Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

BDawk_ASamuel

St. Louis

62 posts in this topic

Hindsight is 20/20, but I'm still shocked that they gave up the #2 pick and passed up on Griffin. They were totally d*cked over by Bradford's contract and I thought it was a no brainer that they should have taken Griffin at the time, as did many others. Everyone will always talk about Luck and Griffin for the rest of their careers, but I feel like this may go down in epic historical proportions for St. Louis as one of the worst draft decisions ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disagree...we still need to see what the end up doing with all the picks they got.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hindsight is 20/20, but I'm still shocked that they gave up the #2 pick and passed up on Griffin. They were totally d*cked over by Bradford's contract and I thought it was a no brainer that they should have taken Griffin at the time, as did many others. Everyone will always talk about Luck and Griffin for the rest of their careers, but I feel like this may go down in epic historical proportions for St. Louis as one of the worst draft decisions ever.

What if Fisher wins the SB with Bradford? They have a good young QB with a ishy but getting better O-Line. They have stockpiled draft picks and have 22, that is right 22 rookies on their team. Fisher cleaned house and has a very young team at .500, this could work out for both franchises, IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if Fisher wins the SB with Bradford? They have a good young QB with a ishy but getting better O-Line. They have stockpiled draft picks and have 22, that is right 22 rookies on their team. Fisher cleaned house and has a very young team at .500, this could work out for both franchises, IMHO.

Meh, maybe you're right. I'm just not big on Bradford at all and he really hasn't taken the next step in his career. He's really been a bust so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about Cleveland letting the Skins leapfrog then? Worst organization in sports imo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh, maybe you're right. I'm just not big on Bradford at all and he really hasn't taken the next step in his career. He's really been a bust so far.

I was very impressed with him his rookie year (the last time he had a line). He is not a mobile QB and has been blasted the last 2.5 years (remember he had that injury the year before last that kept him out most of the season). I think Bradford will be fine as he gets more time to read and throw, right now, that is a very spotty proposition.

How about Cleveland letting the Skins leapfrog then? Worst organization in sports imo

Cleveland looks pretty stupid for sure, the Rams only time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh, maybe you're right. I'm just not big on Bradford at all and he really hasn't taken the next step in his career. He's really been a bust so far.

Not even close, no QB in the league would be doing well in his situation the past 3 years. If they use their plethora of picks wisely, they can do some good things with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh, maybe you're right. I'm just not big on Bradford at all and he really hasn't taken the next step in his career. He's really been a bust so far.

To be fair, his best weapons are an over the hill Steven Jackson, Danny Amendola and the other Steve Smith.

At the end of the day, he will probably be a Drew Bledsoe type guy (he was also picked 1st) as in the Rams can win with him but he will never be elite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Rams have done a poor job in surrounding Bradford with talent. We have to see if Fisher is better at that. As for the Browns, the front office and coaching will be cleaned out at the end of the year and Weeden will probably be backing up their new QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair, his best weapons are an over the hill Steven Jackson, Danny Amendola and the other Steve Smith.

At the end of the day, he will probably be a Drew Bledsoe type guy (he was also picked 1st) as in the Rams can win with him but he will never be elite.

No Mike Vick :roll: :roll: :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

St Louis O-Line gave up 55 sacks last year, dead last. Bradford is lucking he is still upright.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also thought for a little bit that they should have dealt Bradford and drafted RG3, but in hinsight they got way too much from the Redskins to turn that deal down.

They got a boat load from Washington and still have (2) 1st round picks in the 2013 and 2014 drafts b/c of that trade. That is how a franschise improves thier re-building process by 1-2 seasons IMO

Oh and BTW, if Bradford gets any weapons around him dont forget he was the #1 overall pick for a reason..... Hes a really good QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also thought for a little bit that they should have dealt Bradford and drafted RG3, but in hinsight they got way too much from the Redskins to turn that deal down.

They got a boat load from Washington and still have (2) 1st round picks in the 2013 and 2014 drafts b/c of that trade. That is how a franschise improves thier re-building process by 1-2 seasons IMO

Oh and BTW, if Bradford gets any weapons around him dont forget he was the #1 overall pick for a reason..... Hes a really good QB.

But they could have also dealt Bradford for at least a 1st round pick and took Griffin #2 overall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But they could have also dealt Bradford for at least a 1st round pick and took Griffin #2 overall.

