Is the Rooney rule still needed
#1
Posted 01 January 2013 - 03:50 PM
#2
Posted 01 January 2013 - 04:00 PM
yeah, they should probably keep it around for awhile.
#3
Posted 01 January 2013 - 04:05 PM
djbigf, on 01 January 2013 - 04:00 PM, said:
yeah, they should probably keep it around for awhile.
If you have one, you should have the other
#4
Posted 01 January 2013 - 04:07 PM
christsmith99, on 01 January 2013 - 04:05 PM, said:
If you have one, you should have the other
#6
Posted 01 January 2013 - 04:17 PM
Some people always have race on their mind, so whenever they look at a situation they have to look at it in terms of color. How many white players on are this team? How many black coaches are on that team? Who the F cares?
#7
Posted 01 January 2013 - 04:20 PM
Sack that QB, on 01 January 2013 - 04:17 PM, said:
Some people always have race on their mind, so whenever they look at a situation they have to look at it in terms of color. How many white players on are this team? How many black coaches are on that team? Who the F cares?
#12
Posted 01 January 2013 - 06:54 PM
djbigf, on 01 January 2013 - 04:00 PM, said:
yeah, they should probably keep it around for awhile.
#16
Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:42 PM
#17
Posted 01 January 2013 - 11:29 PM
#20
Posted 02 January 2013 - 01:40 AM
djbigf, on 01 January 2013 - 04:00 PM, said:
yeah, they should probably keep it around for awhile.
#23
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:12 AM
Although there have been instances (can't think right now) where teams interviewed a black coach just for the rule, but wound up really liking what they heard from them during the process.
#24
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:25 AM
EagleJoe8, on 02 January 2013 - 09:10 AM, said:
I'm a white male. I have never really been a part of being or on the negative end of racism. I can't pretend to understand it the same way someone who has experienced it first hand. The way I see it is historically my specific demographic had an easier time doing almost anything. There have to be steps taken like the Rodney Rule to bring the system back into balance. If you say that we are already balanced I'd think otherwise because there are many minority coordinators, but only a small number of actual head coaches. Logically that just doesn't make sense.
#25
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:37 AM
djbigf, on 01 January 2013 - 04:00 PM, said:
yeah, they should probably keep it around for awhile.
In a league where 69% of the 2012 HCs were not former NFL players (and 2 that were Whisenhunt and Smith got canned), what does the percentage of minority PLAYERS in the NFL even have to do with it since it's obvious that owners/GMs prefer to not hire former players as HCs regardless of ethnicity?
Actually there were more minority HCs in the NFL last season who were not former players than there were who did play in the league.
#26
Posted 02 January 2013 - 10:55 AM
Pegger, on 02 January 2013 - 10:25 AM, said:
That's actually the point of it. Traditionally minority coaches wouldn't even get an interview. Granted many won't get the job, but there's still the perception that that individual is a candidate and there's always the chance that that specific candidate becomes the best fit (like Mike Tomlin in Pitt).
I'm a white male. I have never really been a part of being or on the negative end of racism. I can't pretend to understand it the same way someone who has experienced it first hand. The way I see it is historically my specific demographic had an easier time doing almost anything. There have to be steps taken like the Rodney Rule to bring the system back into balance. If you say that we are already balanced I'd think otherwise because there are many minority coordinators, but only a small number of actual head coaches. Logically that just doesn't make sense.
Having many minority coordinators doesn't mean many earned interviews. Ray Horton and Winston Moss are 2 that come to mind, and I believe Moss interviewed for the Oakland job last year, and Horton interviewed for the AZ job yesterday. Who else is so deserving that overlooking them is an issue?
#27
Posted 02 January 2013 - 11:24 AM
MightyJNC, on 02 January 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:
In a league where 69% of the 2012 HCs were not former NFL players (and 2 that were Whisenhunt and Smith got canned), what does the percentage of minority PLAYERS in the NFL even have to do with it since it's obvious that owners/GMs prefer to not hire former players as HCs regardless of ethnicity?
Actually there were more minority HCs in the NFL last season who were not former players than there were who did play in the league.
I anxiously await DJnumbnuts' response to this.
(It's nice not being the target of Mighty's wrath for a change.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











