the truth about our secondary...
#1
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:41 AM
The safeties...while both allen and coleman are not working out they are at least suitable back ups. Colt anderson is a very good special teams player. I think allen will be kept but i would draft two safeties this year and let the best four make the team and the best two start.
The corners...a much more difficult equation to really evaluate. Drc has shown has flashes of being great and flashes of not caring but the talent is there. Nmandi ...has he lost four steps since being considered the second best corner in the league? Either way with an actual defense scheme and his willingness to take a pay cut i see no reason why you don't bring him back. I think you have to bring them both back contrary to most views simply because you are not likely at all to get an nfl ready cornerback outside of round 1 in the draft. Where we are picking in the draft i think the pick has to go to the O or the Dline (preferably star or joeckel).
If we went corner in round 2 where are we going to get our safeties since we realistically need 2 of them? What about our D or oline if we went corner in round 1? We can't just plug in more big name free agents. That's what got us into this mess. That's why i would let nmamdi compete with marsh for the starting job and may the best man win. Keep drc as well. Boykin should be getting better in the middle and we have good depth at the position already beyond that. That allows us to address safety in rounds 2 through 4 with multiple picks and i said let the best two win !! Now after next year if the cb play is still suspect and if foles proves to be a keeper it will be the obvious that we go after corner in at least round 1 if not 1 and 2. The point is this secondary mess isn't a one year fix and we can't just dump all four player and expect to get upgrades.
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:51 AM
#3
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:52 AM
#4
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:56 AM
I don't think we can afford to lose both Namdi and DRC. Maybe one but not both. Honesty I think we do what we can to keep as many HOLES filled as possible at least going into camp. Let them all compete, draft BPA for the future and start the model over with a coach who can actually design a game plan and scheme suited to his players strengths.
#5
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:00 PM
#6
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:07 PM
BDAWK_4EVER, on 14 January 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:
i agree and i really think our defense was so confused by the middle of the year on their assignments that nobody knew their right from the left. I also think the quickest way to improve your seconday is by improving your dline. I'm hoping star will still be there (i think joeckel is going #1 to andy). Their are a plethora of good 2nd and 3rd round safety prospects and i do think we should go after two of them. Even if we traded down and took rhodes or millner in truth it isn't likely that either will be a first year upgrade over what we already have. In the future definitely but we play in a division where both the redskins and giants keys to offensive success rely on their running game. To me having star,cox,cole,and grahm with jenkins/dixon/hunt/curry rotating would be of far more immediate and long term impact.
#7
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:13 PM
bobbywizdum, on 14 January 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:
i agree and i really think our defense was so confused by the middle of the year on their assignments that nobody knew their right from the left. I also think the quickest way to improve your seconday is by improving your dline. I'm hoping star will still be there (i think joeckel is going #1 to andy). Their are a plethora of good 2nd and 3rd round safety prospects and i do think we should go after two of them. Even if we traded down and took rhodes or millner in truth it isn't likely that either will be a first year upgrade over what we already have. In the future definitely but we play in a division where both the redskins and giants keys to offensive success rely on their running game. To me having star,cox,cole,and grahm with jenkins/dixon/hunt/curry rotating would be of far more immediate and long term impact.
#8
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:16 PM
bobbywizdum, on 14 January 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:
i agree and i really think our defense was so confused by the middle of the year on their assignments that nobody knew their right from the left. I also think the quickest way to improve your seconday is by improving your dline.
#9
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:29 PM
bobbywizdum, on 14 January 2013 - 11:41 AM, said:
The safeties...while both allen and coleman are not working out they are at least suitable back ups. Colt anderson is a very good special teams player. I think allen will be kept but i would draft two safeties this year and let the best four make the team and the best two start.
The corners...a much more difficult equation to really evaluate. Drc has shown has flashes of being great and flashes of not caring but the talent is there. Nmandi ...has he lost four steps since being considered the second best corner in the league? Either way with an actual defense scheme and his willingness to take a pay cut i see no reason why you don't bring him back. I think you have to bring them both back contrary to most views simply because you are not likely at all to get an nfl ready cornerback outside of round 1 in the draft. Where we are picking in the draft i think the pick has to go to the O or the Dline (preferably star or joeckel).
