I Think Reid and Morningwood Mismanaged Vick
#1
Posted 20 December 2012 - 12:17 AM
#2
Posted 20 December 2012 - 12:45 AM
#3
Posted 20 December 2012 - 09:13 AM
#4
Posted 20 December 2012 - 10:20 AM
#5
Posted 20 December 2012 - 11:17 AM
#6
Posted 20 December 2012 - 01:12 PM
I don't know what I'm more looking forward to, never seeing Reid on the Eagles sideline again, or never again talking about anything Reid-related with regard to the Eagles.
#7
Posted 20 December 2012 - 03:36 PM
#9
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:18 PM
Runtherock, on 20 December 2012 - 12:17 AM, said:
#10
Posted 20 December 2012 - 05:33 PM
#12
Posted 21 December 2012 - 12:34 PM
#13
Posted 21 December 2012 - 02:45 PM
Unknownbird, on 21 December 2012 - 12:34 PM, said:
Vick is gone dude. Deal with it.
#14
Posted 23 December 2012 - 02:17 AM
Runtherock, on 20 December 2012 - 12:17 AM, said:
I agree. IMO, his best overall years were in ATL and they ran the ball a ton and took a lot of pressure off his shoulders. Less passing equals less hits on him with this year's o-line and with a pretty good backup as well as one of the best in the league at running the ball, I don't understand what they are trying to accomplish with him.
#15
Posted 23 December 2012 - 09:44 AM
Wyoming, on 23 December 2012 - 02:17 AM, said:
This is a passing league. I'd certainly love to run/use Shady more BUT you should't have to insulate your QB from passing. If passing isn't his strong point, then he's in the wrong profession.
#16
Posted 23 December 2012 - 10:11 AM
ckudrick, on 23 December 2012 - 09:44 AM, said:
And not the 'run around for 4-6 seconds then chuck it 40 yards' all the time either.
#17
Posted 23 December 2012 - 08:21 PM
#18
Posted 25 December 2012 - 11:53 AM
- It was Jim Mora, Jr.'s fault
- It was his friends' fault
- It was the culture's fault
- It was Marty's fault
#19
Posted 26 December 2012 - 10:09 AM
#20
Posted 26 December 2012 - 10:21 AM
DaveSpadaro, on 26 December 2012 - 10:09 AM, said:
I think the Redskins use of RG3 is more in line with how Vick should have been used. Vick in this offense is the classic round hole/square peg conundrum.
Reid and Marty thinking they could change him is like the girl dating a bad boy thinking she is going to change him.
I have to admit, I fell for it believing he could work here but history should have told us that Vick was not going to prosper running Andy-Marty's version of the WCO.
#21
Posted 26 December 2012 - 10:58 AM
DaveSpadaro, on 26 December 2012 - 10:09 AM, said:
#22
Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:14 AM
Which might make him a more dangerous QB, but I don't think translates to more wins over the long run.
They managed him fine to try to help him become a better QB - he's just missing a couple of tools (and size) to become a complete player.
#23
Posted 26 December 2012 - 12:55 PM
VaBeach_Eagle, on 20 December 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:
I've been saying since we signed that a**hole that you can't fix stupid. No one believed me.
#24
Posted 26 December 2012 - 01:18 PM
patpikunas, on 26 December 2012 - 10:21 AM, said:
Reid and Marty thinking they could change him is like the girl dating a bad boy thinking she is going to change him.
I have to admit, I fell for it believing he could work here but history should have told us that Vick was not going to prosper running Andy-Marty's version of the WCO.
Isn't that a phrase which pretty much sums up possibly the most glaring problem this coach had in his time here?
I get where you're going, but I don't agree with the Griffin comment for one reason, pat - Griffin has more smarts and 'football IQ' in his pinky fingernail than Vick has in his head. That kid is an athlete, but a complete package as well. Vick never progressed beyond the athlete part, which is why I thought this was an awful place for him to come, given The QB Guru's tendency to 'square peg/round hole' everything and everyone.
DaveSpadaro, on 26 December 2012 - 10:09 AM, said:
And when might that happen, when he's 40?
#25
Posted 26 December 2012 - 01:25 PM
mjkvol, on 26 December 2012 - 01:18 PM, said:
I get where you're going, but I don't agree with the Griffin comment for one reason, pat - Griffin has more smarts and 'football IQ' in his pinky fingernail than Vick has in his head. That kid is an athlete, but a complete package as well. Vick never progressed beyond the athlete part, which is why I thought this was an awful place for him to come, given The QB Guru's tendency to 'square peg/round hole' everything and everyone.
And when might that happen, when he's 40?
Don't know if it was a lack of intelligence/education or what, but I was surprised that Vick never improved. He DID attempt to put some energy/work into things, but they never manifested on the field. I'm guessing that the offensive scheme we used probably made it that much harder though.
#26
Posted 26 December 2012 - 01:35 PM
Operator 7, on 26 December 2012 - 01:25 PM, said:
I never wanted him here from the start, and assumed that he would simply be used as trade bait once he was 'rehabilitated', but if you're going to go with Vick, the only kind of offense that makes any sense at all is the system they used in Atlanta - pound the ball with a couple of backs, and a single read, down the field type passing game utilizing what the guy does best - throw deep and run.
The operative phrase there is highlighted, and is exactly why there was zero chance that would ever happen here.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, Op!
#27
Posted 26 December 2012 - 04:02 PM
mjkvol, on 26 December 2012 - 01:35 PM, said:
The operative phrase there is highlighted, and is exactly why there was zero chance that would ever happen here.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, Op!
Thanks, and to you and yours as well.
I think you will be receiving a special xmas gift this year.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











