DaveSpadaro, on 08 January 2013 - 09:43 AM, said:
Outside Analysis
#31
Posted 08 January 2013 - 03:39 PM
#32
Posted 08 January 2013 - 06:21 PM
1- The numerous holes in the starting lineup.
2- With so many holes in the starting lineup, the backups are also bad.
3- Herremans and Peters. Both are 30 yrs old. Due to issues 1 and 2, It's possible this team will take 3-4 years to really get this turned around. Olineman tend to have long careers but do they really maintain a high level of play at this point?
#33
Posted 08 January 2013 - 06:41 PM
Highboy, on 08 January 2013 - 02:55 PM, said:
I don't feel like checking the numbers but I wouldn't be surprised if Maclin played more games and was more productive than Djax certainly over the last 2 years.
#34
Posted 08 January 2013 - 07:04 PM
CT Eagle, on 08 January 2013 - 06:41 PM, said:
I don't feel like checking the numbers but I wouldn't be surprised if Maclin played more games and was more productive than Djax certainly over the last 2 years.
Jackson had over a thousand yards receiving even supposedly in is "down year" when he wasn't "really trying. Considering he was a mid second round pick and Maclin was a first round pick who has yet to gain 1,000 yards receiving even one time, I'd say Jackson has been more productive. Maclin will have monster games where he gets double digit receptions for triple digit yardage and some tds, and then limp off the field after one or two catches the next. Not saying I want rid of him, I'd keep them both.
#35
Posted 08 January 2013 - 07:58 PM
#36
Posted 08 January 2013 - 08:07 PM
Highboy, on 08 January 2013 - 07:04 PM, said:
#37
Posted 08 January 2013 - 09:27 PM
CT Eagle, on 08 January 2013 - 08:07 PM, said:
Get a legit big WR and put Jackson in the slot where he belongs, and both he and Maclin will be what we always hoped they would be. And for crying out loud, have Jackson return punts again. Enough with the idiocy - use these two correctly and they will thrive.
I've become convinced that the problem with talent underperforming here has more to do with how they were used than the talent simply being subpar, which is the crap we were fed by Spadaro et al after the 'coaches' had determined that they had 'failed'. We see the obvious 'square peg / round hole' disasters like Gocong, Simineau, and Considine, where the players were ripped and run out of town instead of the idiot who put them in position to fail. Then there is Greg Lewis returning punts, linemen playing fullback, a halfback told to play fullback, Brandon Graham stuck at DT as a rookie, etc., etc.
When we hopefully get competent people in here, I can't wait to see some of the talent we had written off start to play the way we hoped they would when they were drafted. The shame is all the ones that may have gotten away while we wasted the last several years.
#38
Posted 08 January 2013 - 09:28 PM
CT Eagle, on 08 January 2013 - 08:07 PM, said:
I'm with you, but I'd like to see how they do with consistent QB play and a sane offensive approach.
#40
Posted 08 January 2013 - 10:23 PM
mjkvol, on 08 January 2013 - 09:27 PM, said:
I've become convinced that the problem with talent underperforming here has more to do with how they were used than the talent simply being subpar, which is the crap we were fed by Spadaro et al after the 'coaches' had determined that they had 'failed'. We see the obvious 'square peg / round hole' disasters like Gocong, Simineau, and Considine, where the players were ripped and run out of town instead of the idiot who put them in position to fail. Then there is Greg Lewis returning punts, linemen playing fullback, a halfback told to play fullback, Brandon Graham stuck at DT as a rookie, etc., etc.
When we hopefully get competent people in here, I can't wait to see some of the talent we had written off start to play the way we hoped they would when they were drafted. The shame is all the ones that may have gotten away while we wasted the last several years.
I think Reid became stale along with the offense. Honestly Reid lost his fire and the team is a reflection of his coach. Comfortable...not young and hungry
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











