Take a step back for a second, guys
#1
Posted 20 February 2013 - 03:55 PM
Let's all take this a little less seriously. Take a deep breath before you post something. The thousands of pages of threads in this forum filled with bickering about Michael Vick is revolting. It's just a football team, guys. There's no need for personal attacks, and endlessly arguing over meaningless stats. Nick Foles is just a flat out better quarterback than Michael Vick. Once we all realize that, things will be a lot more manageable around here.
Anyone who doesn't see that is just a complete and total **** who knows nothing about football.
Hugs and Kisses,
bungalo71
#2
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:17 PM
#3
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:21 PM
#4
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:23 PM
#6
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:24 PM
bungalo71, on 20 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:
Let's all take this a little less seriously. Take a deep breath before you post something. The thousands of pages of threads in this forum filled with bickering about Michael Vick is revolting. It's just a football team, guys. There's no need for personal attacks, and endlessly arguing over meaningless stats. Nick Foles is just a flat out better quarterback than Michael Vick. Once we all realize that, things will be a lot more manageable around here.
Anyone who doesn't see that is just a complete and total **** who knows nothing about football.
Hugs and Kisses,
bungalo71
15 page thread minimum from one sentence.
#7
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:26 PM
Just wait for some of the usual clown brigade on either side of the debate to show up.
What's the over under before someone get's called a nutthugger?
Or the rest of those frauds start reading into stuff that doesn't need to be read into? I give it by the end of page 1. Definitely by page 2 that's a lock.
#8
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:31 PM
kmass88, on 20 February 2013 - 04:26 PM, said:
Just wait for some of the usual clown brigade on either side of the debate to show up.
What's the over under before someone get's called a nutthugger?
Or the rest of those frauds start reading into stuff that doesn't need to be read into? I give it by the end of page 1. Definitely by page 2 that's a lock.
Nut hugger.
#9
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:49 PM
why the disrespect for trent edwards!
#10
Posted 20 February 2013 - 05:25 PM
bungalo71, on 20 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:
Let's all take this a little less seriously. Take a deep breath before you post something. The thousands of pages of threads in this forum filled with bickering about Michael Vick is revolting. It's just a football team, guys. There's no need for personal attacks, and endlessly arguing over meaningless stats. Nick Foles is just a flat out better quarterback than Michael Vick. Once we all realize that, things will be a lot more manageable around here.
Anyone who doesn't see that is just a complete and total **** who knows nothing about football.
Hugs and Kisses,
bungalo71
Sometimes it's fun to egg on the skitzoids though. Like you might be doing when you start talking about Foles vs. Vick.....
#11
Posted 20 February 2013 - 05:27 PM
bungalo71, on 20 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:
Let's all take this a little less seriously. Take a deep breath before you post something. The thousands of pages of threads in this forum filled with bickering about Michael Vick is revolting. It's just a football team, guys. There's no need for personal attacks, and endlessly arguing over meaningless stats. Nick Foles is just a flat out better quarterback than Michael Vick. Once we all realize that, things will be a lot more manageable around here.
Anyone who doesn't see that is just a complete and total **** who knows nothing about football.
Hugs and Kisses,
bungalo71
And remember, let's take care of ourselves and each other.
#12
Posted 20 February 2013 - 05:47 PM
bungalo71, on 20 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:
Let's all take this a little less seriously. Take a deep breath before you post something. The thousands of pages of threads in this forum filled with bickering about Michael Vick is revolting. It's just a football team, guys. There's no need for personal attacks, and endlessly arguing over meaningless stats. Nick Foles is just a flat out better quarterback than Michael Vick. Once we all realize that, things will be a lot more manageable around here.
Anyone who doesn't see that is just a complete and total **** who knows nothing about football.
