Quick mock draft
#1
Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:44 PM
1st pick: if millner is available scoop him immediatly if not then the pick is chance warmack G Alabama
2nd rd: matt elam S Florida
3rd rd: either justin hunter or de'rick Rogers both have the size we've been missing
4th: ej manuel qb Florida St very immpressed with his senior bowl performance lets hope he will last till the 4th
5th: Holmes C USC
6TH: Mike Maunti ILB PSU
7TH: Ray Ray Armstrong S formerly of the U. In the 7th round u take a risk on a kid that is one hell of an athlete. Low risk high reward pick ex Bryce Brown
FA: J. Byrd or D Gholson S: we need to get one of the 2 our safety play was horrible.
A Smith T: kid is coming into prime amd wont be over paid
Maybe pick up an outside LB if we can get one for a decent price to help switch to the 3-4.
Cut Nnamdi, paid way to much for his terrible performance the past 2 years
Rest of the cuts are the same as everybody else
I would like to see us re-sign DRC if the price isnt ungodly.. kid is a freak of an athlete just needs somebody to light a fire under his a**..
2014 draft o-line seeing that Peters, Todd, and Kathis arent getting any younger..
Thanks for reading and let me know what you guys think!!
#2
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:09 PM
So what you're saying is we trade this:
Round 1, Pick 4
Michael Vick
Danny Watkins
For...
Round 1, Pick 9
Darrell Revis
(2014) Round 1, Pick 1 (this is what it will be if they go through with this)
and a conditional 4th rounder
You must be really good at Madden to pull this off...
#3
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:11 PM
#4
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:16 PM
#5
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:21 PM
#6
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:22 PM
RUEagle, on 31 January 2013 - 10:16 PM, said:
Not to mention that either way you go at #9, you still end up with one to many starters. Go with Milliner, you have Revis, DRC, and him at CB. Go with Warmack, you have Peters, Mathis, Kelce, Warmack, Herremans, and (Andre) Smith.
#7
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:29 PM
natethegreat527, on 31 January 2013 - 10:21 PM, said:
If you look at it like 3 1st round selections for 3 1st round selections it may sound legit, but considering that Vick is barely able to start anymore it seems and you called Danny Watkins "Danny Worthless" (which is a great nickname), it doesn't really seem like they're getting any solid starters except for the pass rusher they'd grab at #4. Meanwhile, the Eagles get Revis, and two first round selections.
So take out the 2014 1st rounder and make the 4th conditional if Vick and Watkins are starter, and you have a more legit trade, but the Jets would have to be really into Watkins for the trade to still get pulled off.
#8
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:35 PM
#9
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:40 PM
EaglesCB37, on 31 January 2013 - 10:22 PM, said:
Not to mention that either way you go at #9, you still end up with one to many starters. Go with Milliner, you have Revis, DRC, and him at CB. Go with Warmack, you have Peters, Mathis, Kelce, Warmack, Herremans, and (Andre) Smith.
As we saw last year the better the depth the better we are overall... Whats to say we get the o-line as mentioned and then we go into training camp to see what they are made of or whats to say that Peters or Herrmann come into this year not 100% we still have options. Pls as I mentioned the three are all over 30 and are on the downslide of their careers
#10
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:42 PM
#11
Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:05 PM
EaglesCB37, on 31 January 2013 - 10:09 PM, said:
So what you're saying is we trade this:
Round 1, Pick 4
Michael Vick
Danny Watkins
For...
Round 1, Pick 9
Darrell Revis
(2014) Round 1, Pick 1 (this is what it will be if they go through with this)
and a conditional 4th rounder
You must be really good at Madden to pull this off...
#12
Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:17 PM
Justin Hunter is a first so no way he'll get to the 3rd
Rogers more likely a 2nd but its a possibility at 3rd i guess
the trade with the jets is rediculous 2 firsts and revis for a 1st, vick and watkins?
revis on his own could be worth a 1st so youre saying that vick is worth a 1st and watkins is worth a first... which neither are true
#13
Posted 01 February 2013 - 08:19 AM
natethegreat527, on 31 January 2013 - 10:42 PM, said:
Okay, slow down. I highly doubt DRC would be willing to take a safety's salary and he is much more fit to play cornerback. If you can find a way to add Milliner, Revis, Byrd, and Elam then by all means get rid of DRC. We'll need the cap money and we learned what happens when you put him in the slot. We already have Boykin, so say by a miracle the Eagles do get all those guys, then we can focus on finding a SAM and DT.
#14
Posted 01 February 2013 - 08:29 AM
#15
Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:00 AM
Vick maxes out at a 3rd round pick, and that's for the most desperate team possible.
So Eagles get the best CB in the NFL and two first round picks for a 1st, Vick(3rd) and Watkins(7th)?
Basically you're telling me that Revis is so worthless that the jets are willing to package two first round picks to move up a few spots in the draft, and for a POSSIBLE starting QB for MAYBE 10 games?
