12 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:27 AM
Really? 6 points in 58 minutes with this **** calling plays but when he takes a hands off approach and lets Romo do his thing they score 7 points in 2 minutes?
Jerry Jones why did you hire this clown?!
Jerry Jones why did you hire this clown?!
#2
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:05 PM
pretty much
I think Garrett might have the right stuff for a HC, but he absolutely is a brutal playcaller
I think Garrett might have the right stuff for a HC, but he absolutely is a brutal playcaller
#3
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:29 PM
I was rather satisfied with the outcome of the game. He can stay in Dallas for as long as he'd like.
#4
Posted 05 November 2012 - 01:11 PM
It's impossible to really know whether a coach is doing a good job or not at Dallas, especially as head coach, because Jerry Jones doesn't look like he'll ever allow a coach to really grab an organization by the scruff of its neck and run it the way he wants.
For example, is Jason Garrett allowed to bench an underperforming 1st round underachieving pick of Jerry's like Dez Bryant? Is Garrett allowed to fine players for missing meetings? Is Garrett allowed to pick a player HE wants in the draft? Etc..
Garrett might actually be a good coach(not play caller), but we'll never know as long as he's at Dallas, because he's not REALLY head coach, he's just a glorified offensive coordinator.
For example, is Jason Garrett allowed to bench an underperforming 1st round underachieving pick of Jerry's like Dez Bryant? Is Garrett allowed to fine players for missing meetings? Is Garrett allowed to pick a player HE wants in the draft? Etc..
Garrett might actually be a good coach(not play caller), but we'll never know as long as he's at Dallas, because he's not REALLY head coach, he's just a glorified offensive coordinator.
#5
Posted 05 November 2012 - 02:51 PM
The Baltimore Ravens were so lucky when Garrett turned down the Ravens offer to become thier Head Coach.
The Baltimore Ravens had to "settle" for the lesser John Harbaugh. Hinsight is always 20/20 but John has coached circles around Garrett 10 fold IMO.
I think thats proballt the best move/non-move that the Ravens have made since they fired Brian Billick IMO.
The Baltimore Ravens had to "settle" for the lesser John Harbaugh. Hinsight is always 20/20 but John has coached circles around Garrett 10 fold IMO.
I think thats proballt the best move/non-move that the Ravens have made since they fired Brian Billick IMO.
#6
Posted 05 November 2012 - 03:30 PM
I live around that area and ppl were all excited about the 2nd coming of god "Jason Garrett" then he turned down the Ravens down like you said. Then they hired John Harbs as thier coach and every single caller that called the sports talk radio blasted the ravens and said they were going to be 4-12 every season. they still had Kyle Boller as QB then also.
What a difference does 5 years make.
What a difference does 5 years make.
#7
Posted 05 November 2012 - 03:52 PM
He is MM
#8
Posted 05 November 2012 - 05:37 PM
Washington 34, on 05 November 2012 - 03:30 PM, said:
I live around that area and ppl were all excited about the 2nd coming of god "Jason Garrett" then he turned down the Ravens down like you said. Then they hired John Harbs as thier coach and every single caller that called the sports talk radio blasted the ravens and said they were going to be 4-12 every season. they still had Kyle Boller as QB then also.
What a difference does 5 years make.
What a difference does 5 years make.
#10
Posted 06 November 2012 - 01:39 AM
It wasn't the fact that Romo was "calling plays" that they scored as much as it was the Falcons couldn't substitute and guys like Abraham were clearly exhausted and couldn't get subs in. Mike Smith should have used one of his time outs on that drive, mistake on his part but he thought they might need them, I'm sure.
#11
Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:04 AM
Jerry Jones has been holding this team back since the last few years of Troy Aikman.
#12
Posted 06 November 2012 - 11:35 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











