Who woulda thought...
#1
Posted 08 November 2012 - 07:39 AM
Crazy considering the beating he's taking on a weekly basis.
#2
Posted 08 November 2012 - 08:36 AM
We run for 150 in a half of football and run 7 more times in the 2nd half
#4
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:00 AM
philly75, on 08 November 2012 - 07:39 AM, said:
Crazy considering the beating he's taking on a weekly basis.
Alot of people said if Michael Vick stays healthy and do not turn the ball over the Eagles will win games. Well that's not happening so maybe Michael Vick is not the real problem. Maybe it's the coach the one that's screwing things up.
#5
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:02 AM
#6
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:04 AM
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 09:02 AM, said:
I agree with that.
#7
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:05 AM
#8
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:08 AM
EagleJoe8, on 08 November 2012 - 09:04 AM, said:
#9
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:13 AM
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 09:02 AM, said:
is it heart or stupidity , either way both don't win games in the NFL . We need a skilled leader that can think on the go , almost anyone that made it through high-school can understand a playbook.
#10
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:19 AM
traffic80, on 08 November 2012 - 09:13 AM, said:
#11
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:21 AM
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 09:08 AM, said:
This is exactly why I would like to see us keep Vick for next year but only if we could reduce that monster contract to like 3 million instead of 15, and I would want a open QB competition with Foles, whom im not willing to bet the farm on. I want to rebuild that line in the off season with a high pick spent on a RT and a Center. After that we need a safety, perhaps we can trade or acquire a Dwayne Bowe to add some much needed size. Our new coach could then run the hell out of the ball and we finally have a big receiver that when the blitz comes it doesnt have to be a super accurate throw you can just toss it up and let him get it.
#12
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:27 AM
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 09:19 AM, said:
Shhhhheeet I been playing Madden fo d last 20 years. No but its not rocket science , if a dumb thug like Vick can pass it off like he can , anyone that can find these forums would be able .
#13
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:31 AM
traffic80, on 08 November 2012 - 09:27 AM, said:
#15
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:40 AM
#18
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:22 AM
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 09:02 AM, said:
The other thing Vick is playing for is a job and people will play very desperate when they know their job is on the line...If Vick continues to fail as he has done this year he will be out of a job and a huge chunk of that $100 million contract he signed and we all know even though his debt is mostly paid off he still needs that money to survive the rest of his life and no team is going to give him another huge contract like that with the way he is currently playing...So while some is heart, most is desperation.
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 09:08 AM, said:
#19
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:02 AM
lorddevn, on 08 November 2012 - 10:22 AM, said:
The other thing Vick is playing for is a job and people will play very desperate when they know their job is on the line...If Vick continues to fail as he has done this year he will be out of a job and a huge chunk of that $100 million contract he signed and we all know even though his debt is mostly paid off he still needs that money to survive the rest of his life and no team is going to give him another huge contract like that with the way he is currently playing...So while some is heart, most is desperation.
I hate this argument and find it stupid...QB's like Brady and Manning are so great for a reason, it's because they do more than just throw perfect passes or have "stud" receivers, they do things like read defenses and adjust the OL for blitz protection and audible...If you watch Manning for just one drive you will see him calling out numerous things, pointing out blitzes to his OL, shifting things around, Mannings OL hasn't been All-Pro or even pro-bowl his entire career, but he damn sure has.
#20
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:27 AM
lorddevn, on 08 November 2012 - 10:22 AM, said:
The other thing Vick is playing for is a job and people will play very desperate when they know their job is on the line...If Vick continues to fail as he has done this year he will be out of a job and a huge chunk of that $100 million contract he signed and we all know even though his debt is mostly paid off he still needs that money to survive the rest of his life and no team is going to give him another huge contract like that with the way he is currently playing...So while some is heart, most is desperation.
I hate this argument and find it stupid...QB's like Brady and Manning are so great for a reason, it's because they do more than just throw perfect passes or have "stud" receivers, they do things like read defenses and adjust the OL for blitz protection and audible...If you watch Manning for just one drive you will see him calling out numerous things, pointing out blitzes to his OL, shifting things around, Mannings OL hasn't been All-Pro or even pro-bowl his entire career, but he damn sure has.
#21
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:31 AM
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 09:02 AM, said:
#22
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:37 AM
terilyns, on 08 November 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:
we_gotta_believe, on 08 November 2012 - 11:27 AM, said:
#23
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:38 AM
#25
Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:54 PM
lorddevn, on 08 November 2012 - 11:37 AM, said:
#26
Posted 08 November 2012 - 03:01 PM
vic92353, on 08 November 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:
#27
Posted 08 November 2012 - 04:55 PM
we_gotta_believe, on 08 November 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:
Again stop basing your reasons on 1-2 games, the line play was not poor against Cleveland or Baltimore, we won those games because the D kept us in it and Vick turned the ball over 7 or 8 times, but lets discredit those 2 games because they don't follow your mold of the line causing all of Vicks turnover problems and inability to put the ball in the end zone.
And to answer our question I do not know if we win those 2 or not, because teams play Manning and Brady different than they play Vick...With Vick they try and blitz more often knowing pressure will force him to screw up, where as with Brady and Manning D's have to pick and choose when to blitz as D's know Manning/Brady will get the ball out quick and negate the blitz.
#28
Posted 08 November 2012 - 05:21 PM
time2rock, on 08 November 2012 - 08:43 AM, said:
What's so maddening about it? If the only way they could move the ball was on the ground and they just chose not to do it, that would be maddening. They ran for 150 and scored 3 stinking points in the 1st half.
They had 400 yards of offense and scored 13 points, If I hadn't seen it with my own eyes I would have sworn it wasn't possible. The problem isn't the playcalling. Their problem is that they're the same sloppy undisciplined team that they've been for years now.
#29
Posted 09 November 2012 - 09:26 AM
lorddevn, on 08 November 2012 - 04:55 PM, said:
Again stop basing your reasons on 1-2 games, the line play was not poor against Cleveland or Baltimore, we won those games because the D kept us in it and Vick turned the ball over 7 or 8 times, but lets discredit those 2 games because they don't follow your mold of the line causing all of Vicks turnover problems and inability to put the ball in the end zone.
And to answer our question I do not know if we win those 2 or not, because teams play Manning and Brady different than they play Vick...With Vick they try and blitz more often knowing pressure will force him to screw up, where as with Brady and Manning D's have to pick and choose when to blitz as D's know Manning/Brady will get the ball out quick and negate the blitz.
#30
Posted 09 November 2012 - 09:35 AM
we_gotta_believe, on 09 November 2012 - 09:26 AM, said:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











