Solomon, on 07 November 2012 - 09:21 AM, said:
The line is horrible, but we've lost 4 starters. What do you expect? That said, Vick makes the lines job harder at times and still threw a stupid pick six and fumbled. As bad as this OL is, Vick is just as bad as a QB. Good line or not. Last year he has a very good OL and still blew. Vick will not be back, should not be back.
C'mon, you can't be that stupid. You're seriously blaming Vick for a pick that bounced off of Celek's hands, and a fumble which he had pressure in his face at the snap of the ball, went to his right to avoid it, and got smacked by a rusher coming from the left ?
This is why there's no point in arguing with Vick haters.
TColeFan, on 08 November 2012 - 04:09 PM, said:
So a decimated OL is to blame for the entire season? Can you please stop with these threads?
Vick is a terrible QB. His flaws compound the weaknesses on Offense and that reason alone is why he needs to be benched.
Here's another idiot. Yes, a decimated offensive line to blame for the offensive struggles this season. I guess you don't think protection is that important.
bobbywizdum, on 07 November 2012 - 09:34 AM, said:
thats what we want to see. The line looked a ton better with vince young last year and foles in preseason this year. You don't think its any coincidence that the line has always looked bad no matter where vick has played?
And here's another one. They (the idiots) just keep coming. The line looked a ton better with Jason Peters and Jason Kelce last year, and with Foles against guys who are backups or not in the league at all.
How good did the Oline look against Seattle last year ?