Is there a doubt in any ones mind that we are taking Star?
#1
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:31 PM
#2
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:34 PM
sodakeagle, on 25 February 2013 - 10:31 PM, said:
You must have missed the news.
#3
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:34 PM
#4
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:36 PM
#5
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:40 PM
#7
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:43 PM
#8
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:44 PM
sodakeagle, on 25 February 2013 - 10:43 PM, said:
http://espn.go.com/n...ion-work-monday
#9
Posted 25 February 2013 - 11:04 PM
#10
Posted 25 February 2013 - 11:08 PM
#11
#12
Posted 25 February 2013 - 11:32 PM
i would like to see them grab a guy later in the draft, a big 325lb range. that NT position is gonna be a dirty job gonna need somebody thats hungry and just willing to do whatever we ask of him hes gonna basically take on blockers and double teams all game. you dont really wanna spend a high draft pick on a position like that just need a hollis thomas type guy
#13
Posted 25 February 2013 - 11:40 PM
#14
Posted 25 February 2013 - 11:49 PM
greenpassion, on 25 February 2013 - 11:32 PM, said:
i would like to see them grab a guy later in the draft, a big 325lb range. that NT position is gonna be a dirty job gonna need somebody thats hungry and just willing to do whatever we ask of him hes gonna basically take on blockers and double teams all game. you dont really wanna spend a high draft pick on a position like that just need a hollis thomas type guy
landri is a FA and prob gone
#16
Posted 25 February 2013 - 11:58 PM
As far as Star L. goes, if it's a severe condition then no thanks. It's an unfortunate situation for him, but one that could potentially save his life too.
#18
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:05 AM
eagle8, on 25 February 2013 - 11:40 PM, said:
dont like. i never like these guys who jump all the way up at the last minute. plus i watched a good amount of oregon football this year and this dude never stood out that i can remember
the pick is the warmaster. im telling you if we dont get this guy we are gonna regret this for the next 20 years. anybody saying 4 is too high for him just because he plays gaurd is silly.
you mean to tell me a larry allen type of lineman isnt worth a 4? and believe me that comparison is not a stretch thats about as legit as can be
the consensus is chance is the best player in the draft but because he plays gaurd he cant be a top 5 pick
#19
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:07 AM
Really hope Star's medical stuff works out once they know more. No idea how seriously it is. He'd be a fantastic pick at #4.
#20
#21
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:20 AM
#23
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:24 AM
greenpassion, on 26 February 2013 - 12:05 AM, said:
the pick is the warmaster. im telling you if we dont get this guy we are gonna regret this for the next 20 years. anybody saying 4 is too high for him just because he plays gaurd is silly.
you mean to tell me a larry allen type of lineman isnt worth a 4? and believe me that comparison is not a stretch thats about as legit as can be
the consensus is chance is the best player in the draft but because he plays gaurd he cant be a top 5 pick
Jordan has been considered a top 10 pick since before the start of the season. His rise from the perception of top 10 to top 5 now has more to do with the other players having so many problems. Geno Smith is a mediocre QB prospect, Star has a heart problem, Jones has a spinal problem, Moore is a mediocre athlete... Jordan is the one guy who is as advertised.
As far as him not standing out - you have to understand how he was used. He wasn't a traditional DE or LB. He was used in coverage a lot. Like, literally, lining up in the slot against WRs. At 6'6" 240 pounds... In the age of huge athletic TEs, having a guy like Jordan couldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Oh, and as for Warmack... no thanks. He's no Shawn Andrews. He's not that type of talent. That's the problem - he's not a dancing bear, he's huge man, but he doesn't move well. In fact, I'd take Cooper over Warmack straight up. Much more athletic.
#24
Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:34 AM
#25
Posted 26 February 2013 - 01:12 AM
Matt101292, on 26 February 2013 - 12:34 AM, said:
#26
Posted 26 February 2013 - 01:22 AM
The Eagles win!, on 26 February 2013 - 12:24 AM, said:
Jordan has been considered a top 10 pick since before the start of the season. His rise from the perception of top 10 to top 5 now has more to do with the other players having so many problems. Geno Smith is a mediocre QB prospect, Star has a heart problem, Jones has a spinal problem, Moore is a mediocre athlete... Jordan is the one guy who is as advertised.
As far as him not standing out - you have to understand how he was used. He wasn't a traditional DE or LB. He was used in coverage a lot. Like, literally, lining up in the slot against WRs. At 6'6" 240 pounds... In the age of huge athletic TEs, having a guy like Jordan couldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Oh, and as for Warmack... no thanks. He's no Shawn Andrews. He's not that type of talent. That's the problem - he's not a dancing bear, he's huge man, but he doesn't move well. In fact, I'd take Cooper over Warmack straight up. Much more athletic.
#27
Posted 26 February 2013 - 01:54 AM
The Eagles win!, on 26 February 2013 - 12:24 AM, said:
As far as him not standing out - you have to understand how he was used. He wasn't a traditional DE or LB. He was used in coverage a lot. Like, literally, lining up in the slot against WRs. At 6'6" 240 pounds... In the age of huge athletic TEs, having a guy like Jordan couldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Oh, and as for Warmack... no thanks. He's no Shawn Andrews. He's not that type of talent. That's the problem - he's not a dancing bear, he's huge man, but he doesn't move well. In fact, I'd take Cooper over Warmack straight up. Much more athletic.
i think you need to re-evaluate your assesment of warmack because you have that all wrong. andrews was nowhere near as good as warmack and lol at him not having the athletics
#28
Posted 26 February 2013 - 02:23 AM
#29
Posted 26 February 2013 - 02:55 AM
#30
Posted 26 February 2013 - 03:13 AM
Sack that QB, on 26 February 2013 - 12:20 AM, said:
Right, they could go OT and draft a wide body to plug the center of the line in the later rounds. It all depends on what you expect from your NT.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











