Foles against second stringers?
#1
Posted 10 November 2012 - 10:35 AM
#2
Posted 10 November 2012 - 10:43 AM
#3
Posted 10 November 2012 - 10:44 AM
#5
Posted 10 November 2012 - 10:55 AM
#6
Posted 10 November 2012 - 11:02 AM
pgcd3, on 10 November 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
#8
Posted 10 November 2012 - 11:58 AM
Shut the F up about how he looked already. That's the smallest damn sample size you can get.
#9
Posted 10 November 2012 - 12:39 PM
#10
Posted 10 November 2012 - 01:44 PM
SFlaIggleFan, on 10 November 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:
#11
Posted 10 November 2012 - 03:36 PM
SFlaIggleFan, on 10 November 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:
Makes...tooo....much.... sense.... AHHHHHHHH ITS A COMMON SENSE OVERLOAD!
#12
Posted 10 November 2012 - 03:39 PM
learn2reid, on 10 November 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:
Shut the F up about how he looked already. That's the smallest damn sample size you can get.
Yea...thats how BAD he was that he hardly had any game time...fool. idiots will never get it.
#13
Posted 10 November 2012 - 04:26 PM
FlyinBrian36-20, on 10 November 2012 - 03:39 PM, said:
Yeah, getting killed because the O-line couldn't block anyone really shows how bad of a quarterback Vick is.
Good call.
#14
Posted 10 November 2012 - 04:35 PM
learn2reid, on 10 November 2012 - 04:26 PM, said:
Good call.
Um, Foles managed a lot more snaps than that behind that line, and a lesser line once Andy started sending the subs in.
Just face it already, Vick's stunk this year in both the regular season and the preseason. He was never much of a qb, and he's less now then ever as he ages.
#15
Posted 10 November 2012 - 04:38 PM
neal_c60, on 10 November 2012 - 04:35 PM, said:
Just face it already, Vick's stunk this year in both the regular season and the preseason. He was never much of a qb, and he's less now then ever as he ages.
Congratulations, Nick Foles is less injury prone than Michael Vick.
He still sucks more as a quarterback.
#16
Posted 10 November 2012 - 05:01 PM
learn2reid, on 10 November 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:
Shut the F up about how he looked already. That's the smallest damn sample size you can get.
Yet you judged Foles negatively based his his preseason play...okk ****.
#17
Posted 10 November 2012 - 05:02 PM
That's why we'd like to start Foles. To see if he sucks more than Vick or less than Vick.
Give the next coach some film to see if he's OK with Foles, or wants to go FA as a stop gap until a good qb comes up in the draft.
#19
Posted 10 November 2012 - 05:26 PM
#20
Posted 10 November 2012 - 05:31 PM
mike030270, on 10 November 2012 - 05:26 PM, said:
Um, Vick played against the 1st teamers, got hurt after 3 and 4 plays, and Foles came in early against 1st stringers, then stayed in against 2nd stringers..
#22
Posted 10 November 2012 - 06:43 PM
learn2reid, on 10 November 2012 - 04:38 PM, said:
He still sucks more as a quarterback.
#24
Posted 10 November 2012 - 07:49 PM
#25
Posted 10 November 2012 - 08:05 PM
Solomon, on 10 November 2012 - 06:43 PM, said:
If Michael Vick threw 90% of his passes to LeSean McCoy, like Nick Foles did against the Patriots, he'd have a lot less sacks too.
Unfortunately, that doesn't work in regular season games against starters and actual defensive schemes.
#26
Posted 10 November 2012 - 08:21 PM
pgcd3, on 10 November 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
#27
Posted 10 November 2012 - 09:44 PM
learn2reid, on 10 November 2012 - 04:26 PM, said:
Good call.
Yet Foles came in behind that same Oline and looked like Jonny Unitas. Hmm.....
You people make so many excuses. Everything isn't an unjust criticism.
#28
Posted 10 November 2012 - 09:51 PM
learn2reid, on 10 November 2012 - 08:05 PM, said:
Unfortunately, that doesn't work in regular season games against starters and actual defensive schemes.
A sixth of Foles' completions went to Lesean in his first extended play ever. Vick incidentally has completed 30 passes to Lesean this season, just over a sixth of his completions.
#30
Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:05 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