Worst trade I've ever seen taken seriously by a mocker.
If this trade had a value chart:
Eagles give 2,247 points to the Jets
Jets give 2,500 in draft picks, Revis (let's say 1st round maybe top 10, which is another 1300
So.
Eagles get 3800 points and "maybe a 4th"
And only give up 2247? Fair huh.
I quit reading after that trade was actual effort from you.
#16
Posted 01 February 2013 - 03:14 PM
Quote
stopped reading after this..
#17
Posted 02 February 2013 - 03:19 AM
With the whole points systems teams dont loom at that ex carson Palmer for 2 firrst rounders, if someone were to mock that they wouldhave gotten ripped apart and everyone would have said "STOPED READING AFTER"
And plus did anyone see how much the Redskins gave up last year to move up what 4-5 picks??
#18
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:36 AM
natethegreat527, on 02 February 2013 - 03:19 AM, said:
With the whole points systems teams dont loom at that ex carson Palmer for 2 firrst rounders, if someone were to mock that they wouldhave gotten ripped apart and everyone would have said "STOPED READING AFTER"
And plus did anyone see how much the Redskins gave up last year to move up what 4-5 picks??
its very easy to make a realistic mock.... just watch
1 Moore DE
2 Poyer CB
3 Amerson CB
4 Cyprien S
5 Geathers NT
6 Mauti ILB
7 Mills OL
^did that in 1 minute so its not hard... is it perfect/? no, but it was made in only 1 min... so you put the slightest bit more effort and it would be better
you are right about 1 thing though.... some players could get overvalued (palmer) , or are worth way more then normal (RG3).... but you are not only overvaluing Vick AND Watkins... youre undervaluing Revis
#19
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:39 AM
#20
Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:02 AM
#21
Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:16 AM
#22
Posted 04 February 2013 - 02:46 PM
natethegreat527, on 04 February 2013 - 07:02 AM, said:
you picked players at spots they would never get too
#23
Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:18 PM
natethegreat527, on 04 February 2013 - 07:02 AM, said:
Look, if you want Revis, forget the Jets giving us any picks, put in our 1st rounders for this and next year, and add Vick. Then maybe you have a deal.
#24
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:02 AM
natethegreat527, on 02 February 2013 - 03:19 AM, said:
With the whole points systems teams dont loom at that ex carson Palmer for 2 firrst rounders, if someone were to mock that they wouldhave gotten ripped apart and everyone would have said "STOPED READING AFTER"
And plus did anyone see how much the Redskins gave up last year to move up what 4-5 picks??
I still don't think you understand.
Redskins moved up for one of two of the best Rookie QBs in recent years. Andrew Lucks and RGIII don't come around often. You get a player to build your franchise through for 10-15 season, you'll trade those picks.
The Carson Palmer trade lets get a few things straight. raiders always get robbed, and Carson was a pro bowl, starting QB that wanted out. Vick is not even close to as valuable as Carson Palmer was.
Oakland felt Carson would be the spark to win then games. And be a franchise QB that they've lacked.
#25
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:19 AM
GoEagles614, on 05 February 2013 - 11:02 AM, said:
Redskins moved up for one of two of the best Rookie QBs in recent years. Andrew Lucks and RGIII don't come around often. You get a player to build your franchise through for 10-15 season, you'll trade those picks.
The Carson Palmer trade lets get a few things straight. raiders always get robbed, and Carson was a pro bowl, starting QB that wanted out. Vick is not even close to as valuable as Carson Palmer was.
Oakland felt Carson would be the spark to win then games. And be a franchise QB that they've lacked.
Perfectly stated. Remember when the Saints gave up all 6 picks they had in 1999, plus their 1st and 3rd in 2000 to move up from #12 to #5 for Ricky Williams? Just because a crazy, lop-sided trade happened that one time doesn't mean it will ever happen again.
@OP - You can't take it so personally. You said yourself it was a quick draft, so clearly you didn't think some things through... and got ripped for it. Remember, it's the internet. Just take whatever constructive things you can from their criticism, and try to apply that to your next attempt.
As for your draft - it's OK. A few of the players are taken later than they are projected to go, (especially Hunter), but you addressed the Eagles positions of need for the most part.
#26
Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:29 PM
#27
Posted 11 March 2013 - 02:47 AM
EaglesCB37, on 04 February 2013 - 03:18 PM, said:
,
Look, if you want Revis, forget the Jets giving us any picks, put in our 1st rounders for this and next year, and add Vick. Then maybe you have a deal.
Hows that Revis trade looking now? Hmm wasnt far off especially the reports that are saying a package deal with this years 3rd rd may land him.. substitute Foles for Vick and it may happen
#28
Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:24 AM
natethegreat527, on 11 March 2013 - 02:47 AM, said:
Are you saying the Jets would give us Revis for Foles and our 3rd round pick?
#29
Posted 13 March 2013 - 02:07 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











