Sweating the DC hire.....
#1
Posted 18 January 2013 - 04:01 PM
Are they doing a "search" or is it more of a case of someone Kelly already knows and is comfortable with ?
Please tell me they are considering all options (aka Ray Horton).
#2
Posted 18 January 2013 - 04:08 PM
#3
Posted 18 January 2013 - 04:11 PM
#5
Posted 18 January 2013 - 04:52 PM
We were all psyched when Jim Washburn and Howard Mudd were hired. How did that turn out?
#6
Posted 18 January 2013 - 05:01 PM
dmor, on 18 January 2013 - 04:52 PM, said:
We were all psyched when Jim Washburn and Howard Mudd were hired. How did that turn out?
Absolutely true ..... well, some of us were psyched. I didn't get the obsession over line coaches then, and still don't. Coordinators are a different story.
#7
Posted 18 January 2013 - 05:43 PM
#8
Posted 18 January 2013 - 06:04 PM
#9
Posted 18 January 2013 - 06:31 PM
That's fine and all but I don't want the whole staff to be new to the NFL college coaches. A good mix would be nice. I do like the addition of the nutritionist from OU being the assistant GM or whatever title they gave him here.
I also love that that Kelly is all about building a program, similar to OU, where everything from what you eat, how you practice, and how you play is accounted for. Now I am sure all teams have some monitor and programs for nutrition but this guy comes with high praise.
PRAYING ALL THIS TRANSFERS TO ON THE FIELD SUCCESS!
#10
Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:35 PM
badmeetsevil, on 18 January 2013 - 06:31 PM, said:
I also love that that Kelly is all about building a program, similar to OU, where everything from what you eat, how you practice, and how you play is accounted for.
I think it's terrific. As I said in a thread in TATE, I think this will go a long way to helping fix up a lot of the entitlement issues that have plagued this team for the last few years.
It also shows that Kelly is really in this thing. He's putting a great deal of thought into restructuring the entire football operations in all aspects. Something that was sorely needed.
#11
Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:12 AM
KOJO, on 18 January 2013 - 11:35 PM, said:
It also shows that Kelly is really in this thing. He's putting a great deal of thought into restructuring the entire football operations in all aspects. Something that was sorely needed.
It was clearly a huge success in college. I hope it can translate into the pros. It is hard to make a 29 year old millionaire with a 2 year guarantee eat what you tell him too. There aren't too many divas in the NCAA and every team in the NFL has a couple.
#16
Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:10 PM
mjkvol, on 19 January 2013 - 03:58 PM, said:
Rex is actually a good coach. sorta...
#20
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:20 AM
VaBeach_Eagle, on 19 January 2013 - 10:40 PM, said:
And yet so many fans were worried Howie would *********FORCE********** the new head coach to keep Marty. I wish some of you loved the Phillies. I don't have this "paranoia" instinct anymore. Part of my dream came true in 2008. I'm not as cynical, especially now that "times yours" is going to the midwest to make them a playoff team. More power to Andy Reid!! The Phillies winning in 2008 has cleared a lot of hate personally.
#21
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:21 AM
Iggles, on 20 January 2013 - 01:20 AM, said:
What came true in 2008?
#22
Posted 20 January 2013 - 02:00 AM
VaBeach_Eagle, on 20 January 2013 - 01:21 AM, said:
What came true in 2008?
It's lost on you.... it's a sport called major league baseball. The sport I really fell in love with first before the NFL when I was eight in 1979. I've seen two World Series championships in my lifetime. It keeps me sane. I remember when the Phillies won the 2008 World Series, and how I felt. Would I feel better if the Eagles finally pulled it off?? I don't know.
#24
Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:38 AM
VaBeach_Eagle, on 20 January 2013 - 02:09 AM, said:
That's ok, nobody's perfect....at least you're supporing the correct football team...
#25
Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:44 AM
#26
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:30 AM
PoconoDon, on 20 January 2013 - 08:44 AM, said:
That's essentially what he said in his PC, that it would be an 'attacking' defense. He said he wants that in all three phases, in fact.
I agree - it matters much less what the specific scheme is than the idea of doing whatever is necessary to get stops, and fitting the system to the talent on hand. I'd personally love to see an approach that is a hybrid 3-4/4-3 depending on situations, kind of like the Ravens use. or something like Carroll's 4-3 Under scheme, but right now the secondary isn't close to being the type necessary. Had we taken Earl Thomas, and then drafted Milliner this year, we'd be half way to the kind of big, physical secondary needed for that.
Whatever it is, just make it physical and nasty. On that note, it is imperative that the Linc becomes a place teams fear coming into - we'll never see anything like the Vet again (unfortunately), but maybe Chip can develop something close to that. I wish the Linc had never been built, and we still played at that old dump - what an awesome home advantage.
But, then Lurie would have a few less sheckles in his bank account. Oh well.
#27
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:22 AM
mjkvol, on 20 January 2013 - 09:30 AM, said:
I agree - it matters much less what the specific scheme is than the idea of doing whatever is necessary to get stops, and fitting the system to the talent on hand. I'd personally love to see an approach that is a hybrid 3-4/4-3 depending on situations, kind of like the Ravens use. or something like Carroll's 4-3 Under scheme, but right now the secondary isn't close to being the type necessary. Had we taken Earl Thomas, and then drafted Milliner this year, we'd be half way to the kind of big, physical secondary needed for that.
Whatever it is, just make it physical and nasty. On that note, it is imperative that the Linc becomes a place teams fear coming into - we'll never see anything like the Vet again (unfortunately), but maybe Chip can develop something close to that. I wish the Linc had never been built, and we still played at that old dump - what an awesome home advantage.
But, then Lurie would have a few less sheckles in his bank account. Oh well.
However...clearly the defense needs a major overhaul and maybe it would be for the best. I guess we will find out soon enough.
#28
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:08 PM
CT Eagle, on 20 January 2013 - 11:22 AM, said:
However...clearly the defense needs a major overhaul and maybe it would be for the best. I guess we will find out soon enough.
You know, I don't think it matters much the first year - this will be more a year of sorting out what we have and establishing the new system. I would expect some early struggles, but would hope to see a strong finish as the players buy into the system and Kelly begins to weed out those who don't or can't.
2014 is the year to target.
#29
Posted 20 January 2013 - 02:47 PM
PoconoDon, on 20 January 2013 - 08:38 AM, said:
#30
Posted 24 January 2013 - 05:28 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











