A positive thing about switching to a 3-4
#1
Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:27 AM
#2
Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:33 AM
49ers, Cowboys, Patriots
#3
Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:35 AM
#4
Posted 31 January 2013 - 02:26 PM
Every team you listed didn't run a 3-4 scheme.
#6
Posted 31 January 2013 - 02:50 PM
Phila.:chip, on 31 January 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:
Every team you listed didn't run a 3-4 scheme.
That wasn't the point- point was that since the system relies on great LB play maybe we won't skimp
#7
Posted 31 January 2013 - 02:55 PM
3-4 requires great LBs
You can get away with lesser players at the other position but you can't completely ignore it which was the problem under Reid. You need at least one special player at the less important level. Of course more is better but 1 is probably bare minimum.
#8
Posted 31 January 2013 - 02:57 PM
WetFerret, on 31 January 2013 - 09:35 AM, said:
I am sure they will. Chip Kelley is a real coach. I am sure he will have all of his bases covered. I don't think we will ever hear him say "WE ARE FINE THERE" when they are clearly not.
#9
Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:12 PM
vic92353, on 31 January 2013 - 02:57 PM, said:
#10
Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:15 PM
vic92353, on 31 January 2013 - 02:57 PM, said:
Not hearing "we're fine there," "I have to do a better job," and "time's yours" will be one of the best things about this season for me.
#11
Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:17 PM
Gimpy, on 31 January 2013 - 03:15 PM, said:
For me it will be nice to see a coach of men that are in top physical condition not look like he's a cheesburger from a heart attack.
#12
Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:25 PM
#14
Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:54 PM
#15
Posted 31 January 2013 - 06:45 PM
paulyb384, on 31 January 2013 - 09:27 AM, said:
#16
Posted 01 February 2013 - 09:49 AM
paulyb384, on 31 January 2013 - 02:50 PM, said:
Also, the 3-4 doesn't rely on great linebacker play any more then the 4-3. Realize that with the 3-4, you have the less traditional linebacker types. The OLB are your edge rushers in the 3-4.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











