140 replies to this topic

[greenpassion]

foles is in!

you got your smart qb who can read defenses and audible out of crappy play calling

no reason why we shouldnt have a superbowl in the next few years

so lets just leave vick alone please. i know hes sorry for keeping you guys and your great coaching staff from winning multiple superbowls. im sure foles can win throwing the ball all around the field with no running game. HE CAN DO IT

GOOD TIMES ARE COMING!

NO MORE EXCUSES!

i swear i dont wanna hear about the lack of balance on offense or anything he better get it done

[zenclaybourne]

Great, so now you're going to bash Foles to spite the people who bashed Vick. And the cycle of stupidity continues...

[MR-CYN]

Hopefully he goes to a team with green colors so you can keep your screenname the same on your new teams board.

[PrinceKelby]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 04:54 PM, said:

foles is in!

you got your smart qb who can read defenses and audible out of crappy play calling

no reason why we shouldnt have a superbowl in the next few years

so lets just leave vick alone please. i know hes sorry for keeping you guys and your great coaching staff from winning multiple superbowls. im sure foles can win throwing the ball all around the field with no running game. HE CAN DO IT

GOOD TIMES ARE COMING!

NO MORE EXCUSES!

i swear i dont wanna hear about the lack of balance on offense or anything he better get it done

Someone needs a hug. . .



If you couldn't see the difference in watching how an ACTUAL QB works in the pocket, rather than that of an athlete trying to play QB, then I really don't know what to tell you.

The play calling has been horrible as well as the offensive line but when a 10 year vet has worse fundamentals than a rookie then there is a MAJOR problem.  I respect Vick's heart and guts but other than that he should have been a WR.

[Solomon]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 04:54 PM, said:

foles is in!

you got your smart qb who can read defenses and audible out of crappy play calling

no reason why we shouldnt have a superbowl in the next few years

so lets just leave vick alone please. i know hes sorry for keeping you guys and your great coaching staff from winning multiple superbowls. im sure foles can win throwing the ball all around the field with no running game. HE CAN DO IT

GOOD TIMES ARE COMING!

NO MORE EXCUSES!

i swear i dont wanna hear about the lack of balance on offense or anything he better get it done

[ChimpKelly]

OK Chris Crocker.

[MR-CYN]

It really is nice to have another thread to point out Vick's shortcomings though, because there's just so many of them. Thanks bro.

[matchew88]

i'd rather keep bashing Vick

[CMPunk]

Now that Nick Folezzz is in, on to the Super Bowl!!11

[MR-CYN]

CMPunk, on 13 November 2012 - 05:12 PM, said:

Now that Nick Folezzz is in, on to the Super Bowl!!11

Maybe he'll let Vick hold his trophy so he can know what it feels like.

[greenpassion]

PrinceKelby, on 13 November 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:

Someone needs a hug. . .



If you couldn't see the difference in watching how an ACTUAL QB works in the pocket, rather than that of an athlete trying to play QB, then I really don't know what to tell you.

The play calling has been horrible as well as the offensive line but when a 10 year vet has worse fundamentals than a rookie then there is a MAJOR problem.  I respect Vick's heart and guys but other than that he should have been a WR.

what i saw was a qb behind a crappy line with crappy coaching that resulted in more turnovers and a loss which will happen no matter who is at qb the results will almost always be the same

[CalgaryFan77]

People still haven't stopped bashing McNabb, good luck on people stopping bashing Vick until he's at least on a different team.

[CMPunk]

MR-CYN, on 13 November 2012 - 05:21 PM, said:

Maybe he'll let Vick hold his trophy so he can know what it feels like.

He can also let Vick hold his Hall of Famezz bust.

[wussbasket]

MR-CYN, on 13 November 2012 - 05:21 PM, said:

Maybe he'll let Vick hold his trophy so he can know what it feels like.

you wouldn't want vick to fumble it, would you?

[MR-CYN]

CMPunk, on 13 November 2012 - 05:26 PM, said:

He can also let Vick hold his Hall of Famezz bust.

Nah, he would fumble that for sure.

[SirReal]

CalgaryFan77, on 13 November 2012 - 05:24 PM, said:

People still haven't stopped bashing McNabb, good luck on people stopping bashing Vick until he's at least on a different team.

Are you kidding? There are people here who still bash on Hoying!

[L.E.]

[greenpassion]

just got done listening to sal pal and i gotta say the excuses have already started

this guy has been bashing vick for 2 years now today since it was foles in there now its the coaching running a system that doesnt fit the players and foles or any qb cannot succeed in this inviroment... HUGE DOUBLE STANDARD!!!!!

i dont wanna hear it when foles gets sacked imo he shoulda got rid of the ball no matter if the play called for all the wideouts to run 30 yards downfield. if you ask me foles should have changed the play at the line like smart white qbs do

[FlyinBrian36-20]

Lets not give the troll attention...