If we went corner in round 2 where are we going to get our safeties since we realistically need 2 of them? What about our D or oline if we went corner in round 1? We can't just plug in more big name free agents. That's what got us into this mess. That's why i would let nmamdi compete with marsh for the starting job and may the best man win. Keep drc as well. Boykin should be getting better in the middle and we have good depth at the position already beyond that. That allows us to address safety in rounds 2 through 4 with multiple picks and i said let the best two win !! Now after next year if the cb play is still suspect and if foles proves to be a keeper it will be the obvious that we go after corner in at least round 1 if not 1 and 2. The point is this secondary mess isn't a one year fix and we can't just dump all four player and expect to get upgrades.
Thoughts?
the other possibility is to trade down and get a Safety in the First round... there's the Kid from Florida and Reid from LSU... Reid reminds me a bit of Dawkins ( Just my opinion)... and there will probably be more candidates at that position after the Combine... the trade down would also stockpile picks for this year and maybe a second #1 for next year... Combined with a defensive scheme that actually plays to the STRENGTHS of the guys we have here... I think the team will be good.
#10
Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:57 PM
I think the team needs to keep one, I'd prefer DRC, but no guarantees
#11
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:00 PM
#12
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:04 PM
baldawgbites, on 14 January 2013 - 12:29 PM, said:
i know we certainly need safety help i just think we have to take advantage of picking in the top 5 for the first time since 99. We've got to get an impact stud. I think we could still get a safety in the second and 3rd or if we want elam or eid bad enough we could actually trade up from our high second into the first to get them as well. that being said if star and joeckel are both off the board imo there is noone else really worth taking that high. If we did miss out on star and joeckel i would probably trade down a few spots and go after matthews or that other high rated tackle and then we would have two seconds and a world of possibilities that way as well.
#14
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:17 PM
bobbywizdum, on 14 January 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:
#15
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:20 PM
nottsfootballfan, on 14 January 2013 - 12:57 PM, said:
I think the team needs to keep one, I'd prefer DRC, but no guarantees
#16
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:26 PM
#17
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:29 PM
WaitingForSomeday, on 14 January 2013 - 01:17 PM, said:
#19
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:52 PM
bobbywizdum, on 14 January 2013 - 01:29 PM, said:
#20
Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:57 PM
macgregor, on 14 January 2013 - 01:52 PM, said:
not sure how we could end up with a mid first and a late third rounder....
that being said my top choice is to draft star but if him and joeckel aren't there at #4 you do have to consider trading back. Who else is really worth the top four pick in our current state? millner? jones? i wouldn't gamble on that.
#21
Posted 14 January 2013 - 02:03 PM
bobbywizdum, on 14 January 2013 - 01:57 PM, said:
that being said my top choice is to draft star but if him and joeckel aren't there at #4 you do have to consider trading back. Who else is really worth the top four pick in our current state? millner? jones? i wouldn't gamble on that.
#22
Posted 14 January 2013 - 02:18 PM
macgregor, on 14 January 2013 - 02:03 PM, said:
macgregor, on 14 January 2013 - 02:03 PM, said:
a guard? you are taking a guard in the top 5 !!!!
#23
Posted 14 January 2013 - 02:23 PM
bobbywizdum, on 14 January 2013 - 02:18 PM, said:
a guard? you are taking a guard in the top 5 !!!!
#24
Posted 14 January 2013 - 02:24 PM
macgregor, on 14 January 2013 - 02:23 PM, said:
he's projected to get picked from 15-20....how in the world would that be bpa at 4? You don't pay guards top four money ever !!!
#27
Posted 14 January 2013 - 02:36 PM
macgregor, on 14 January 2013 - 02:30 PM, said:
i'm glad you get to be on the expert pannel of actually doing rankings that people listen to. But seriously....who besides you has him ranked in the top ten let alone the top 3?
LaxPlayerX3, on 14 January 2013 - 02:30 PM, said:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











