Settle down on Foles
#1
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:10 PM
1) Very clear that this young man is highly intelligent. He pre/post snaps reads are very good.
2) Very clear that in the short/medium range this kid CAN be very accurate. Very.
3) Very clear that he has a cannon for an arm. I'm not sure where this myth of his arm strength comes from. Wasn't it just last week where he OVERTHREW Maclin in TB?
4) Very clear that this kid has very good pocket presense.
5) Very clear that his biggest weakness is his deep ball. Fortunately, this is an issue that even our great Donovan McNabb struggled with for his first 2 seasons. By season 4, it was his strongest attribute.
6) Very clear that the young man is 'wired' the right way for this city. He's not the type to pout or mope around. He is 'fiery' but also unflappable.
7) Most importantly, HE IS A ROOKIE!
8) Very clear that he is only behind RG3 and R.Wilson for completion percentage for rookies. Wilson throws the ball less than Foles (on average) and RG3 is a boss (and plays a much simpler style of offense).
Do you guys know that we haven't had a quarterback with these attributes in 20+ years?
#2
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:26 PM
#3
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:33 PM
Ok, ok... I hear you. Good thread so far.
"What I've been more shocked with is the lack of consistency on how we see Foles. I'm not sure what you guys are watching, but Foles is going to be a star."
Wait a minute, wait a minute, WAIT A MINUTE.
Did you seriously just call the rest of us overly passionate/emotional, and then one sentence later claim that our backup QB who hasn't shown much is going to be a star?
Yeah, this thread is going to Fing suck.
"1) Very clear that this young man is highly intelligent. He pre/post snaps reads are very good."
No, actually they haven't been good. But he talks more like us white folk so he must be more intelligent than that other guy, right?
"2) Very clear that in the short/medium range this kid CAN be very accurate. Very."
Most of his INTs/near-INTs were on really short passes that he underthrew. Try again.
"3) Very clear that he has a cannon for an arm. I'm not sure where this myth of his arm strength comes from. Wasn't it just last week where he OVERTHREW Maclin in TB?"
Yeah, we really need a guy who can overthrow people. Been missing that over the last couple decades.
"4) Very clear that this kid has very good pocket presense."
I have to admit, he's really good at getting sacked.
"5) Very clear that his biggest weakness is his deep ball. Fortunately, this is an issue that even our great Donovan McNabb struggled with for his first 2 seasons. By season 4, it was his strongest attribute."
No.
"6) Very clear that the young man is 'wired' the right way for this city. He's not the type to pout or mope around. He is 'fiery' but also unflappable."
Oh yeah, he's "wired the right way."
Lmao.
You know someone sucks when people are making vague, meaningless statements like this. Racial dog whistles.
"7) Most importantly, HE IS A ROOKIE!"
Oh ok, I was wondering when you'd get to the point of your post where you completely absolve him from looking mediocre at best.
"8) Very clear that he is only behind RG3 and R.Wilson for completion percentage for rookies. Wilson throws the ball less than Foles (on average) and RG3 is a boss (and plays a much simpler style of offense)."
Right, and he's really faced some amazing pass defenses this season.
"Do you guys know that we haven't had a quarterback with these attributes in 20+ years?"
Yeah, actually we have. You literally just described every single one of our backup QB's over the last 20+ years.
#4
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:35 PM
PickFoles, on 16 December 2012 - 12:33 PM, said:
Ok, ok... I hear you. Good thread so far.
"What I've been more shocked with is the lack of consistency on how we see Foles. I'm not sure what you guys are watching, but Foles is going to be a star."
Wait a minute, wait a minute, WAIT A MINUTE.
Did you seriously just call the rest of us overly passionate/emotional, and then one sentence later claim that our backup QB who hasn't shown much is going to be a star?
Yeah, this thread is going to Fing suck.
"1) Very clear that this young man is highly intelligent. He pre/post snaps reads are very good."
No, actually they haven't been good. But he talks more like us white folk so he must be more intelligent than that other guy, right?
