Mosher: Chip looking to load up on TEs, eliminate FB
#1
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:25 PM
Chip wants a TE to be a huge part of the offense like it is in New England.
#2
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:29 PM
#3
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:29 PM
#4
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:30 PM
#5
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:34 PM
Yeah, those guys don't grow on trees, but neither do playmaking TE's. If that's what you want for your offense, that's the prototype to draft.
Sack that QB, on 22 February 2013 - 07:30 PM, said:
Apparently the Eagles initially wanted to draft Cook...remember that was the year they had serial trade downs? They got too cute, lost him, and settled for Cornelius Ingram later on.
#6
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:34 PM
#7
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:36 PM
#8
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:36 PM
#9
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:37 PM
#10
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:40 PM
Sack that QB, on 22 February 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:
He is looking to be tagged as a WR if the Titans try to use the franchise tag....don't think he will get that in a contract.
#11
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:41 PM
#12
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:45 PM
#13
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:47 PM
Birds have shown alot of interest.
#14
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:52 PM
#15
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:53 PM
#16
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:59 PM
#17
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:00 PM
#18
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:07 PM
InfiniteSeriesN, on 22 February 2013 - 07:59 PM, said:
What does that have to do with the direction that Chip wants to take the offense? Rebuilding is a multi-year deal. You're not going to fix every hole in the first off-season. If the TE's on the roster can't do what he wants his TE's to do, then it's just as much of a need as CB.
#19
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:09 PM
InfiniteSeriesN, on 22 February 2013 - 07:59 PM, said:
Cmon man.
Kelly wants down field blocking tes and tes who can split outside help with that.
Dynamic tes pose huge match up problems.
Rome wasn't built in a day.
#20
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:18 PM
#21
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:21 PM
#22
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:31 PM
#23
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:41 PM
#25
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:51 PM
Jermichael Finley GB $8.75 M 50 3.8 48.2 0.32
Vernon Davis SF $8.74 M 64 3.8 50.3 0.48
Jason Witten DAL $8.0 M 64 5.9 62.7 0.30
Heath Miller PIT $7.96 M 61 3.9 45.0 0.30
Everyone has an opinion on Jermichael Finley. There's no question that he's a supremely athletic, talented tight end, but there's also no question that he has not lived up to that potential. His status with the Packers appears very much undecided at this point as well, and many fans would be happy to see him go. I'll be up front with my opinion. Personally, I think his detractors focus too much on struggles from previous seasons and his off-the-field antics to see the value that he brings to the Packers on the field. I feel like every catch Finley makes is greeted with a sarcastic chorus of "Oh look, Finley actually caught a ball," which drives me crazy. In any case, I'm not here to discuss my opinion on the player, but rather try to look at the factors surrounding this polarizing figure and make an educated guess on whether or not he will be a Packer in 2013.
#26
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:53 PM
#27
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:53 PM
#28
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:54 PM
#29
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:57 PM
#30
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:58 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











