is almost invisible, but I do like your version better anyway
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











