Tebow
#1
Posted 15 January 2013 - 01:13 AM
I am so happy to see Peyton go down.
Ooooooops!
#2
Posted 15 January 2013 - 01:28 AM
Chiefs scored 8 - Green passed for 107 and 2 picks.
Ravens scored 6 - McNair passed for 173 and 2 picks.
Pats scored 31 (24 without the pick 6) - would have been the only challenge.
Bears scored 17 (and gave up a pick 6) - Grossman threw for 165 and 2 picks.
The Colts ran for 604 yards in those 4 games.
They gave up 331 rushing yards.
Yeah, it was all Peyton.
How do you win a SB with a sub par QB who launches 7 INTs and 3 TDs?
The opposing QBs put up 7 INTs and 3 TDs as well.
#3
Posted 15 January 2013 - 05:25 AM
skippyx, on 15 January 2013 - 01:28 AM, said:
Chiefs scored 8 - Green passed for 107 and 2 picks.
Ravens scored 6 - McNair passed for 173 and 2 picks.
Pats scored 31 (24 without the pick 6) - would have been the only challenge.
Bears scored 17 (and gave up a pick 6) - Grossman threw for 165 and 2 picks.
The Colts ran for 604 yards in those 4 games.
They gave up 331 rushing yards.
Yeah, it was all Peyton.
How do you win a SB with a sub par QB who launches 7 INTs and 3 TDs?
The opposing QBs put up 7 INTs and 3 TDs as well.
You think the Colts would have won the 06 Super Bowl without Peyton Manning?
#4
Posted 15 January 2013 - 07:59 AM
#5
Posted 15 January 2013 - 11:22 AM
axe_man_trotter, on 15 January 2013 - 07:59 AM, said:
#6
Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:43 PM
Froggy, on 15 January 2013 - 05:25 AM, said:
Yes, I do as well. Manning didnt put up huge #s throgh that postseason... he didnt need to either. Only the NE game would have been the only game IMO that they might have possibally needed Peyton IMO
axe_man_trotter, on 15 January 2013 - 07:59 AM, said:
He would be better suited as a Preacher IMO
#7
Posted 15 January 2013 - 01:11 PM
bumpy93, on 15 January 2013 - 12:43 PM, said:
You can say that about MANY teams and quarterbacks. Did the Steelers 'need' Bradshaw? No. Did the Cowboys 'need' Aikman? No. But they ere the QBs that won those Super Bowls, and so was Manning. Those hypothetical situations where 'the Colts could have won without Manning' are useless because you don't know how the team would be structured without those players. You don't know if those teams would be as good without those players.
#8
Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:15 PM
#9
Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:40 PM
zenclaybourne, on 15 January 2013 - 11:22 AM, said:
#11
Posted 15 January 2013 - 05:05 PM
bumpy93, on 15 January 2013 - 12:43 PM, said:
He would be better suited as a Preacher IMO
#14
Posted 16 January 2013 - 06:53 AM
#16
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:53 AM
skippyx, on 15 January 2013 - 01:28 AM, said:
Chiefs scored 8 - Green passed for 107 and 2 picks.
Ravens scored 6 - McNair passed for 173 and 2 picks.
Pats scored 31 (24 without the pick 6) - would have been the only challenge.
Bears scored 17 (and gave up a pick 6) - Grossman threw for 165 and 2 picks.
The Colts ran for 604 yards in those 4 games.
They gave up 331 rushing yards.
Yeah, it was all Peyton.
How do you win a SB with a sub par QB who launches 7 INTs and 3 TDs?
The opposing QBs put up 7 INTs and 3 TDs as well.
I just know they embarassed the 06' Garcia led Eagles on MNF
#17
Posted 17 January 2013 - 05:51 PM
#20
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:36 PM
#22
Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:29 AM
christsmith99, on 16 January 2013 - 07:07 PM, said:
I promise you, if he gets the FO to go and trade for Tim Tebow as our starting QB I will call for him to be fired right then and there and it he isnt I will become a fan of another team until he and Tebow are both gone from my beloved Eagles.
#24
Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:06 AM
#25
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:46 AM
#26
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:48 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












