How is this team going to get its franchise QB of the future
#1
Posted 21 December 2012 - 04:49 PM
Nick Foles is being given a nice test run here at the end of his rookie season. If he's the guy, then they did it by draft and developing.
Otherwise, is there any potential franchise QB available as a FA or in a trade? I don't see it.
Just kills me that for so many years, the position of QB was more often than not, one of strength on this squad, we're headed back to what I hope is not a period of mediocrity at the position that so many other teams suffer from.
#2
Posted 21 December 2012 - 05:16 PM
dmor, on 21 December 2012 - 04:49 PM, said:
Nick Foles is being given a nice test run here at the end of his rookie season. If he's the guy, then they did it by draft and developing.
Otherwise, is there any potential franchise QB available as a FA or in a trade? I don't see it.
Just kills me that for so many years, the position of QB was more often than not, one of strength on this squad, we're headed back to what I hope is not a period of mediocrity at the position that so many other teams suffer from.
#3
Posted 21 December 2012 - 05:31 PM
Better to both keep Foles and have somebody else who can play at QB.
#4
Posted 21 December 2012 - 05:37 PM
#5
Posted 21 December 2012 - 06:51 PM
#6
Posted 21 December 2012 - 07:15 PM
#7
Posted 21 December 2012 - 07:35 PM
#8
Posted 21 December 2012 - 07:52 PM
#9
Posted 21 December 2012 - 08:14 PM
#11
Posted 21 December 2012 - 08:44 PM
#13
Posted 21 December 2012 - 08:58 PM
#15
Posted 21 December 2012 - 11:12 PM
#16
Posted 21 December 2012 - 11:55 PM
D-Shiznit, on 21 December 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:
Don't like Murray (assuming he stays in school)
Bray declared (he's a headcase, but has tremendous talent)
Mettenberger?
McCarron (I like a lot, but IDK if he's an NFL franchise QB)
Thomas (bahahahahaha joke)
Boyd (joke)
that leaves Carr, Fales and Renner who I like, but not def franchise QB's at this point.
underclassmen who could declare
Bridgewater (like him a lot but he's up and down)
Driskel (we'll see if he can have a complete season)
very unlikely chance that Wittek declares.
I take a stab at Nassib in the 2nd this year if he's there and let the boys compete. If not we'll be searching for a while.
I like Kevin Hogan at Stanford a lot. I'm looking foward to watching him develop throughout his college career.
#17
Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:05 AM
#18
Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:07 AM
mwz1970, on 22 December 2012 - 12:05 AM, said:
#19
Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:17 AM
blindside, on 21 December 2012 - 07:52 PM, said:
Ok blindside, you must've spent some time in Tucson to dig up that article. Foles isn't a flashy player who wears Superman socks and promises to carry his ishy team to the playoffs. He IS a solid pocket passer who will deliver the ball behind a solid line. I cringed when Foles was drafted by Philly. Foles is in danger of being ruined like Jake Locker.
#20
Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:17 AM
#21
Posted 22 December 2012 - 12:25 AM
RSAZ, on 22 December 2012 - 12:17 AM, said:
#23
Posted 22 December 2012 - 01:04 AM
RSAZ, on 22 December 2012 - 12:17 AM, said:
Baloney. Foles has handled himself relatively well, all things considered, being a banged up OL. The OL has every opportunity to be a good line next year when its starters are healthy.
#24
Posted 22 December 2012 - 07:37 AM
dmor, on 21 December 2012 - 05:31 PM, said:
Better to both keep Foles and have somebody else who can play at QB.
What makes you think Foles would be any happier being someones back up than what Vick is? Just because the Vick fans think he should be content with a back up role. Doesn't mean he would be...and shouldn't be. And given the abilities he has demonstrated thus far,that's not likely to happen...for him, or for Vick.
#26
Posted 22 December 2012 - 07:51 AM
#27
Posted 22 December 2012 - 08:06 AM
mwz1970, on 22 December 2012 - 12:05 AM, said:
#28
Posted 22 December 2012 - 08:16 AM
RSAZ, on 22 December 2012 - 12:17 AM, said:
Not much in that area has changed for Nick since being inserted as the QB here. Yet he is enduring. Just as he did then.
#30
Posted 22 December 2012 - 09:53 AM
dmor, on 21 December 2012 - 05:31 PM, said:
Better to both keep Foles and have somebody else who can play at QB.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











