Vick is all but gone...unless he does a major overhaul on his current contract. If he mans up and wants a reasonable deal then I am not oppossed to letting compete for the starting job. He needs to understand his limitations and play to his strengths. Unfortunately, he has a limited ceiling this point in his career. Foles has bigger upside but needs to learn the nuances of being an "NFL QB." I prefer Foles. If Vick wants to redo his deal and compete then I am fine with that. If Vick thinks he should be a starter then either cut him or trade him.
[News] Offseason Preview: Quarterback
31 replies to this topic
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:47 PM
We need a playmaker at qb and right now there is none in our locker room. Foles is an AR project and not very attractive to any of the coaches that are interviewing. Prepare for a new qb to come in and take over.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users