Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Ray's Replies: Why so critical of Chip Kelly?

ray didinger csnphilly

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
14 replies to this topic

#1 herbicide

herbicide

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,782 posts
  • Location:Philadelphia
  • Team:Eagles
  • Fan Since:1960

Posted 21 January 2013 - 09:34 PM

Didinger

Ray's Replies: Why so critical of Chip Kelly?

January 21, 2013, 9:04 am

Posted Image




Q. Why are you so pessimistic about Chip Kelly? I saw you on Comcast SportsNet last week and I heard you on WIP Saturday, and you made it sound like Kelly was a terrible hire for the Eagles. Why so negative?

-Harry W.
Warminster, Pa.

A. I received a number of e-mails saying the same thing – that I was writing off the Chip Kelly hire as a foolish move that is doomed to failure. Just to set the record straight, I said no such thing.

I did say I was skeptical, which only means I have some doubts. Other analysts, such as Heath Evans of NFL.com and my old friend John Clayton at ESPN were far more critical of the hire. John used the term “disaster” in projecting Kelly as an NFL coach. I did not say anything close to that.

What I said, basically, is let’s wait and see. I know that’s an unsatisfying answer in an age of media punditry where opinions are expected to be immediate and absolute, but it is best I can do. It isn’t meant to be negative.

My biggest concern with Kelly is his lack of NFL experience. It is a huge factor and it cannot be dismissed. It doesn’t mean Kelly can’t overcome it and be successful, but it is an issue. Look at the history of coaches who tried to make the same leap. See how many crashed and burned.

Marc Garber, a frequent e-mailer from Marietta, Ga., was kind enough to research all the head coaches who were hired with no pro experience since 1970. Kelly is the 15th coach to try it. Of the previous 14, only two won a Super Bowl and they are Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer, who rode Johnson’s coattails in Dallas.

The others could be divided into the following categories:

Successful – Don Coryell (St. Louis, San Diego).

Somewhat successful – John Ralston (Denver), Chuck Fairbanks (New England), John McKay (Tampa Bay, made it to an NFC title game).

Unsuccessful – Dan Devine (Green Bay), Tommy Prothro (Rams, Chargers), Bud Wilkinson (St. Louis Cardinals), Daryl Rodgers (Detroit), Dennis Erickson (Seattle, San Francisco).

Disasters – Bill Peterson (Houston, went 1-18), Lou Holtz (didn’t finish one season with the Jets), Bobby Petrino (didn’t finish one season in Atlanta).

You can toss in Steve Spurrier, who had pro playing experience but no pro coaching experience when he made the jump from the University of Florida, where he was the hottest coach in the land, to the Redskins, where he fizzled out in two seasons.

Every situation is different, and it is impossible to compare Chip Kelly to, say, Lou Holtz, but it would be naïve to pretend this history doesn’t matter.

Pro football is a different game. The athletes are older, wealthier and more independent. They are as likely to listen to their agent as their coach. In college, the coach is king. He runs everything. He calls every shot from practice times to the pre-game meal. The NFL is a billion-dollar business with more layers and more people to answer to.

Some coaches are smart enough and slick enough to adapt. Others never figure it out. Where Kelly fits, we don’t know just yet.

I have two concerns: One involves the frenetic tempo of his offense. I know that’s what has many people, including Jeff Lurie, excited. But to play at that pace on Sunday, a team must practice at that pace during the week. It isn’t that hard to do in college with more than 100 players including scout teamers who will run reps forever. But it is more of a challenge in the NFL, where you have half as many players, many of whom are older and more battered and may be unavailable for days at a time.

That is why it is critical that Kelly hire assistant coaches with pro experience, guys who understand the rhythms of an NFL season as well as the restrictions put in place by the players union regarding practices, training camp, contact drills, etc. Kelly needs time to build his team but that time will be dictated, in part, by things beyond his control. He is not in Oregon anymore.

The other concern is his level of commitment. Kelly has been a college coach. He has enjoyed enormous success and made a lot of money as a college coach. He knows he can thrive there. For him, pro football is a leap into the unknown. What happens if it doesn’t go well? How long will it be before he starts getting a wistful “take me back to campus” look in his eye?

Holtz and Petrino didn’t make it through one season before deciding pro football wasn’t for them. Spurrier gave it two years. The point is that they knew they could go back to college and pick up where they left off. The NFL would be just a footnote in their resume, a fling that didn’t work out. They landed on their feet. It was their franchises that took the fall.

In time, we’ll get a better read on Chip Kelly and we’ll have a better sense of whether this marriage will be a success. I’m not saying it can’t work. Jimmy Johnson proved it can work. Don Coryell, even though he never won a Super Bowl, proved it can work.

I’m just saying let’s wait and see.

E-mail Ray Didinger at viewfromthehall@comcast.net



#2 Procus

Procus

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,131 posts
  • Team:Eagles
  • Fan Since:Early 70's

Posted 21 January 2013 - 09:43 PM

Ray is a class guy and the undisputed guru of Eagles history. He has not, however, shown himself to be a good evaluator of talent or coaching abilities.

