Which WR Alligator Armed
#1
Posted 08 November 2012 - 08:48 AM
It but if your WR don't have any heart (I question the heart of both of those guys) their gonna make your QB look bad because their not going to run the routes they should be running, that pass should have been a score.
Right behind the OL and defensive backfield I'd be looking to upgrade those WR's, we nedd size and heart, no need for two wussies playng WR.
#2
Posted 08 November 2012 - 08:56 AM
EagleVA, on 08 November 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
It but if your what is this? WR don't have any heart (I question the heart of both of those guys) their they are gonna going to make your QB look bad because their they are not going to run the routes they should be running, that pass should have been a score.
Right behind the OL and defensive backfield I'd be looking to upgrade those WR's WRs, we nedd need size and heart, no need for two wussies playng playing WR.
D-, could do better.
see me after class.
#3
Posted 08 November 2012 - 08:57 AM
#4
Posted 08 November 2012 - 08:59 AM
EagleVA, on 08 November 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
It but if your WR don't have any heart (I question the heart of both of those guys) their gonna make your QB look bad because their not going to run the routes they should be running, that pass should have been a score.
Right behind the OL and defensive backfield I'd be looking to upgrade those WR's, we nedd size and heart, no need for two wussies playng WR.
not sure what pass your talking about but i'll take a guess and say Jackson he spent all of 2011 shortarming passes. Maclin just dissapears so probably wasnt him..
#5
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:02 AM
EagleVA, on 08 November 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
It but if your WR don't have any heart (I question the heart of both of those guys) their gonna make your QB look bad because their not going to run the routes they should be running, that pass should have been a score.
Right behind the OL and defensive backfield I'd be looking to upgrade those WR's, we nedd size and heart, no need for two wussies playng WR.
Let's bring back thrash and pinkston then...
Eagles fans are so Fing retarded when it comes to WR's...can't even remember the pre-jax and pre-mac days when we had absolutely garbage. The 1 WR we did have was the most selfish player in NFL history
#6
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:04 AM
#7
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:07 AM
Maclin's hit him in the forearm.
#8
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:37 AM
nottsfootballfan, on 08 November 2012 - 09:07 AM, said:
Maclin's hit him in the forearm.
#10
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:44 AM
#11
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:47 AM
birdgang21, on 08 November 2012 - 09:44 AM, said:
Maclin beats guys deep all the time. You can go watch the tape available online and see the zoomed out view where he gets open but doesn't get the ball. And the alligator arms was from Jackson, not Maclin. Maclin had a horrible pass thrown by Vick that no one would have caught. Cooper also had alligator arms on one play down the middle.
#12
Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:56 PM
#13
Posted 08 November 2012 - 03:59 PM
#14
Posted 08 November 2012 - 06:26 PM
i forget the djacc one but id have to watch it again. bujt there was no alligator arms.
#16
Posted 08 November 2012 - 06:55 PM
CMPunk you make pretty bold statements. Especially considering your one of those "Its not Vicks fault. Its never Vicks fault" type of guys. There are some clues out there that need to be had by you sir.
#17
Posted 08 November 2012 - 07:08 PM
FanSinceWayBack, on 08 November 2012 - 06:55 PM, said:
CMPunk you make pretty bold statements. Especially considering your one of those "Its not Vicks fault. Its never Vicks fault" type of guys. There are some clues out there that need to be had by you sir.
I think the Pittsburgh and Arizona losses are on Vick (he didn't play well in Cleveland either) but the last few losses cannot be pinned on Vick. Meanwhile the idiots here are screaming FOLEZZZ like that's going to change the fact that our O-Line is terrible and the fact that our defense couldn't stop a nosebleed. Adding on to the fact that defenses expect us to pass every down.
And no, I don't care about seeing FOLEZzzzz this year.
#18
Posted 08 November 2012 - 07:14 PM
CMPunk, on 08 November 2012 - 07:08 PM, said:
And no, I don't care about seeing FOLEZzzzz this year.
#19
Posted 08 November 2012 - 07:14 PM
CMPunk, on 08 November 2012 - 07:08 PM, said:
I agree not every game lost is Vicks fault, our D is playing terrible, and our Oline is depleted and slumping.
Vick isnt/cant get it done though. Pure and simple. There are alot of things that go into me thinking that way and Id love to break it down for you, if need be.
Are you one of the many who say " No one could play QB and have success under this O-Line?"
#20
Posted 08 November 2012 - 07:30 PM
FanSinceWayBack, on 08 November 2012 - 07:14 PM, said:
Maybe it wont change anything. I for one would rather see T.Edwards than Vick at this point. Am I an idiot?
I agree not every game lost is Vicks fault, our D is playing terrible, and our Oline is depleted and slumping.
Vick isnt/cant get it done though. Pure and simple. There are alot of things that go into me thinking that way and Id love to break it down for you, if need be.
Are you one of the many who say " No one could play QB and have success under this O-Line?"
Trent Edwards got booed in Buffalo. BUFFALO. Imagine what the genuises at the Linc in Philly would do.
And I think most of our woes begin with the coaches not the quarterback. Andy Reid's words are falling on deaf ears in that locker room and they have since we got rid of Donovan.
And yes nobody could play behind this O-Line. It's terrible. This team has completely given up on Andy Reid. The only guys out there giving maximum effort on a weekly basis are Shady, Celek, Bryce Brown (when he's playing), Ryans and yes Mike Vick. The guy is a warrior but Eagles fans don't care about that. They would rather just look at the scoreboard and assume it's the Quarterback's fault. This fanbase is very short sighted which explains why players constantly come out to the media to diss us. Where else do multiple players come out and insult a fanbase?
People here think that just a new quarterback will solve all of our problems but problems linger regardless of the quarterback. Look around the league and look at the young quarterbacks who are succeeding and the ones who aren't. Seahawks fans wanted a new QB last year but they completely overlooked the fact that none of their recievers could seperate from cornerbacks. Now, they have a new QB, that issue is still there and they have yet to win a road game this year.
That's just one example. This team has way too many other pressing issues to be worried about the Quarterback right now.
#21
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:08 PM
Solomon, on 08 November 2012 - 09:37 AM, said:
And all you sheep just repeat what the commentators said about being too high, but when you see the replay, it clearly could have and SHOULD HAVE been caught!
And all of Larry Fitzgerald's highlight plays are passes like that... up high, etc. difference is he's a guy who will go & get it! Maclin has no desire!
And there was a lot of that going on by all our "playmakers"... trying to catch with only one hand! Celek, Jackson, and Maclin all one handed a would-be touchdown! you can blame it on a bad pass all you want, but there is guys in the league who go get those every week!
#22
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:11 PM
#23
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:43 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
#25
Posted 09 November 2012 - 12:54 AM
EagleVA, on 08 November 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
It but if your WR don't have any heart (I question the heart of both of those guys) their gonna make your QB look bad because their not going to run the routes they should be running, that pass should have been a score.
Right behind the OL and defensive backfield I'd be looking to upgrade those WR's, we nedd size and heart, no need for two wussies playng WR.
it was more of a lack of effort...by Jackson though because of the position of the defenders, he may not have seen it clearly either chief.
#27
Posted 09 November 2012 - 01:47 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