"2) Very clear that in the short/medium range this kid CAN be very accurate. Very."
Most of his INTs/near-INTs were on really short passes that he underthrew. Try again.
"3) Very clear that he has a cannon for an arm. I'm not sure where this myth of his arm strength comes from. Wasn't it just last week where he OVERTHREW Maclin in TB?"
Yeah, we really need a guy who can overthrow people. Been missing that over the last couple decades.
"4) Very clear that this kid has very good pocket presense."
I have to admit, he's really good at getting sacked.
"5) Very clear that his biggest weakness is his deep ball. Fortunately, this is an issue that even our great Donovan McNabb struggled with for his first 2 seasons. By season 4, it was his strongest attribute."
No.
"6) Very clear that the young man is 'wired' the right way for this city. He's not the type to pout or mope around. He is 'fiery' but also unflappable."
Oh yeah, he's "wired the right way."
Lmao.
You know someone sucks when people are making vague, meaningless statements like this. Racial dog whistles.
"7) Most importantly, HE IS A ROOKIE!"
Oh ok, I was wondering when you'd get to the point of your post where you completely absolve him from looking mediocre at best.
"8) Very clear that he is only behind RG3 and R.Wilson for completion percentage for rookies. Wilson throws the ball less than Foles (on average) and RG3 is a boss (and plays a much simpler style of offense)."
Right, and he's really faced some amazing pass defenses this season.
"Do you guys know that we haven't had a quarterback with these attributes in 20+ years?"
Yeah, actually we have. You literally just described every single one of our backup QB's over the last 20+ years.
LOL dude. You're funny.
#5
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:37 PM
Thrive, on 16 December 2012 - 12:35 PM, said:
No, what's funny is how you woke up today and decided to make a thread titled "Settle down on Foles" and then in that same thread go on to claim he's going to be a superstar based on your own gut feeling about how he's "wired".
#6
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:42 PM
PickFoles, on 16 December 2012 - 12:37 PM, said:
You struggle with feeling ignored don't you? And, yes, you're pretty funny.
#7
Posted 16 December 2012 - 02:22 PM
#8
Posted 16 December 2012 - 06:22 PM
#9
Posted 16 December 2012 - 06:24 PM
FanSinceWayBack, on 16 December 2012 - 06:22 PM, said:
Nice job making fun of an entire group of people that you don't even know how to spell correctly.
#11
Posted 16 December 2012 - 06:45 PM
#12
Posted 16 December 2012 - 06:58 PM
#13
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:04 PM
PickFoles, on 16 December 2012 - 12:37 PM, said:
#14
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:11 PM
DawkinsOwnage03, on 16 December 2012 - 06:58 PM, said:
#16
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:48 PM
#18
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:55 PM
CMPunk, on 16 December 2012 - 07:48 PM, said:
#21
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:15 PM
CMPunk, on 16 December 2012 - 07:48 PM, said:
#22
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:21 PM
#23
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:25 PM
#24
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:48 PM
- They are Vick fans
- Only post about Foles or Vick
Thats how you know there jockin hard. Theres 51 other people on the roster, not to mention FO situations, but you dont see 95% of the Vick Huggers in those threads...Hmmm I wonder why
#25
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:49 PM
Thrive, on 16 December 2012 - 12:10 PM, said:
#27
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:53 PM
CMPunk, on 16 December 2012 - 08:51 PM, said:
Ill make you a deal. Tell us how old you are and I wont flame you anymore. Scouts honor!
Ill go 1st.... Im 26
your turn
#28
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:00 PM
CMPunk, on 16 December 2012 - 08:51 PM, said:
FanSinceWayBack, on 16 December 2012 - 08:53 PM, said:
Ill go 1st.... Im 26
your turn
#30
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:09 PM
mike030270, on 16 December 2012 - 08:21 PM, said:
Because I'm like a superhero whose power is being able to rapidly find and respond to stupid threads.
L.E., on 16 December 2012 - 08:25 PM, said:
Why, so they can prove it by beating him up like a bunch of neanderthals or something?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