[JonnyEagles69]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 05:45 PM, said:

just got done listening to sal pal and i gotta say the excuses have already started

this guy has been bashing vick for 2 years now today since it was foles in there now its the coaching running a system that doesnt fit the players and foles or any qb cannot succeed in this inviroment... HUGE DOUBLE STANDARD!!!!!

i dont wanna hear it when foles gets sacked imo he shoulda got rid of the ball no matter if the play called for all the wideouts to run 30 yards downfield. if you ask me foles should have changed the play at the line like smart white qbs do

  

you just made vick cry

[CMPunk]

SirReal, on 13 November 2012 - 05:32 PM, said:

Are you kidding? There are people here who still bash on Hoying!

LOL what a bunch of losers.

[greenpassion]

FlyinBrian36-20, on 13 November 2012 - 05:47 PM, said:

Lets not give the troll attention...

wow i gotta be a troll because im judging foles by the same standards the we dogged vick?

im fair i know hes a rookie so im giving him a lil time before i dog him for not winning a supe

but hed better not get sacked before he gets the ball out and hed better change all of martys crappy plays at the line

[hyperswipe]

zenclaybourne, on 13 November 2012 - 04:56 PM, said:

Great, so now you're going to bash Foles to spite the people who bashed Vick. And the cycle of stupidity continues...

Oh it won't be just him... thats just what everybody does around here!

[downundermike]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 05:23 PM, said:

what i saw was a qb behind a crappy line with crappy coaching that resulted in more turnovers and a loss which will happen no matter who is at qb the results will almost always be the same

What I also saw is a line look better just by changing the guy playing behind it.

[jonnyeagles12]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 05:23 PM, said:

what i saw was a qb behind a crappy line with crappy coaching that resulted in more turnovers and a loss which will happen no matter who is at qb the results will almost always be the same

Vick hasn't had a turnover problem this year, it's been his career. He's ten 10 years pro, he's sucked bad at times this year. Real bad. Browns game was the sign he wasn't that good. I'd like Vick to do well, got nothing against him. But he was never going to win a super bowl with us. Now or ever. Foles isn't going to now either, but you never know what will happen in the future unless he gets played.

[baldbird]

I remember the first 4 -5 games of this season everyone kept saying Vick will be ok he is just trying to get up to speed after missing preseason  lol ...Vick has been trying to catch up to the speed of the game since he been a rookie you can't catch up if you don't understand the QB position.. I say Foles can get up to speed in a few games it wont take him his whole carrier but we all know he will have his ups and downs moving forward but rookies will make mistakes. When a 10 year vet is still making rookie mistakes then why not move on and see what you have in the 3rd rounder he can't be any worse .

[lb7]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 04:54 PM, said:

foles is in!

you got your smart qb who can read defenses and audible out of crappy play calling

no reason why we shouldnt have a superbowl in the next few years

so lets just leave vick alone please. i know hes sorry for keeping you guys and your great coaching staff from winning multiple superbowls. im sure foles can win throwing the ball all around the field with no running game. HE CAN DO IT

GOOD TIMES ARE COMING!

NO MORE EXCUSES!

i swear i dont wanna hear about the lack of balance on offense or anything he better get it done

Most fans are very aware that both Reid and Vick suck, why pull Foles into it.

[Audit2]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 04:54 PM, said:

foles is in!

you got your smart qb who can read defenses and audible out of crappy play calling

no reason why we shouldnt have a superbowl in the next few years

so lets just leave vick alone please. i know hes sorry for keeping you guys and your great coaching staff from winning multiple superbowls. im sure foles can win throwing the ball all around the field with no running game. HE CAN DO IT

GOOD TIMES ARE COMING!

NO MORE EXCUSES!

i swear i dont wanna hear about the lack of balance on offense or anything he better get it done

Excuses??  How about a reality Check?  There are guys on this board saying Foles had a good game .  I want the guy to succeed but stop with the illusions.

[forevereagles]

greenpassion, on 13 November 2012 - 06:00 PM, said:

wow i gotta be a troll because im judging foles by the same standards the we dogged vick?

im fair i know hes a rookie so im giving him a lil time before i dog him for not winning a supe

but hed better not get sacked before he gets the ball out and hed better change all of martys crappy plays at the line

He's already done both. so now what is your next demand?

[eaglesguru]

MARCUS, is that you?