Jim Washburn FIRED
#1
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:18 AM
Did you guys @ Novacare not see the stupidity in this?
There was only one way for this to end and we are seeing the results and the downfall of this franchise.
#2
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:25 AM
#3
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:31 AM
JPL0720, on 03 December 2012 - 08:25 AM, said:
#4
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:03 AM
#5
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:30 AM
#6
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:54 AM
I guess I wonder, Dave, if its normal for a head coach who most likely not be around to help with the rebuilding to be so involved in the demolition of the old order, an order that he personally built.
#7
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:17 AM
I would start with the safeties and then jetision the corners, just to feel a bit better about things...
#8
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:32 AM
#9
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:32 AM
#10
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:33 AM
Erie, on 03 December 2012 - 09:54 AM, said:
I guess I wonder, Dave, if its normal for a head coach who most likely not be around to help with the rebuilding to be so involved in the demolition of the old order, an order that he personally built.
Andy is operating like he thinks he can save his job, IMO. I can't figure out why a lame duck coach is firing assistant coaches and cutting starters 12 weeks into a completely lost season.
#11
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:33 AM
Why the hate on Marty? The eagles scored a lot of points yesterday...finally. Turnovers and the defense's inability to get off the field on third down was the issue...again.
#12
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:43 AM
Erie, on 03 December 2012 - 09:54 AM, said:
A very good question.
And one that will certainly not be answered.
#13
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:47 AM
#14
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:48 AM
PhillyPhan13, on 03 December 2012 - 10:33 AM, said:
Why the hate on Marty? The eagles scored a lot of points yesterday...finally. Turnovers and the defense's inability to get off the field on third down was the issue...again.
A lot of fans are bizarrely obsessed with Marty, who is simply an extension of Reid. Even if you think he's completely incompetent, firing Marty would be like trimming a fingernail and expecting the cancer to be removed.
Don't get me wrong...you can make a case for firing anyone on the team. Firing Marty would affect the absolute least amount of change, though, which is what makes the obsession over it so truly bizarre.
#15
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:52 AM
f_dallas, on 03 December 2012 - 10:48 AM, said:
Don't get me wrong...you can make a case for firing anyone on the team. Firing Marty would affect the absolute least amount of change, though, which is what makes the obsession over it so truly bizarre.
Right now, everyone just wants to see heads roll. There's only one I'm concerned with.
I agree on your Marty thought, and I also think it's bizarre how people are still making scheme and strategy suggestions, as if it makes a bit of difference at this point. If anything, let's lose out and get as good a pick as we can, and (hopefully) hire someone competent to make that pick.
#16
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:58 AM
The Defense though has just been a disaster and I don't know what to say other than we should of kept Jauron as DC and I think that would of been huge. We then wouldn't of reached for Nnamdi and would've kept Asante and still would of got DRc and those two could of played a zone defense and done well with it.
IDk, but the season is lost and the future of this team is all guesses and uncertainity.
Part of me at times wants Reid back with powers stripped from him and other times i want him gone NOW.
Right now I'm at Gone......
#17
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:09 AM
egforever, on 03 December 2012 - 10:58 AM, said:
The Defense though has just been a disaster and I don't know what to say other than we should of kept Jauron as DC and I think that would of been huge. We then wouldn't of reached for Nnamdi and would've kept Asante and still would of got DRc and those two could of played a zone defense and done well with it.
IDk, but the season is lost and the future of this team is all guesses and uncertainity.
Part of me at times wants Reid back with powers stripped from him and other times i want him gone NOW.
Right now I'm at Gone......
Please don't blame this debacle on injuries....this has been a 6-7 year slide into the abyss. To think for a second that bringing Reid back would change anything is just ridiculous.
Reid's direction since 2005 has taken us to this depth and only a complete regime change (including Howie and all the scouts) will flush things out.
A whole new direction and thought process is needed.
#18
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:31 AM
patpikunas, on 03 December 2012 - 11:09 AM, said:
Reid's direction since 2005 has taken us to this depth and only a complete regime change (including Howie and all the scouts) will flush things out.
A whole new direction and thought process is needed.
#19
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:32 AM
egforever, on 03 December 2012 - 10:58 AM, said:
The Defense though has just been a disaster and I don't know what to say other than we should of kept Jauron as DC and I think that would of been huge. We then wouldn't of reached for Nnamdi and would've kept Asante and still would of got DRc and those two could of played a zone defense and done well with it.
IDk, but the season is lost and the future of this team is all guesses and uncertainity.
Part of me at times wants Reid back with powers stripped from him and other times i want him gone NOW.
Right now I'm at Gone......
Don't forget, their offense didn't have injury issues until recently and they were putrid all year. They lost Peters in the off-season and Kelce early this year, of course, but everyone loses players to injury.
#20
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:40 AM
patpikunas, on 03 December 2012 - 11:09 AM, said:
Reid's direction since 2005 has taken us to this depth and only a complete regime change (including Howie and all the scouts) will flush things out.
A whole new direction and thought process is needed.
It is nothing short of absolutely stunning there is still someone who can fog a mirror that believes Reid should come back to complete a full decade and a half of ringless coaching here.
The fact that it took this damn long for the fan base to catch on at all was incredible enough, but that there are actually thinking (?) people that still want to continue the madness????????????????????
#21
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:41 AM
f_dallas, on 03 December 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:
#22
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:42 AM
egforever, on 03 December 2012 - 11:31 AM, said:
And 14 years, deteriorating further as it went along, isn't enough to convince you that it just might be possible there is a better way somewhere out there.
How much f****ng worse can this situation be than it is right now?
#23
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:45 AM
egforever, on 03 December 2012 - 11:31 AM, said:
I hear what you're saying, but here are my two answers.
1. Nothing is worse than the situation they are in right right. Middling teams are the death of a franchise because they give you just enough hope to stick with a losing hand too long and are just good enough to play their way out of premium draft picks.
2. Reid is finished here, so anything that happens after he's fired is a step in the right direction. I'd liken it to the McNabb situation a couple years ago. His career was essentially over, so there was nothing lost in trading him. They weren't trading 25 year old McNabb...they were trading a player who was finished. When the Eagles fire Reid, they won't be firing "5 consecutive 11+ win seasons" Reid...they'll be firing a coach who has basically been .500 for the last 8 years. The coach who led them from 1999-2004 is gone, he's not coming back, and it's probably best to think of him of another guy who retired after the 2004 season.
You mentioned Norv as an example of someone you don't want (I agree, of course), but would it surprise you to learn Norv and his fired predecessor Marty Schottenheimer have a better combined record over the last 8 years than Reid?
8 years..hell of a long time in the NFL.
#24
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:46 AM
mjkvol, on 03 December 2012 - 10:43 AM, said:
And one that will certainly not be answered.
#25
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:00 PM
mjkvol, on 03 December 2012 - 11:40 AM, said:
The fact that it took this damn long for the fan base to catch on at all was incredible enough, but that there are actually thinking (?) people that still want to continue the madness????????????????????
Man MJ, were all frustrated and I'm not happy at all with the last few years and It's all on Reid and Lurie period. Lurie hired him and has let him hang around and it's Reid 's for the coaching hires, poor drafts and FA's they bring in. We all understand that, I was just saying that the change coming has me worried is all. Any logical person should contemplate the positives and negatives right? I know it's time Reid hits the road, but it makes me nervous is all as to what we''ll be like after........
#26
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:11 PM
f_dallas, on 03 December 2012 - 11:45 AM, said:
1. Nothing is worse than the situation they are in right right. Middling teams are the death of a franchise because they give you just enough hope to stick with a losing hand too long and are just good enough to play their way out of premium draft picks.