Why would they do that? They already have a QB with a high ceiling, now with the plethora of picks they can build a team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would they do that? They already have a QB with a high ceiling, now with the plethora of picks they can build a team.

Yeah, its not crazy to stick with Bradford. I'm just saying if they wanted to they could have had RG3 plus a few picks. They could have taken Griffin at #2 and then dealt Bradford for 2 1sts or a 1st and 2nd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradford is beginning to run out of excuses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But they could have also dealt Bradford for at least a 1st round pick and took Griffin #2 overall.

I dont think any team would give St. Louis a 1st rounder for Bradford IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think any team would give St. Louis a 1st rounder for Bradford IMO.

I don't either. Certainly not now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hindsight is 20/20, but I'm still shocked that they gave up the #2 pick and passed up on Griffin. They were totally d*cked over by Bradford's contract and I thought it was a no brainer that they should have taken Griffin at the time, as did many others. Everyone will always talk about Luck and Griffin for the rest of their careers, but I feel like this may go down in epic historical proportions for St. Louis as one of the worst draft decisions ever.

I agree and still stand by my belief they should have selected Suh #1 overall instead of Bradford when they had the chance. Imo, Suh has suffered under

the leadership of Jim Schwartz. The Lions are a very talented team,but they are a reflection of their coach. They lack discipline. I believe they rank #2 in

offense and 14 in total defense. With those rankings,they should be serious SB contenders instead of a team that won't make the playoffs. Suh was the

most dominant D- Lineman in college I've seen since Reggie White. I believe he would be closer to reaching his potential under better coaching. Instead

he's a loose cannon much like his head coach Schwartz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sags was the HC (I think) during that draft....

What makes you think that Suh would have listened to Spags more then Schwartz?

BTW, You always take a chance on a franchise QB over a dominate DL with the #1 overall pick 100% of the time. If STL didnt like Bradford at #1 overall they should have traded down alittle bit and saved alot of $$$$$

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradford is beginning to run out of excuses.

He has yet to have a legit #1 Reciever. If any QBs are running out of excuses its Christian Ponder, Blaine Gabbert and Josh Freeman. They all have great running games and decent receiving cores.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They did get arguably the best db in the draft with the 2nd round pick they got in that trade as well. I think they are building smart, knew they were a few years away so now have the ammo to put it together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Myabe if they've soured on Bradford that much they'll give Vick a look?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sags was the HC (I think) during that draft....

What makes you think that Suh would have listened to Spags more then Schwartz?

BTW, You always take a chance on a franchise QB over a dominate DL with the #1 overall pick 100% of the time. If STL didnt like Bradford at #1 overall they should have traded down alittle bit and saved alot of $$$$$

It's just a hunch with Suh. Schwartz condones his on the field behavior on many occasions instead of condemning it. After he stomped Packers O-Lineman Evin Smith on

Thanksgiving day 2 years ago,Schwartz should have pulled him off the field immediately and made him sit on the bench for a few series Imo. The personal foul gave the

Packers a 1st down instead of making them attempt a FG. The Packers later scored a TD and it gave them 4 points they wouldn't have if Suh had kept his temper under

control.

Another good example of the Lions lack of discipline occurred in the playoff game against the Saints last year. The Lions had 2 drives in the 2nd quarter ended by

offensive PI calls against TE Brandon Pettigrew. They were obvious calls. Instead of getting in Pettigres grill,Schwartz throws a fit on the sideline and starts screaming

at the officials who made the correct call. Most coaches would have pulled Pettigrew aside and let him know dumb mistakes like his can cost the team the game.

I definitely agree you go with a franchise QB 100% of the time when you have the chance. However,Bradford wasn't a No Brainer pick like either Manning,Luck or

RG3. He was just the best QB in a overall weak class at the position. There were injury concerns. He had trouble staying healthy against relatively weak competition

in college.The Big 12 is not known for stout defenses and he rarely faced an opponent with a great pass rush. Qb's like Bradford come out every year. D-Linemen

like Suh come out once a generation.

The Raiders made a similar mistake a few years earlier Imo. They selected JaMarcus Russell and passed on a once a generation talent at Wr. in Calvin Johnson.

Imo again,When those special players at other positions are available,it's the only time you should pass on the Qb and fill that position later.

Every team would love to trade down and acquire more picks. More often than not,it's just message board material between us fans. Trading down is easy. The problem

is finding a team that wants to trade up and is willing to give up a lot of picks in the process. Bradford wasn't one of those Qb's a team was willing to trade up to

#1 to select .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites