Pat Shurmur - An Interesting Pick, No?
#1
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:26 AM
Plus he has a ton of NFL experience including an intimate knowledge of the Eagles.
Good hire if true, Dave.
#2
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:37 AM
Kelly's most important hire by a wide margin is DC imo. Grantham and the Giants LB coach are the only two guys that I believe are currently being looked at (the Alabama DC said he wasn't interested).
I don't know how interested we were in Horton or the guy Seattle hired.
#3
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:38 AM
#4
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:38 AM
#5
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:46 AM
dmor, on 20 January 2013 - 11:38 AM, said:
I don't like the fact that Roseman and Shurmur have the same agent...
#6
Posted 20 January 2013 - 12:13 PM
#7
Posted 20 January 2013 - 12:16 PM
Rome, on 20 January 2013 - 11:26 AM, said:
Plus he has a ton of NFL experience including an intimate knowledge of the Eagles.
Good hire if true, Dave.
If you have looked at Kelly's track record is that his system is based on run first - Shurmer is not going to be his balance amazing how people think his system is pass happy it is not is based on fast paced play calling and alot of running
#8
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:02 PM
Runtherock, on 20 January 2013 - 12:13 PM, said:
I agree with you Runtherock... I think he will be hired to keep the yahoos out there from not freaking out that there is no NFL experience on the team.
He will be a puppet when it comes to running the offense... Kelly will be doing the play calling. The thing that will be crucial... hiring a DC... that will be very interesting.
#9
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:18 PM
bleed_eagle_green, on 20 January 2013 - 01:02 PM, said:
He will be a puppet when it comes to running the offense... Kelly will be doing the play calling. The thing that will be crucial... hiring a DC... that will be very interesting.
That's completely ridiculous.
If he's hiring a 'puppet' to do his bidding and is remotely concerned with what the 'yahoos' are saying, then we have a HC who is doomed to be an abject failure. I certainly hope that Kelly is a bit above idiocy like that.
Shurmur would not even be on my radar as far as ideal choices for OC - I don't see what he's done that's so special, and don't even know what his 'signature' is as far as scheme. To me, his stock was probably unjustly inflated from being associated with Reid, like everything associated with him. I sure as hell hope that doesn't have anything to do with his being brought in.
Having said that, I trust Kelly to do the right thing, and having a guy who's been an NFL HC and helped design pro offenses is far from the worst thing he could do there.
#10
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:27 PM
#11
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:31 PM
#12
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:33 PM
Rome, on 20 January 2013 - 01:31 PM, said:
his quarterback this year looked completely lost and he only squeezed 950 yards out of trent richardson. one game he only ran richardson 8 times (to be fair there's a possibility richardson was hurt that game).
#13
Posted 20 January 2013 - 02:48 PM
#14
Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:05 PM
dave moss, on 20 January 2013 - 01:33 PM, said:
...and they played for the Cleveland Fing Browns.
#15
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:31 PM
#17
Posted 20 January 2013 - 05:01 PM
#18
Posted 20 January 2013 - 05:18 PM
KOJO, on 20 January 2013 - 05:01 PM, said:
then why even give him the title OC? shurmur did not have an OC his first year in cleveland. (the second year he had brad childress)
#19
Posted 20 January 2013 - 05:26 PM
dave moss, on 20 January 2013 - 05:18 PM, said:
The title is irrelevant. I look a the Shurmur hire as being someone who with NFL experience who will assist Kelly as he transitions to the pro level. He wont call plays etc as the offense will essentially be Kellys. A safe, conservative choice.
Ohio
#20
Posted 20 January 2013 - 06:32 PM
#21
Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:45 PM
dave moss, on 20 January 2013 - 05:00 PM, said:
interesting take...
except that wasn't my take. The point is that you referenced the ineptitude of Shurmur's offense with the Cleveland Browns while ignoring the ineptitude with which the organization is run and the complete and total lack of talent the offense actually has.
#22
Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:56 PM
PS: Go Baltimore.
#23
Posted 20 January 2013 - 10:23 PM
Highboy, on 20 January 2013 - 08:45 PM, said:
well, personally I think Trent Richardson is pretty good. I understand he was injured this year, though, so it's hard to gauge how much that was a factor in the playcalling.
#24
Posted 21 January 2013 - 04:33 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











