Posted 03 December 2012 - 05:23 PM
Posted 03 December 2012 - 06:07 PM
Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:34 AM
Posted 04 December 2012 - 02:46 PM
Posted 04 December 2012 - 05:56 PM
Just because he wanted it doesn't mean there was any way in hell giving it to him should have ever been a serious consideration. It was beyond ridiculous, & the results bore that out.
Posted 04 December 2012 - 09:02 PM
When you hire the D-line coach first, and he's locked into the controversial Wide-9, you don't find better options.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 06:39 AM
Apparently not much about much of anything.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:58 AM
We said it at the time - just the idea of hiring a DL coach with a wacky concept first, and then making the use of the wacky concept a condition of taking the DC job, in and of itself is so f****ng absurd, it escapes rational thought. What self respecting defensive coordinator would accept such idiotic terms? Ergo, we got the offensive line coach.
I always found it bizarre the way the fan base was gushing over the OL and DL coaches at the time - where or when have you ever seen such an emphasis on line coaches? Just another of the zillion ways this entire regime was a** backward in everything it did over the last 5-6 years, yet was not called on it until the roof caved in.
Posted 05 December 2012 - 09:52 AM
I wish we had all of the relevant info as to how it actually went down and what the thought process was within the organization (not that it changes anything).
Clearly the inability to find a suitable replacement for JJ is one of the major factors for the teams demise.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users