Where does everyone see Fletcher Cox in 2-3 years?
Posted 20 December 2012 - 11:35 PM
Posted 20 December 2012 - 11:47 PM
Yeah, except Cox is already better now than either of those guys were in their prime.
Maybe as a situational pass rusher he's better than those guys, but Patterson ate blockers which is what enabled Cole to do what he's done and a big part of why Cole has had a down year by his career standards this season. Patterson and bunkley have also both been better BY FAR against the run. Cox has work to do as I would expect from any rookie. Its too early to tell.
Posted 21 December 2012 - 10:07 AM
Posted 21 December 2012 - 10:48 AM
Posted 21 December 2012 - 11:01 AM
Posted 21 December 2012 - 01:18 PM
Posted 21 December 2012 - 01:28 PM
Meaningless stats? Stats like sacks and tackles are meaningless? You realize Fletcher Cox is a big part of the reason why the Eagles hadn't given up 100 yards on the ground to a RB all season until the Tampa game? Stats aren't meaningless.
Unless you are saying that meaningless stats are meaningless in which case I agree with you. But those stats aren't meaningless. They are very indicative of the type of player Cox could become.
Especially if there is a chance they switch to the 3-4. I am happy with either Te'o or Lotuleilei in the top 5.
Posted 21 December 2012 - 02:49 PM
Posted 21 December 2012 - 04:39 PM
Posted 21 December 2012 - 05:02 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users