Hugs and Kisses,
bungalo71
#13
Posted 20 February 2013 - 05:58 PM
vic92353, on 20 February 2013 - 05:47 PM, said:
#16
Posted 20 February 2013 - 06:03 PM
vic92353, on 20 February 2013 - 05:47 PM, said:
#17
Posted 20 February 2013 - 06:14 PM
vic92353, on 20 February 2013 - 05:47 PM, said:
vic92353, on 20 February 2013 - 05:47 PM, said:
#19
Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:28 PM
#20
Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:58 PM
Hoagie, on 20 February 2013 - 07:28 PM, said:
are you still mad that kelly was picked and then they resigned vick?
i know you werent to keen on that idea toward the start of jan more then likely
#21
Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:20 PM
#22
Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:51 PM
iluvdaeagles, on 20 February 2013 - 07:58 PM, said:
i know you werent to keen on that idea toward the start of jan more then likely
Mad? Hardly... I try not to get mad over things that are not my control. It's usually a waste of time.
I'm indifferent about Vick. I respect his heart for the game, and I truly believe he wants to win in this league. But the problem is that it might be too little, too late for him. He's only had 1 full season as a starter in the 10+ years he's been in the league. He turns the ball over way too much (yes, we're including fumbles) and is way too injury-prone. Nothing would make me more happy than to see him bounce back and have a great year for the Eagles, I just don't see that happening at this point. But I'm not "mad" that Chip decided to re-sign him at all, actually. I would prefer that he stick around and that they have an open competition for QB. But I'd certainly like to see more out of Foles, because the jury is still out on him and I tend to believe he'll have a decent future in the NFL.
With that being said, whoever is behind center for the Eagles I will support. So if you're trying to troll me, or start another Vick/Foles argument, you're barking up the wrong tree buddy.
#23
Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:57 PM
Hoagie, on 20 February 2013 - 11:51 PM, said:
I'm indifferent about Vick. I respect his heart for the game, and I truly believe he wants to win in this league. But the problem is that it might be too little, too late for him. He's only had 1 full season as a starter in the 10+ years he's been in the league. He turns the ball over way too much (yes, we're including fumbles) and is way too injury-prone. Nothing would make me more happy than to see him bounce back and have a great year for the Eagles, I just don't see that happening at this point. But I'm not "mad" that Chip decided to re-sign him at all, actually. I would prefer that he stick around and that they have an open competition for QB. But I'd certainly like to see more out of Foles, because the jury is still out on him and I tend to believe he'll have a decent future in the NFL.
With that being said, whoever is behind center for the Eagles I will support. So if you're trying to troll me, or start another Vick/Foles argument, you're barking up the wrong tree buddy.
just remember you bring pretty unhappy of the idea of kelly and vick about 2 months ago....maybe it was just me tho
http://boards.philad...0#entry17172177
Hoagie, on 03 January 2013 - 09:32 PM, said:
ill bark wherever i want kid
#24
Posted 21 February 2013 - 02:29 AM
#25
Posted 21 February 2013 - 03:18 AM
bungalo71, on 20 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:
Let's all take this a little less seriously. Take a deep breath before you post something. The thousands of pages of threads in this forum filled with bickering about Michael Vick is revolting. It's just a football team, guys. There's no need for personal attacks, and endlessly arguing over meaningless stats. Nick Foles is just a flat out better quarterback than Michael Vick. Once we all realize that, things will be a lot more manageable around here.
Anyone who doesn't see that is just a complete and total **** who knows nothing about football.
Hugs and Kisses,
bungalo71
#27
Posted 21 February 2013 - 02:29 PM
#29
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:09 AM
#30
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:16 AM
bungalo71, on 20 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:
Let's all take this a little less seriously. Take a deep breath before you post something. The thousands of pages of threads in this forum filled with bickering about Michael Vick is revolting. It's just a football team, guys. There's no need for personal attacks, and endlessly arguing over meaningless stats. Nick Foles is just a flat out better quarterback than Michael Vick. Once we all realize that, things will be a lot more manageable around here.
Anyone who doesn't see that is just a complete and total **** who knows nothing about football.
Hugs and Kisses,
bungalo71
I see what you did there....
Oh and because I cant help it anymore.
LOOK GUYS ANOTHER NICK FOLES AND MICHAEL VICK THREAD.....
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











