[News] Pauline's Final Stock Report
#1
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:09 AM
View the full article
#2
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:16 AM
#3
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:27 AM
#4
Posted 26 January 2013 - 10:58 AM
#5
Posted 26 January 2013 - 12:02 PM
#6
Posted 26 January 2013 - 02:44 PM
#7
Posted 26 January 2013 - 02:59 PM
#8
Posted 26 January 2013 - 04:27 PM
mang1ra, on 26 January 2013 - 02:59 PM, said:
draft him later way later on see if hes still available no i think he's still a little faster we could use fast speed, he could get better with good coaching could be nasty good.
#9
Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:45 PM
More importantly, let's get S, OT, CB, and OLB. A big WR wouldn't be a bad pick either.
In the article, they talk about Jonathan Cyprien's stock being "up". After watching some film on him, I'd say his stock being up doesn't mean much as his body of work makes him look like another Kurt Coleman. And we could use fewer of those.....Make sure you get Matt Elam!
#10
Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:33 PM
#11
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:24 PM
I think Vick will be gone by early February. If you are truly revamping the team, Vick is not your guy. Also, Kelly has been on record praising Foles last year before the draft. I think (and hope) he will be the starter.
Would be nice if chip recognizes the need for consistency and takes a more conservative approach to QB than his college scheme but that's probably just wishful thinking
#12
Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:55 PM
Brodieman, on 26 January 2013 - 08:24 PM, said:
I think Vick will be gone by early February. If you are truly revamping the team, Vick is not your guy. Also, Kelly has been on record praising Foles last year before the draft. I think (and hope) he will be the starter.
Would be nice if chip recognizes the need for consistency and takes a more conservative approach to QB than his college scheme but that's probably just wishful thinking
i agree on that to, im just hoping for the best . but if they do get rid of vick i hope we can get something out of it.
matt is a pretty good safety but would he still be on the board thou.
#13
Posted 27 January 2013 - 01:03 AM
Brodieman687, on 26 January 2013 - 05:45 PM, said:
More importantly, let's get S, OT, CB, and OLB. A big WR wouldn't be a bad pick either.
In the article, they talk about Jonathan Cyprien's stock being "up". After watching some film on him, I'd say his stock being up doesn't mean much as his body of work makes him look like another Kurt Coleman. And we could use fewer of those.....Make sure you get Matt Elam!
#14
Posted 27 January 2013 - 01:07 AM
#15
Posted 27 January 2013 - 05:22 AM
#16
Posted 27 January 2013 - 09:09 AM
#17
Posted 27 January 2013 - 09:17 AM
#18
Posted 27 January 2013 - 10:26 AM
Regarding DT, I don't think that is nearly as urgent a need as S, CB, OT, OLB. I would be disappointed if we spent a pick on that, seeing as how we have a decent rotation there with Jenkins, cox, Thornton, Landri, Dixon, Patterson. I think that we could always use stud players but it is better to address the needs. If we still have the same secondary next year, the season is over.
Pace- between milliner and Elam I'd actually prefer Elam, but I understand that right now, his value is late 1st round and milliner is early first round. My scenario would be this: take milliner, trade up into late 1st round and get Elam if we think he won't be there beginning of round 2. We need both.
#19
Posted 27 January 2013 - 12:34 PM
#20
Posted 27 January 2013 - 06:56 PM
???????
#21
Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:42 AM
#22
Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:49 AM
#23
Posted 29 January 2013 - 12:51 AM
#24
Posted 31 January 2013 - 07:04 PM
#25
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:47 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











