[News] Chip Kelly Named New Head Coach
#31
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:50 PM
#32
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:51 PM
#33
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:55 PM
#34
Posted 16 January 2013 - 01:56 PM
#35
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:03 PM
#36
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:12 PM
#37
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:34 PM
#38
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:34 PM
I still don't see negotiating as a joke. Obviously, Lurie didn't either. In the end, he got the one that the Eagles clearly seemed to be targeting all along--the only one who had a 9-hour first interview.
We want someone with fight to get what he wants--both Lurie and Kelly demonstrated that. We need an innovator--particularly when our red-zone offense has really stunk the last bunch of years. I don't care that we march up and down the field. If we can't punch it in, it doesn't matter.
I'd love to see a strong DC come in to support him. But, Washington, and some other teams, showed you can win with a questionable defense--as long as your offense can control the game.
Bradley might become a great HC somewhere. Same with McCoy. Time will also tell on them, as well--no guarantee that since they were good coordinators they will be good head coaches. Plenty of carnage to support that theory.
I'm not sure that Vick is the answer going forward. Foles may fit well into Kelly's plans or may not. It will be interesting to see what happens. I though Smith decided to stay another year, so I don't think that is an option to worry about. I'd like to get a big receiver, but we need help on the defensive side of the ball--particularly at safety. Haven't had a great one since they let BDawk go.
They are all 2nd lieutenants until they prove themselves in battle--whether they were brought up in the NFL or brought up from a college program. The challenge is getting one on the upswing, not one past their prime.
Gruden would have been exciting--because of the personality; but he got that ring following a program Dungy put together and then they went downhill. I, for one, am hoping that we are going to be getting better and better over time (at least for a good while).
Would love to have Bradley as DC, but don't think he's going to leave Seattle. Also keep in mind that some teams have beaten his defense pretty badly. Had RG3 not gotten hurt, the Redskins were running away with that game, then the Falcons came in and scorched that defense. Even when the seahawks came back offensively, the defense couldn't hold the falcons for less than a minute. Not sure I'd be jumping up and down demanding that Bradley, as HC, was what our defense needed. It will be interesting to see who comes in as DC to support Kelly as HC. I don't think it can be who we currently have, if we want to see a defensive change next year.
#39
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:34 PM
#40
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:40 PM
#41
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:47 PM
If Kelly is who Lurie describes him to be, it won't be just gimmicks. And, offensively, we have a lot of weapons that most teams only dream about. We just need a guy who knows how to use them. We'll get to see if Kelly is that guy or if he is set in his ways as Reid. Time will tell.
Since you can't do anything about it, why not wait until he gives you a reason--on the NFL field--to complain.
To say that he can't win against someone good is just an embarrassment to you. I won't even touch that. That would be like saying that Saban wasn't a good coach because they got beat by Texas A&M or that Bradley stunk as a DC because his defense lost the game for Seattle or that McCoy was a bad OC because they lost their last game. I mean really, think about what you are saying.
#42
Posted 16 January 2013 - 02:51 PM
#43
Posted 16 January 2013 - 03:15 PM
#44
Posted 16 January 2013 - 03:23 PM
#45
Posted 16 January 2013 - 04:27 PM
#46
Posted 16 January 2013 - 06:22 PM
#47
Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:30 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










