[Spadaro] What Is Fair To Expect In 2013?
#91
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:50 AM
#92
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:58 AM
Bell was a move out of desperation, and once Peters went down in camp, it was too late. We needed a LT, and this was a plug and play manuever. I feel this move had plenty of Mudd & Reid's red ink all over it...seeing false "talent" in him. As far as the deal is concerned...it worked out ok...we cut him this year and will get Peters back this season, saving the cap room. He shouldn't have been paid a dime I'll agree, but at least we had exit strategy with Bell.
Watkins I'll blame Reid for that reach in the draft. The oldest player selected in the first round since the 1980's. (26 years old) Great selection there. We don't draft him without the input of Reid and his wanting him for some reason.
#93
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:06 AM
#94
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:21 AM
#95
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:44 AM
#96
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:50 AM
#97
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:55 AM
#98
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:55 AM
Another year of Vick... I think Wood just passed out LOL
#99
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:57 AM
ATV...Woody...Snowy...and CCL...the holy trinity.
#100
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:01 PM
Woody is getting record #3 ready for repeat...
#101
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:07 PM
This opens up some things. Now Vick and Foles can both be on the table for trades. Vick only having one year for other teams to worry about paying him and this gives the rest of the league the appearance that Foles is not what Kelly wants. It will be interesting to see what unfolds. I think both go to camp unless there is an overwhelming offer that comes before the draft. But I would think one gets traded before the season starts.
#102
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:07 PM
I guessing Vick lasts 4 games turning it over 5 times before sidelined by injury ......
#103
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:09 PM
I need to know how much this is costing us! Were we that afraid to let him go shop FA? Were we THAT scared that'd drive the price up for keeping him here for another year??? And if it did....why did anyone care??? This is a HUGE blunder!
#104
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:21 PM
makes Vick more tradeable if Chip decides Vick isn't working out and unable to run the system... but I think it a good idea for Chip to see Vick in action first hand in his system... all other film can't really tell him that
#105
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:50 PM
It makes 0 sense, if Kelly is "revamping" the team, for us to keep an old injury and turnover prone QB.
We should keep DRC. His difficulties in the slot don't mean he isn't a good #1 or #2 corner. He's had a good career until he came onto this team with a carousel of DC's with the worst safeties I've ever seen on the eagles playing over the top. If we address safety, he'll be fine.
Please trade Vick, nnamdi, and maybe desean. Let's beef up our D with real impact players with real character.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











