What does ATNFL think about the Chip Kelly hire?
#1
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:15 PM
How does this affect the NFC East going forward, if at all?
I was on the fence about it in the beginning and still think he seems to be somewhat of a weirdo and a flake but lot of people I respect think it was a great move.
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:20 PM
#3
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:36 PM
Just sucks, seems to me the cerebral element of the game is starting to dwindle, and it's just gonna be about instincts and athleticism.
#4
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:38 PM
Gmen2005, on 16 January 2013 - 07:20 PM, said:
#5
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:38 PM
Brady runs a very similar system in NE and he's no athlete. Obviously Foles isnt Brady but mobility wise and height wise they are similar so it could work.
Supposedly Kelly can design several different offenses too and not just the gimmicky stuff.
I'm hoping he brings an OC in with NFL experience just in case to help him with the transition.
#6
Posted 16 January 2013 - 08:00 PM
#7
Posted 16 January 2013 - 09:40 PM
Also, as was already mentioned, I'm not sure Foles is the type of QB to run his offense. I saw Oregon go 3 and out in 40 seconds more than once. Very fast, up-tempo
We'll find out soon enough
#8
Posted 16 January 2013 - 09:49 PM
Froggy, on 16 January 2013 - 07:36 PM, said:
Just sucks, seems to me the cerebral element of the game is starting to dwindle, and it's just gonna be about instincts and athleticism.
My position on Kelly? It's about the boldest move Lurie could have made and given the current state of the team I'm okay with a bold move. Hell, things can't get much worse. Obviously when meeting with Chip Kelly, Mr. Lurie was sold on a lot more than just Oregon's fancy offensive playbook. Everyone knows a lot of that Oregon crap won't work in the NFL. Lurie must be confident that Kelly can adjust and modify his offense and most of all he must believe he's a great leader.
#9
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:37 PM
for him and bolts back to college.
#10
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:29 AM
faceman, on 16 January 2013 - 10:37 PM, said:
for him and bolts back to college.
I do worry he stays a couple seasons and bounces though.
#11
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:34 AM
Froggy, on 16 January 2013 - 07:36 PM, said:
Just sucks, seems to me the cerebral element of the game is starting to dwindle, and it's just gonna be about instincts and athleticism.
Cerebral element will always be there. I for one don't mind the movement towards an athletic QB. My issue is the defensive rules, particularly the overly called defensive PI. Sick of seeing WR throw their hands up every single time. The D in the NFL just has no chance with the rule set.
#12
Posted 17 January 2013 - 03:25 AM
faceman, on 16 January 2013 - 10:37 PM, said:
for him and bolts back to college.
Being Petrinoed is my fear. Kelly accepted the Bucs job, then flipped. Spoke to the Browns and seemed to be heading there, flopped to the Eagles and seemed to be coming here and then flipped back to college. 2 weeks later he's flopped back to the Eagles.
Will he flip back to college in a year? I hope not, but it's definitely a valid concern.
#13
Posted 17 January 2013 - 05:26 AM
#14
Posted 17 January 2013 - 05:38 AM
It seems like he took the job to avoid the incoming sanctions against the Ducks more than actually wanting to coach in Philly. Wouldn't expect him to stick around for long.
#15
Posted 17 January 2013 - 06:00 AM
faceman, on 16 January 2013 - 10:37 PM, said:
for him and bolts back to college.
That is my biggest concern. I'm not worried about his ability as a coach. I do have concerns about his commitment to the NFL.
#16
Posted 17 January 2013 - 07:21 AM
Of course Wilkinson didn't even make it to the end of '79 - and Kelly might not make it to the end of 2014.
#17
Posted 17 January 2013 - 08:01 AM
VaBeach_Eagle, on 17 January 2013 - 03:25 AM, said:
Being Petrinoed is my fear. Kelly accepted the Bucs job, then flipped. Spoke to the Browns and seemed to be heading there, flopped to the Eagles and seemed to be coming here and then flipped back to college. 2 weeks later he's flopped back to the Eagles.
Will he flip back to college in a year? I hope not, but it's definitely a valid concern.
I definitely agree about Spurrier. I knew he was destined for failure when he made that comment about NFL coaches putting in too much time
at the office. Bobby Petrino is also a scumbag as a person Imo. I don't believe Kelly is similar in personality or work ethic with either. From what
I've heard he's a workaholic willing to put in the time to do the job. Nick Saban probably would have been a better comparison.
Coaches like Saban,Kelly,Les Miles,Mack Brown and a few others have it made in college. They can recruit most any player they want. They also
don't have to worry about getting fired. In the NFL a coach is 3 consecutive losses away from total mutiny. In college, you can miss on a few
recruits and not miss a lick. If you miss on a precious draft choice in the NFL it could set your team back for years.
Froggy- I don't see the NFL being taken over by dual threat QB's anytime soon. Teams will still invest a lot of their cap room on the position. They
need him to stay healthy if they want to enjoy success over the long haul. RG3 is a good example of what can happen if that team relies on his
running ability too much. Sooner or later, Def. coordinators throughout the league will find better ways to defend the read option and force these
athletic type Qb's to beat them from the pocket.
#19
Posted 17 January 2013 - 08:21 AM
Gmen4ever, on 16 January 2013 - 09:40 PM, said:
He has 11 years experience as an NFL defensive coach, 8 as a DL coach (Ind, Hou, Dal) and 3 as a DC (Cleveland).
#20
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:26 AM
Gmen4ever, on 16 January 2013 - 09:40 PM, said:
Also, as was already mentioned, I'm not sure Foles is the type of QB to run his offense. I saw Oregon go 3 and out in 40 seconds more than once. Very fast, up-tempo
We'll find out soon enough
#21
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:44 AM
KzEaglefan86, on 17 January 2013 - 09:26 AM, said:
If he is as successful here, as he was at New Hamshire and than Oregon, than I'll have a hard time thinking he would bolt back to the collage ranks.
#22
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:37 AM
Froggy, on 16 January 2013 - 07:36 PM, said:
Just sucks, seems to me the cerebral element of the game is starting to dwindle, and it's just gonna be about instincts and athleticism.
The "running QB" hasn't made any inroads into making a deep run in the playoffs or winning a super bowl......3 of the 4 conference championship teams have traditional drop back QB's and chances are, 2 of them will play in the super bowl. Running QB's are exciting and put up big numbers, only to follow it up will a mistake filled game and a loss......the consistency isn't there. Kaepernick is a media favorite right now, but we've seen this before with vick, vince young...etc.
I think the traditional pocket QB who can move around in the pocket and pick apart a defense will never be replaced.....
#24
Posted 17 January 2013 - 01:20 PM
#25
Posted 17 January 2013 - 01:28 PM
rich36, on 17 January 2013 - 01:20 PM, said:
#26
Posted 17 January 2013 - 02:26 PM
#28
Posted 17 January 2013 - 04:14 PM
Gmen4ever, on 17 January 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:
#29
Posted 17 January 2013 - 04:17 PM
LesDawg1978, on 17 January 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:
And it's also very possible I can get a handy from Ms. Alabama tonight--VERY unlikely, but not totally out of the question...
KzEaglefan86, on 17 January 2013 - 04:14 PM, said:
#30
Posted 17 January 2013 - 04:29 PM
Gmen4ever, on 16 January 2013 - 09:40 PM, said:
Also, as was already mentioned, I'm not sure Foles is the type of QB to run his offense. I saw Oregon go 3 and out in 40 seconds more than once. Very fast, up-tempo
We'll find out soon enough
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












