Warren Sapp gets voted in, Strahan gets snubbed. I call BS
#1
Posted 03 February 2013 - 04:45 AM
#2
Posted 03 February 2013 - 05:42 AM
#3
Posted 03 February 2013 - 06:59 AM
pencil face, on 03 February 2013 - 05:42 AM, said:
Sapp was a gap shooter who got ridiculed on these forums his entire career for being an over rated blowhard. It wouldn't bother me if someone like Tim Brown got in over Strahan, but friggen Warren Sapp..... bull****.
#4
Posted 03 February 2013 - 07:24 AM
#5
Posted 03 February 2013 - 07:36 AM
Happyfoosball, on 03 February 2013 - 04:45 AM, said:
Read the newspaper sometime. This isn't a tragedy, Foos
Its a JOKE, but not tragic. He'll get in next year
#6
Posted 03 February 2013 - 08:49 AM
#7
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:46 AM
#8
Posted 03 February 2013 - 10:46 AM
Happyfoosball, on 03 February 2013 - 04:45 AM, said:
Hi, you really think a "gap tooth" day time talk show host belongs in the HOF
Lewis is 10 times the player he is.
Gmen4ever, on 03 February 2013 - 07:36 AM, said:
Its a JOKE, but not tragic. He'll get in next year
Hi, you're a dreamer.
#9
Posted 03 February 2013 - 11:40 AM
#10
Posted 03 February 2013 - 05:58 PM
#12
Posted 03 February 2013 - 06:46 PM
No big whoop...both will get in.
#14
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:17 PM
#15
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:59 PM
Froggy, on 03 February 2013 - 11:40 AM, said:
Strahan is a pretty compelling first ballot guy. So many of todays DE's are gap shooters who don't play the run that well, Strahan was classic, he initiated contact, checked for the running back then went after the QB. Played the run as well as the pass and retired top 5 all time in sacks I believe. Manged to get 60-80 tackles each year despite being double and trippled on every play.
#16
Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:34 AM
TheSilence, on 03 February 2013 - 09:17 PM, said:
NO!!!!!!!!!!
This is suppose to be an elite club of special players. Any more would just water down the meaning it holds to be in the HoF. If anything I believe there are some years where less people should get in.
This is not a post about Strahan or Sapp.
#17
Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:28 AM
#18
Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:51 AM
#21
Posted 04 February 2013 - 10:25 AM
1. Individual performance in comparison to his contemporaries:
Unfortunately for Ole' Gap Tooth, his #'s just don't stack up when compared to the 2 (unanimous, no less), 1st ballot HOF DEs from his generation.
- R White (played 15 seasons), 1,111 tackles, 198 sacks, double digit sacks in 12 of 15 seasons.
- B Smith (first 15 seasons), 1,054 tackles, 171 sacks, double digit sacks in 12 of 15 seasons.
- Strahan, (played 15 seasons), 851 tackles, 141.5 sacks, double digit sacks in only 6 of 15 seasons.
2. Team Accomplishements:
While he did play in 2 SBs (going 1 - 1), jersey did finish at .500 or worse in 8 of his 15 seasons.
So while IMO he does deserve to eventually get in, he's wasn't 1st ballot worthy and the voters obviously agree.
#22
Posted 04 February 2013 - 10:39 AM
#23
Posted 04 February 2013 - 10:41 AM
Want some cheese with that whine?
#24
Posted 04 February 2013 - 10:52 AM
#25
Posted 04 February 2013 - 11:00 AM
Dirty 30 Sucks, on 04 February 2013 - 10:52 AM, said:
Larry Allen was the most dominate OG of his generation, Strahan was somewhere between (at best) 3rd to (at worst) 5th among his DE contemporaries depending where you slot DE/OLB Kevin Green (who was a HOF semi finalist the past 6 years but is not in) and DT/DE John Randle (who got in his 2nd year of eligibility).
#26
Posted 04 February 2013 - 11:01 AM
MightyJNC, on 04 February 2013 - 11:00 AM, said:
Larry Allen was the most dominate OG of his generation, Strahan was somewhere between (at best) 3rd to (at worst) 5th among his DE contemporaries depending where you slot DE/OLB Kevin Green (who was a HOF semi finalist the past 6 years but is not in) and DT/DE John Randle (who got in his 2nd year of eligibility).
no.
#28
Posted 04 February 2013 - 11:10 AM
MightyJNC, on 04 February 2013 - 11:05 AM, said:
Stick to slobbin ricky's knob pinhead because you're completely out of your league here.
you're the eagles version of happy foosball.
http://espn.go.com/n...rs/_/stat/sacks
he's in the top 5 all time in sacks and he has the single season record. there really isnt a debate except for the fact he's a giant. Also you compared him to "contemporaries" when Strahan predominantly played in the 2000s.
#29
Posted 04 February 2013 - 11:26 AM
Dirty 30 Sucks, on 04 February 2013 - 11:10 AM, said:
http://espn.go.com/n...rs/_/stat/sacks
he's in the top 5 all time in sacks and he has the single season record. there really isnt a debate except for the fact he's a giant. Also you compared him to "contemporaries" when Strahan predominantly played in the 2000s.
Yes, top 5 in sacks, 58.5 behind Smith total ( and 30 behind him in his 15 season) and 56.5 behind White who like Strahan played 15 years with the huge difference being that both of White and Smith posted double-digit sacks in 12 of 15 seasons (80%) while Strahan only did it in 6 of 15 (40%) and he also trails both Green and Randle in sacks as well.
He played from 93' - 2007 , that's 7 seasons in the 90's and 8 in the 200's "predominately in the 2000s" yeah OK
Smith played from 85' - 2003 meaning they were contemporaries (played at the exact same time) for 11 seasons 93' - 2003.
White played from 85' - 2000 meaning they were contemporaries (played at the exact same time) for 7 seasons 93' - 2003.
Like I said just stick to doing what you do best, and please buy a dictionary.
#30
Posted 04 February 2013 - 11:28 AM
MightyJNC, on 04 February 2013 - 11:26 AM, said:
He played from 93' - 2007 , that's 7 seasons in the 90's and 8 in the 200's "predominately in the 2000s" yeah OK
Smith played from 85' - 2003 meaning they were contemporaries (played at the exact same time) for 11 seasons 93' - 2003.
White played from 85' - 2000 meaning they were contemporaries (played at the exact same time) for 7 seasons 93' - 2003.
Like I said just stick to doing what you do best, and please buy a dictionary.
what you said is meaningless he's still top 5 in sacks.....
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











