Steve Spagnuolo fired by Saints; they want to switch to 3-4
#1
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:39 PM
#3
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:42 PM
#4
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:46 PM
#5
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:46 PM
#7
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:46 PM
#8
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:46 PM
#9
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:48 PM
#11
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:50 PM
#12
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:52 PM
#13
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:54 PM
#15
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:55 PM
AceofSpades, on 24 January 2013 - 06:52 PM, said:
Right Payton is claiming it's because of a shift to the 3-4. Interesting that Payton sees the 3-4 as the way to go in today's nfl as well. If we did stick to the 4-3 then I'd consider Spags. Personally I'd rather have Spags run a 4-3 than Donatell though I'm sure others would argue otherwise.
#16
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:58 PM
pgcd3, on 24 January 2013 - 06:55 PM, said:
I'm kinda conflicted about Spags right now. We saw an impressive run and some close to dominant defensive performances from his unit back in 2007, got the Rams job in 2009 and that team had horrible defenses (had a lot to do with some personnel outside of Long & Laurinaitis). I'm honestly not sure how I feel. Spags does bring aggressive defense which is something Kelly wants. But I'm wondering if last year was a fluke or if the Saints just didn't buy into him as a coordinator. I don't know. I'd probably feel better about Spags over Donatell as well but at this stage, I don't know how to feel about Spags coming here. After what we've seen the Eagles do over the last 2 weeks, you really can't rule anything out.
#17
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:59 PM
Spags is a JJ disciple. The Eagles probably have some personnel scheme already in place to fit what Spags brings, as both Spags D and the current Eagles D are still molded more or less to JJ's specs. There is more than one way to do it successfully though. What's most important is that we have the talent and the execution.
#18
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:59 PM
Then again people here went nots for Nick Foles as well, and we all know he stunk it up.
#19
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:01 PM
AceofSpades, on 24 January 2013 - 06:58 PM, said:
I agree with that. I'm not sold on Spags given recent performances. Donatell is more of a sure thing in the middle I guess but that's exactly my problem with him. He's mediocre. I'd hope for a 3-4 guy who's well thought of if he's out there
#21
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:04 PM
#22
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:05 PM
macgregor, on 24 January 2013 - 06:59 PM, said:
Generally you wouldn't hear about the possibility of 2 linebackers coaches if they're sticking with a 4-3. I doubt 1 would just be given the Asst. LB Coach title. If Chip decides Spags is the guy to run his defense, fine that's his call.
#23
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:09 PM
#24
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:10 PM
#25
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:11 PM
#26
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:11 PM
#27
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:11 PM
AceofSpades, on 24 January 2013 - 07:05 PM, said:
I agree. I think they are going 3-4 or at least a hybrid
#29
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:15 PM
pgcd3, on 24 January 2013 - 07:11 PM, said:
I'd been calling for a hybrid for a couple years now. I want a defense that can go from 3-4 to 4-3 or vice versa like it's nothing. I want a defense similar to what Baltimore had been running for years. A defense that believes in the next man up philosophy (actually I want that for the whole team). If somebody goes down, the next man on the depth chart had better be able to do the job as well as the starter if not better or else it's time to find the next guy. Sure losing guys like Ray Lewis, Terrell Suggs, and others to injury hurts, but the next guy has to step in and do the job until the starter gets back.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











