I don't know how many times I've seen Nnamdi on the line giving a press look and immediately bailing without ever attempting to get a jam. Is this Nnamdi doing his own thing or is this a schematic choice?
The reason I ask is it just seems bizarre...I can't figure out why you'd expose yourself to all the risk of lining up tight on a WR and not bothering to reap any of the reward (slowing/disrupting his route).
If it's just a look designed to mask a coverage, I guess it is what it is, but it seems to be happening too frequently.
Nnamdi bailing at the LOS
Started by
f_dallas
, Dec 03 2012 03:23 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:23 PM
#2
Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:27 PM
f_dallas, on 03 December 2012 - 03:23 PM, said:
I don't know how many times I've seen Nnamdi on the line giving a press look and immediately bailing without ever attempting to get a jam. Is this Nnamdi doing his own thing or is this a schematic choice?
The reason I ask is it just seems bizarre...I can't figure out why you'd expose yourself to all the risk of lining up tight on a WR and not bothering to reap any of the reward (slowing/disrupting his route).
If it's just a look designed to mask a coverage, I guess it is what it is, but it seems to be happening too frequently.
The reason I ask is it just seems bizarre...I can't figure out why you'd expose yourself to all the risk of lining up tight on a WR and not bothering to reap any of the reward (slowing/disrupting his route).
If it's just a look designed to mask a coverage, I guess it is what it is, but it seems to be happening too frequently.
#3
Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:40 PM
f_dallas, on 03 December 2012 - 03:23 PM, said:
I don't know how many times I've seen Nnamdi on the line giving a press look and immediately bailing without ever attempting to get a jam. Is this Nnamdi doing his own thing or is this a schematic choice?
The reason I ask is it just seems bizarre...I can't figure out why you'd expose yourself to all the risk of lining up tight on a WR and not bothering to reap any of the reward (slowing/disrupting his route).
If it's just a look designed to mask a coverage, I guess it is what it is, but it seems to be happening too frequently.
The reason I ask is it just seems bizarre...I can't figure out why you'd expose yourself to all the risk of lining up tight on a WR and not bothering to reap any of the reward (slowing/disrupting his route).
If it's just a look designed to mask a coverage, I guess it is what it is, but it seems to be happening too frequently.
You answered your own question and happened to find the solution as well.
It's used too frequently. Play like corners in Seattle. Press man all game. F all of this zone coverage mess. Your safeties are terrible at it.
#4
Posted 03 December 2012 - 04:05 PM
eephraim, on 03 December 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:
You answered your own question and happened to find the solution as well.
It's used too frequently. Play like corners in Seattle. Press man all game. F all of this zone coverage mess. Your safeties are terrible at it.
It's used too frequently. Play like corners in Seattle. Press man all game. F all of this zone coverage mess. Your safeties are terrible at it.
I assume its scheme, but after all the issues with Asante being asked to do certain things in coverage and essentially refusing on gamedays, it made me wonder if Nnamdi is supposed to jam, but isn't (perhaps because he's not feeling confident in his game, or whatever).
#6
Posted 10 December 2012 - 09:42 AM
The play in the secondary has been far too inconsistent and Nnamdi's struggles have been well chronicled. He plays the coverage that he is asked to play. Struggles all around in the secondary
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











