#1
Posted 18 January 2013 - 06:34 PM
vs
NFC
#2
Posted 27 January 2013 - 07:02 PM
#3
Posted 27 January 2013 - 07:03 PM
#5
Posted 27 January 2013 - 07:37 PM
VaBeach_Eagle, on 27 January 2013 - 07:02 PM, said:
#6
Posted 27 January 2013 - 08:19 PM
#7
Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:05 PM
#8
Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:11 PM
#9
Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:17 PM
#10
Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:20 PM
Made me miss the days when the eagles used to send at least a handful of guys to this game
#11
Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:23 PM
Those things are 10 times more entertaining than the Pro Bowl.
#12
Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:41 PM
#14
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:09 AM
#15
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:12 AM
NFC wins in 2013 so in 2014 the NFC Champs have the SB at home. Maybe guys would play a little harder.
#16
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:13 AM
Kolbfan4, on 28 January 2013 - 12:07 AM, said:
Would be much more entertaining if they did that like the NHL with the skills competition.
Plus a week of debate of which team is better would be exciting
You have the starting qb from each conference as the captains
#17
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:16 AM
Shocker54, on 28 January 2013 - 12:13 AM, said:
Plus a week of debate of which team is better would be exciting
You have the starting qb from each conference as the captains
#18
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:26 AM
Kolbfan4, on 28 January 2013 - 12:12 AM, said:
NFC wins in 2013 so in 2014 the NFC Champs have the SB at home. Maybe guys would play a little harder.
#19
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:55 AM
VaBeach_Eagle, on 28 January 2013 - 12:26 AM, said:
I do agree that some kind of value to the game has to be added if it's meant to be enjoyed. The only thing I can think of at the moment is altering draft positions. The first tie breaker for draft picks would be by conference.For example, the NFC wins, so the Eagles and Lions would be picking in front of the Raiders. The other possibility would be to have it effect only the playoff teams and have the winning conference from the Pro Bowl pick first rather than having the actual winner pick second. For example the, NFC wins the Pro Bowl and then the 49ers win the Super Bowl. The 49ers would pick 31st instead of 32nd. This does lead to the potential problem of the rich getting richer, but I don't think the difference would be great enough to cause too much of an issue as it is only one slot.
I still miss the QB Challenge, I looked forward to that every year for a while.
#20
Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:26 AM
zenclaybourne, on 28 January 2013 - 12:55 AM, said:
I do agree that some kind of value to the game has to be added if it's meant to be enjoyed. The only thing I can think of at the moment is altering draft positions. The first tie breaker for draft picks would be by conference.For example, the NFC wins, so the Eagles and Lions would be picking in front of the Raiders. The other possibility would be to have it effect only the playoff teams and have the winning conference from the Pro Bowl pick first rather than having the actual winner pick second. For example the, NFC wins the Pro Bowl and then the 49ers win the Super Bowl. The 49ers would pick 31st instead of 32nd. This does lead to the potential problem of the rich getting richer, but I don't think the difference would be great enough to cause too much of an issue as it is only one slot.
I still miss the QB Challenge, I looked forward to that every year for a while.
I kind of like this idea. And yeah, there should be something more at stake.
I think MLB's idea of tying in home advantage in the World Series is a little much, but it's the correct general idea - stake something on the outcome.
The Draft might indeed be a good place to start. And/or winner-take-all payout.
The bottom line is, and we've been through it again and again, is that football is just not a sport that's conducive to having an all-star game. So if there's going to in fact be one, they've got to dress it up somehow and make it mean something.
From what I watched last night - about a half - the game was at least better-played than last year's fiasco. The only thing I noticed last night that was kind of questionable was the pass rush effort, but nobody wants to really nail the quarterback evidently. It wasn't a true NFL game, but it was a reasonable representation of one, I guess.
#21
Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:09 AM
#22
Posted 28 January 2013 - 10:15 AM
#23
Posted 28 January 2013 - 10:43 AM
What are your thoughts about that?
#24
Posted 28 January 2013 - 10:58 AM
bumpy93, on 28 January 2013 - 10:43 AM, said:
What are your thoughts about that?
#25
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:06 PM
bumpy93, on 28 January 2013 - 10:43 AM, said:
What are your thoughts about that?
#26
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:27 PM
bumpy93, on 28 January 2013 - 10:43 AM, said:
What are your thoughts about that?
I remember the 1979 Pro Bowl in L.A. It was the last of the Pro Bowls before the game was moved to Hawaii. The Coliseum was mostly empty (38,333 in attendance), and the game had a very apathetic feel to it. I still remember Wilbert Montgomery playing in that game.
#27
Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:34 PM
#29
Posted 29 January 2013 - 08:56 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: afc, nfc, hawaii
Eagles and Football →
Around the NFL →
"Saints" GM eavesdrops on opponentsStarted by Kolbfan4 , 23 Apr 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











