BOYCOTT THE REDSKIN GAME
#1
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:25 AM
#2
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:31 AM
So what message are you trying to send? That football teams shouldn't have bad seasons? "Hey sports team, don't lose games." Is that the message?
#3
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:40 AM
desurvivor, on 14 December 2012 - 07:25 AM, said:
Why should Lurie say a word. I didn't notice him on the field. Maybe I missed something ??
He has given the people in charge of FOOTBALL OPERATIONS whatever they have wanted, whenever they have wanted it.
Start with the PROVEN NFL PLAYERS that have sucked over the last 2 years.
Then move to the coaches that have failed.
Lurie has allowed every TOP PROVEN FREE AGENT there was to come here for big dollars. He has allowed every WELL KKNOWN PROVEN TOP COACH that Reid could find to sign here. And they ahve also all failed. That's Lurie's fault ???
Not 1 single person on earth would have predicted that they ALLL WOULD SUCK.
You knew that the best special teams coach in the NFL would look like he never coached special teams in his life ???
You knew that THE TOP OL coach would come here and be average at best ??
You knew that T.Bowles and his wonderful ability to work with players would look like he never sen a football player in his life ??
You knew, even though I was against it,, that Washburn and hios silly arse wide 9 would turn a bunch of really talented DL into high school looking players ???
You knew that TWO of the best cover CBs in the NFL would look like they never covered a pro player in their life ??
You knew that M.Vick was going to completely suck ?? Well, most of us did.
Seriously. These were all proven entities that were brought in. These weren't players and coaches that were new to the game.
Start by looking at the incredible failed efforts by these PROVEN NFL HIGHLY PAYED PLAYERS.
#4
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:41 AM
At one point, the Eagles turned the ball over on three consecutive plays and four times in five plays - a feat so laughable that the few fans remaining at Lincoln Financial Field could barely muster the deafening boos they would ordinarily dispense.
#5
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:43 AM
#6
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:48 AM
desurvivor, on 14 December 2012 - 07:41 AM, said:
At one point, the Eagles turned the ball over on three consecutive plays and four times in five plays - a feat so laughable that the few fans remaining at Lincoln Financial Field could barely muster the deafening boos they would ordinarily dispense.
I'm not trying to stick up for Lurie or his bank account...but I just don't see your point. This is the deal you got yourself into by becoming a sports fan. Sometimes your teams are good. Sometimes it's bad. If you don't like it, then go be a fan of whatever team wins the Super Bowl each year...or just stop watching sports.
If Lurie went on TV a few weeks ago and said, "Reid will return. Screw the fans." then yeah, go ahead and be angry. But we all know there's a 99% chance that he'll be gone. So what's there to boycott? Lurie already knows the team is bad...so your idea about boycotting will prove what, exactly? If the owner is aware of how bad the team is...which he is....then I fail to see where your idea is going.
#7
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:54 AM
#9
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:27 AM
Win or lose, I will always try to get to games.
It's not like they are consistent losers. Many cities would kill to have a team like we have.
Maybe the seats will finally open up to old time fans.
#10
Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:59 AM
#11
Posted 14 December 2012 - 04:50 PM
nittany4, on 14 December 2012 - 10:59 AM, said:
nd the whole notion of boycotting is ridiculous. The tickets are already sold and all it is doing is showing the country that our fans are front-runners and won't stick with the team through thick and thin
#12
Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:18 AM
This season has hurt all of us and this is not to challenge anyone's "fandom" but your your boycott is misguided and will do nothing.
#14
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:55 PM
#15
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:57 PM
flyeaglesfly000, on 16 December 2012 - 09:55 PM, said:
They really should have did this ish at the beginning of the year when there was still hope.
#16
Posted 16 December 2012 - 10:42 PM
Lloyd, on 14 December 2012 - 07:48 AM, said:
If Lurie went on TV a few weeks ago and said, "Reid will return. Screw the fans." then yeah, go ahead and be angry. But we all know there's a 99% chance that he'll be gone. So what's there to boycott? Lurie already knows the team is bad...so your idea about boycotting will prove what, exactly? If the owner is aware of how bad the team is...which he is....then I fail to see where your idea is going.
That's exactly what he did last season, so by your logic, fans have every right to be angry. Lurie and the rest of the front office have run over and completely ignored the fans every chance they've gotten. They deserve every ounce of criticism they get. They got way too comfortable, and it's costing them.
#17
Posted 16 December 2012 - 10:47 PM
Innocence096, on 14 December 2012 - 04:50 PM, said:
nd the whole notion of boycotting is ridiculous. The tickets are already sold and all it is doing is showing the country that our fans are front-runners and won't stick with the team through thick and thin
I highly doubt the waiting list is anywhere near 60,000 right now. The whole notion that the fans should somehow be "thankful" for the state of the team is absolutely asinine. This team has been mired in mediocrity of the better part of a decade now. If not for two miracle playoff runs (well, one only consisted of a wild card win), they'd be in the bottom half of the league. Four playoff appearances and four misses in eight seasons since the Super Bowl loss. Two of those appearances resulted in first round losses. To pretend that somehow makes us the envy of the league is patently absurd.
#18
Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:56 AM
birdsfan15, on 16 December 2012 - 10:47 PM, said:
#19
Posted 26 December 2012 - 07:13 AM
#20
Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:48 AM
It's still grotesque, though. Sorry.
#21
Posted 26 December 2012 - 01:44 PM
Rome, on 26 December 2012 - 11:48 AM, said:
It's still grotesque, though. Sorry.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










