wow o-line actually looks good
#1
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:58 PM
takes the pressure off your qb
takes the pressure off the o-line
ACTUALLY SCORE POINTS!
normally it would help out a defense too by keeping them fresh but nothing can help THIS defense
just think what coulda been over these last 2 years running the ball like this
#2
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:00 PM
under 35 pass attempts and 20+ runs with your RB gives this team a great chance to win games
#3
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:02 PM
And they didn't blitz. That's been a big problem with them, too.
#4
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:05 PM
this is how you win games. imagine if you had jax on the outside too it would open up for shots down the field
#5
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:06 PM
The boys suck on D and barely blitzed at all save for the first quarter.
But running the football will ALWAYS be the way to win football games. Always. That's football guys. This whole "it's a passing league" is BS. It will never be a passing league. If you can't gain at least some yards on the ground and keep safeties honest your passing game is over.
#6
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:18 PM
eephraim, on 03 December 2012 - 01:06 PM, said:
The boys suck on D and barely blitzed at all save for the first quarter.
But running the football will ALWAYS be the way to win football games. Always. That's football guys. This whole "it's a passing league" is BS. It will never be a passing league. If you can't gain at least some yards on the ground and keep safeties honest your passing game is over.
BS. You win in this league with great QB play and good defense.
Running the ball is needed but not the reason why teams win.
#7
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:20 PM
#8
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:28 PM
eephraim, on 03 December 2012 - 01:06 PM, said:
The boys suck on D and barely blitzed at all save for the first quarter.
But running the football will ALWAYS be the way to win football games. Always. That's football guys. This whole "it's a passing league" is BS. It will never be a passing league. If you can't gain at least some yards on the ground and keep safeties honest your passing game is over.
Eli Manning (2), Aaron Rodgers (1), Drew Brees (1), Ben Roethlisberger (2), Peyton Manning (1), Tom Brady (3). That's the list of QBs who have won the SB in the past nine years and how many SB wins they each have. You think the running game was more important than the passing game for most of these guys?
#9
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:34 PM
Gimpy, on 03 December 2012 - 01:28 PM, said:
Manning won because of amazing defensive play and slightly because of his offense
Starks averaged almost 5 YPC in the Superbowl for GB
Brees has good runningbacks...Reggie Bush...Pierre Thomas..
Ben has a top 3 defense and a great RBs.
Manning had Addai I believe...
and Brady had a coach who knew how to cheat (notice how he hasn't won **** since)
#10
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:38 PM
#11
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:39 PM
eli had bradshaw and jacobs andeven more his receievers made big plays for him
the saints and breese ran the ball i dont know if they racked up alot of yards but i know they had good balance
#12
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:42 PM
#13
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:43 PM
greenpassion, on 03 December 2012 - 01:39 PM, said:
eli had bradshaw and jacobs andeven more his receievers made big plays for him
the saints and breese ran the ball i dont know if they racked up alot of yards but i know they had good balance
All those teams had good defenses. What Dungy did was bring his defensive mind to the Colts, which they desperately needed.
The Saints and Giants both had great defenses.
Running the ball is important, but defense and great QB play is much more important. Loo at GB. They won when their defense was playing lights out. Now their defense is mediocre and they are barely even in the conversation.
#14
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:55 PM
Kolbfan4, on 03 December 2012 - 01:34 PM, said:
Manning won because of amazing defensive play and slightly because of his offense
Starks averaged almost 5 YPC in the Superbowl for GB
Brees has good runningbacks...Reggie Bush...Pierre Thomas..
Ben has a top 3 defense and a great RBs.
Manning had Addai I believe...
and Brady had a coach who knew how to cheat (notice how he hasn't won **** since)
greenpassion, on 03 December 2012 - 01:39 PM, said:
eli had bradshaw and jacobs andeven more his receievers made big plays for him
the saints and breese ran the ball i dont know if they racked up alot of yards but i know they had good balance
Those are all teams with elite quarterbacks though. You really think Joseph Addai and Ahmad Bradshaw had more to do with their teams' SB runs than the Mannings that were at the helm? Last year, the two teams with the best passing offenses were the teams with the best records in their respective conferences.
Who are the best QBs of the last ten years that haven't won a ring? Then think of the best RBs that haven't won a ring. Some of the best of the best running backs (LT, Peterson, Chris Johnson, Westbrook) don't have rings while all of the uppermost echelon QBs do. Doesn't that tell you something?