#3 EAGLES1EAGLES

EAGLES1EAGLES

    Backup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 360 posts
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 21 January 2013 - 10:56 PM

Ray is a class guy and the undisputed guru of Eagles history. He has not, however, shown himself to be a good evaluator of talent or coaching abilities.


You said a mouthful on that. I noticed no matter what the decision he comes out with some "skepticism" about almost every decision. How aout we just stop reading his articles because we have some "resolutions" or "skepticism" about them?

#4 VaBeach_Eagle

VaBeach_Eagle

    EMB Fossil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 54,611 posts
  • Location:Chesapeake, Va
  • Team:Eagles
  • Fan Since:1976

Posted 21 January 2013 - 11:44 PM

Ray is a class guy and the undisputed guru of Eagles history. He has not, however, shown himself to be a good evaluator of talent or coaching abilities.

He is. I've emailed him in the past about articles and the first time I did it, I didn't expect to hear back. To my surprise though he not only responded to my email, but responded to several in an email 'conversation' about whatever the topic was.

I've emailed people like that before, but he's the only one that actually responded and then engaged in a short discussion.

#5 pgcd3

pgcd3

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 35,045 posts
  • Location:Santa Monica, CA
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 22 January 2013 - 08:34 AM

Evaluating the failures of college coaches without comparing it to assistant coach hires doesn't really give any perspective

#6 E v 2.0

E v 2.0

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,712 posts
  • Location:Sin City
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 22 January 2013 - 07:34 PM

Typical Ray qualifying his dumb **** by bringing in other people that said dumb **** and making it the norm.

"Hey look, an idiot named Heath Evans who is an absolute moron said it was the worst hire ever so me saying dumb things I cant prove doesnt look nearly as bad!!"

Please.

Not saying I love the hire at all but this is just nonsense.

#7 InfiniteSeriesN

InfiniteSeriesN

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 37,047 posts
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 22 January 2013 - 08:48 PM

Evaluating the failures of college coaches without comparing it to assistant coach hires doesn't really give any perspective

you want perspective? well here you go: most HC hires don't work out.

so the odds are against chip.

#8 bobbyuk

bobbyuk

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,109 posts
  • Location:London, England
  • Team:Eagles
  • Fan Since:1968

Posted 23 January 2013 - 08:28 AM

He didn't mention the reason Spurrier wasn't successful was the fact that he wasn't willing to put in the time that pro coaching takes and he admitted that both when he took over and after he was fired/resigned. The article doesn't mention Vermeil, but I guess since he coached a couple of years with the Rams, he doesn't count.

#9 Flyin' Brian

Flyin' Brian

    Superstar

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,501 posts
  • Location:South Jersey
  • Team:Eagles
  • Fan Since:Birth

Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:28 AM

Ray is a class guy and the undisputed guru of Eagles history. He has not, however, shown himself to be a good evaluator of talent or coaching abilities.


I concur

#10 birdguy

birdguy

    Backup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 736 posts
  • Location:NYC
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:18 AM

Did Ray ever state who his preferred candidate was?

#11 Portyansky

Portyansky

    Superstar

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,808 posts
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:56 AM

TATE

#12 macgregor

macgregor

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,183 posts
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:20 PM

He is. I've emailed him in the past about articles and the first time I did it, I didn't expect to hear back. To my surprise though he not only responded to my email, but responded to several in an email 'conversation' about whatever the topic was.

I've emailed people like that before, but he's the only one that actually responded and then engaged in a short discussion.

Me too. He's awesome like that.

#13 Runtherock

Runtherock

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,919 posts
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:09 PM

More disappointed in Ray's defense of himself than anything else. I watched and listened to his interviews. He was scathing. Not just skeptical, not just "wait and see." He made it very clear that he saw this as a dumb hire and he did because of no NFL experience. Ray is losing touch with the game, its leaving him behind, and its sad to see. Anything that evidences change he resists and criticizes, whether its NFL rules (many I agree with him on btw), or offensive schemes. Too bad.

#14 Runtherock

Runtherock

    EMB Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,919 posts
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:12 PM

Did Ray ever state who his preferred candidate was?

At different times I heard him say Gruden and then Gus.

#15 appatight

appatight

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 13 posts
  • Team:Eagles

Posted 25 January 2013 - 03:57 PM

They seem to always go back to Spurrier when the subject of college coach going straight to the NFL for a head coaching position. I don't expect Kelly to turn the team around in one season. He's the head coach so he's going to scout some players that will work for his style of coaching. That is going to take a season or 2 and making the returning Eagles adjust to his coaching. After Kelly and the rest of the coaching staff get comfortable, I think Kelly will do a great job coaching NFL. Chip Kelly and Steve Spurrier are 2 completely different people and coaches.