2. Reid is finished here, so anything that happens after he's fired is a step in the right direction. I'd liken it to the McNabb situation a couple years ago. His career was essentially over, so there was nothing lost in trading him. They weren't trading 25 year old McNabb...they were trading a player who was finished. When the Eagles fire Reid, they won't be firing "5 consecutive 11+ win seasons" Reid...they'll be firing a coach who has basically been .500 for the last 8 years. The coach who led them from 1999-2004 is gone, he's not coming back, and it's probably best to think of him of another guy who retired after the 2004 season.
You mentioned Norv as an example of someone you don't want (I agree, of course), but would it surprise you to learn Norv and his fired predecessor Marty Schottenheimer have a better combined record over the last 8 years than Reid?
8 years..hell of a long time in the NFL.
I Was trying to say it simply makes me nervous as to whats gonna happen when he's fired. I know it's time. I know it's over do. I know it's the right and best thing to do. I know we'll be better off for it. Just nervous and ecxited to see what happens.
#27
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:27 PM
egforever, on 03 December 2012 - 12:00 PM, said:
Man MJ, were all frustrated and I'm not happy at all with the last few years and It's all on Reid and Lurie period. Lurie hired him and has let him hang around and it's Reid 's for the coaching hires, poor drafts and FA's they bring in. We all understand that, I was just saying that the change coming has me worried is all. Any logical person should contemplate the positives and negatives right? I know it's time Reid hits the road, but it makes me nervous is all as to what we''ll be like after........
Sorry for the harshness, but even the thought of continuing this is insanity to me.
To answer the bolded question - absolutely, positively not for a fraction of a millisecond.
There are no negatives at this point with removing this entire regime, so there is nothing to contemplate. Listen, I obviously believe he should have been gone five years ago, but there was at least a debate about it then - there isn't anymore. As f_dallas said, we aren't firing the 1999-2004 Reid, we're firing the mediocre coach who has been here since 2005. And as I said in another thread, the team that overpays to bring this guy in will find that out the hard way.
Don't be nervous, my friend. This is something that is beyond essential, and long overdue, if we ever want to have a hope for a championship here.
#28
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:33 PM
mjkvol, on 03 December 2012 - 12:27 PM, said:
To answer the bolded question - absolutely, positively not for a fraction of a millisecond.
There are no negatives at this point with removing this entire regime, so there is nothing to contemplate. Listen, I obviously believe he should have been gone five years ago, but there was at least a debate about it then - there isn't anymore. As f_dallas said, we aren't firing the 1999-2004 Reid, we're firing the mediocre coach who has been here since 2005. And as I said in another thread, the team that overpays to bring this guy in will find that out the hard way.
Don't be nervous, my friend. This is something that is beyond essential, and long overdue, if we ever want to have a hope for a championship here.
We are going to win 3 or 4 games this year... even if we went winless next year but approached things philosophically different the right way, I would be so much happier knowing the potential upside would be greater than that of the Reid-Howie-Banner-Lurie era.
#29
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:17 PM
mjkvol, on 03 December 2012 - 12:27 PM, said:
To answer the bolded question - absolutely, positively not for a fraction of a millisecond.
There are no negatives at this point with removing this entire regime, so there is nothing to contemplate. Listen, I obviously believe he should have been gone five years ago, but there was at least a debate about it then - there isn't anymore. As f_dallas said, we aren't firing the 1999-2004 Reid, we're firing the mediocre coach who has been here since 2005. And as I said in another thread, the team that overpays to bring this guy in will find that out the hard way.
Don't be nervous, my friend. This is something that is beyond essential, and long overdue, if we ever want to have a hope for a championship here.
#30
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:53 PM
egforever, on 03 December 2012 - 02:17 PM, said:
He will likely not leave Ohio State for a long time, but I would love to see Urban Meyer here under a proven GM-VP of Football operations like Bill Polian.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