#15
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:11 PM
iluvdaeagles, on 03 December 2012 - 01:00 PM, said:
under 35 pass attempts and 20+ runs with your RB gives this team a great chance to win games
#16
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:21 PM
Pallidrone, on 03 December 2012 - 01:18 PM, said:
Running the ball is needed but not the reason why teams win.
Andy Reid, is that you? You should be ashamed of yourself. Notice the teams are winning all have running games. I wonder why that is?
#17
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:52 PM
again its not so much about production but about keeping good balance. yes most those team mentioned strong suite was throwing the ball but i maintain they still kept good balance. there have been teams that have won superbowls with less than spectacular qbs
the first supe that big ben won was mostly due to great defense and running the ball
i remember when the giants beat the undefeated pats. the opening drive lasted nearly the entire qaurter with them running for 2, 3 yards then converting third an short
running the ball is more than just yardage but it wears down the d-line and that helps the o-line
#18
Posted 03 December 2012 - 07:06 PM
#19
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:22 PM
If you don't have one of those QB's and you can't find another one, then you better be able to run the ball and play great defense if you want a chance to win
#20
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:30 PM
#21
Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:37 PM
greenpassion, on 03 December 2012 - 12:58 PM, said:
takes the pressure off your qb
takes the pressure off the o-line
ACTUALLY SCORE POINTS!
normally it would help out a defense too by keeping them fresh but nothing can help THIS defense
just think what coulda been over these last 2 years running the ball like this
They look BETTER than they have all season. Dunlap is still a bad fit at LT. He manned up last night and held it down. But, he still got beaten a lot. A good Oline is one that does it game in game out, same guys, same scheme, for at least a year. The Eagles have a lot of work to do.
This is with the healthy additions of Peters, Kelce, Herramans. Scott is in over Watkins. Mathis stays. Remember both the LT and RT are coming off serious, often career threatening injuries. They have to re-acclimate to the game speed and their teammates.
#22
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:12 PM
i cant imagine as an o-linemen in reids system the amount of pressure your under all game long, anything less than an allpro is gonna struggle
#23
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:47 PM
greenpassion, on 03 December 2012 - 12:58 PM, said:
takes the pressure off your qb
takes the pressure off the o-line
ACTUALLY SCORE POINTS!
normally it would help out a defense too by keeping them fresh but nothing can help THIS defense
just think what coulda been over these last 2 years running the ball like this
what are you talking about the eagles with mccoy last year were effective running the ball, he broke the franchise record for most rushing tds in a seasons, and they still ended up 8-8.
the problem isnt the running game, eagles fans like to whine about the run pass ratio when reid is right around the league average. the leading rusher this year is A.P his team isnt going to win the super bowl and most likely wont even make the playoffs, the giants had the worst rushing team in the league last year going into the playoffs and won a super bowl, the packers the year before the last few years have one of the highest pass rates, the patriots won super bowls consistently being in the bottom 4th of the league in rushing.
this isnt the 1980's where dominant running games win, this is the wide open nfl where passing and qbs win.
#24
Posted 03 December 2012 - 10:57 PM
greenpassion, on 03 December 2012 - 01:39 PM, said:
eli had bradshaw and jacobs andeven more his receievers made big plays for him
the saints and breese ran the ball i dont know if they racked up alot of yards but i know they had good balance
#25
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:47 PM
Utebird, on 03 December 2012 - 10:47 PM, said:
the problem isnt the running game, eagles fans like to whine about the run pass ratio when reid is right around the league average. the leading rusher this year is A.P his team isnt going to win the super bowl and most likely wont even make the playoffs, the giants had the worst rushing team in the league last year going into the playoffs and won a super bowl, the packers the year before the last few years have one of the highest pass rates, the patriots won super bowls consistently being in the bottom 4th of the league in rushing.
this isnt the 1980's where dominant running games win, this is the wide open nfl where passing and qbs win.
you cant just look at stats and make that a determining factor. there were alot of things that went into us not doing much last season. like i said its about balance. your not gonna convince me or the city that reid passing the ball too much is not a problem. also we have all seen that when the season is lost or games are lost reid will all of a sudden start running the ball its almost like he does it cause he knows the media is gonna talk about it but in crucial situations reid is very predictable
#26
Posted 05 December 2012 - 01:19 PM
Greg Garrity, on 03 December 2012 - 01:02 PM, said:
And they didn't blitz. That's been a big problem with them, too.
Let's see how good our DL looks against the Bucs and Bengals, chances are you're gonna see what you've seen all year long barring the Cowboys and Redskins, the worst OL in the league.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











