VaBeach_Eagle, on 04 February 2013 - 03:22 PM, said:
Is that accurate? If so, then it's a no brainer to let the $3 Million "deadline" pass with no action.
That's 100% true. And with that scenario it seems like a better option than just releasing him before 2/6/2013 because we would take a cap hit. Assuming Vick is not in our plans (i hope not) I could see us trying to trade him. Vick will go somewhere and restructure......if someone signs him for 1.8 million then were still only on the hook for 1.2 million.....that doesn't seem all that bad considering the cap hit we would take for releasing him.













