OFFICIAL: Nick Foles 2017 option not picked up by Chiefs

[vincent_NJG 1,200]

28 minutes ago, cowboy_ron said:

I've seen a couple of mocks that have the giants taking Watson with their 1st rounder.

Me too. It wouldn't shock me one bit. 

[NE.Jon 2,663]

3 hours ago, vincent_NJG said:

Who says I'm bragging? I'm not

I was merely correcting and using it as an example to show that one inaccurate line doesn't negate an entire post.

Eli is past his prime and the Giants need to start searching for his replacement

 

clearly you are have trouble understanding what posters are saying . You do understand when someone says something is like vs something is ? 

[vincent_NJG 1,200]

13 minutes ago, NE.Jon said:

clearly you are have trouble understanding what posters are saying . You do understand when someone says something is like vs something is ? 

Oh my bad.

You're so right. ..

Me simply correcting your statement  is "like" Redskins fans bragging about 2015 or something....

....I think...

 

[NE.Jon 2,663]

3 minutes ago, vincent_NJG said:

Oh my bad.

You're so right. ..

Me simply correcting your statement  is "like" Redskins fans bragging about 2015 or something....

....I think...

 

 

Fing jersey people ....  

[vincent_NJG 1,200]

28 minutes ago, NE.Jon said:

Fing jersey people ....  

Yeah.... I live in the Eagle part though so.....

[20dawk4life 11,328]

He's gonna go to Denver and win a sb. 

[NE.Jon 2,663]

1 hour ago, vincent_NJG said:

Yeah.... I live in the Eagle part though so.....

Even Worse you get all the fumes Philadelphia blows over to infect SOuth Jerz 

[bwestbrook36 7,427]

SB Nation: Nick Foles could return to the Eagles in 2017. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIw3Ifmujk

 

Here play with this

[downundermike 17,475]

4 minutes ago, bwestbrook36 said:

SB Nation: Nick Foles could return to the Eagles in 2017. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIw3Ifmujk

[bwestbrook36 7,427]

52 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Apparently the rest of the league hasn't figured out he is elite haha

[vincent_NJG 1,200]

1 hour ago, NE.Jon said:

Even Worse you get all the fumes Philadelphia blows over to infect SOuth Jerz 

I'm on the shore though. All the fumes I inhale are 100% intentional

[NE.Jon 2,663]

18 hours ago, vincent_NJG said:

I'm on the shore though. All the fumes I inhale are 100% intentional

even worse .... the landfill Known as the Atlantic ocean    

[Alphagrand 2,577]

Personally I think Foles is an ideal #2 guy.  He's not good enough to push a good starting QB or create a QB controversy, but if your starter went down with injury and you had to put him in for 4-6 games your season isn't in the sewer either.

He'll be a #2 somewhere next season.

[skippyx 3,631]

Take anyone's best 10 games away from them, call them FLUKES, and they will look worse. (talk about stat manipulation )

The ONLY things not to like about Foles are that:

1) He was not instantly great as a rookie on a decimated team that got a HoF coach fired (1-5 record)

2) He could not turn around the worst franchise in the NFL since 2003 (Cleveland had a winning record in 2007) while facing 8 playoff teams in 11 games. (4-7 record)

Foles is 15-6 in every other start (this includes the half against Houston which was tied and does not include the KC - Colts game or the Philly - NY game which he clearly won) 16-6 is a more accurate representation for games he controlled.

If you damn him for 2014 you are an idiot. I will counter with Luck '15, Peyton '01, Elway '90 or '94, Ben '06, Marino '89 and '97, Eli '07(yes, the SB year), '10, '13, Ryan '15, Brees '03, . Good QBs will struggle depending on the 10 other players around them or them just not being perfect. Are those guys all low tier starters or high tier backups?

 

Stick with the logic that a QB that went 8-2 on a team that went 2-4 without him was given some unfair advantage. It makes you sound very smart. 

If you can research up some Foles/Keenum 2015 angle like 8/11 playoff teams vs 1/5 playoff teams and we will all listen. 

You can't do that because you think stats are for nerds and your crap opinion should count for something.

 

 

 

[vincent_NJG 1,200]

36 minutes ago, skippyx said:

Take anyone's best 10 games away from them, call them FLUKES, and they will look worse. (talk about stat manipulation )

 

 

 

 

*Sigh* 

Remember Michael Vick?

Remember all the arguing about him. He was mediocre for most of his career but when he stepped in for an injured Kevin Kolb, he blew the doors off.

The following season he went back to mediocre.

Vick lovers made up excuses at every turn and swore all up and down that the 10 game streak in 2010 was the real Vick 

The handful of Foles believers left are doing now the same as the Vick lovers did then.

I gave up trying to convince those regarding Vick and let them take their time realizing it.

I'm going to do the same with Foles. 

I've made my point clear. You can believe whatever you want. That being said, come this time next year, I'm going to fully expect you to come in with a whole new batch of stat ridden excuses for your boy.

[vincent_NJG 1,200]

3 hours ago, NE.Jon said:

even worse .... the landfill Known as the Atlantic ocean    

Damn. You got me there

[SBorBust 3,541]

Eagles Fan #1 - 30 TD and 2 INT for a season is pretty good.

Eagles Fan #2 - Yeah, but he took over for Michael Vick. He's not cool. F that guy.

[bwestbrook36 7,427]

Wonder what everyone will do when foles never sees the field again?

[zenclaybourne 4,005]

11 hours ago, bwestbrook36 said:

Wonder what everyone will do when foles never sees the field again?

I'd honestly be surprised as would most I would think. He may not ever be handed a starting job again but he has shown himself capable of playing well in relief. Most people seem to see him a low end starter and high end backup. Those guys end up playing. See Matt Cassel

[Jason1978 916]

On 3/4/2017 at 11:57 PM, bwestbrook36 said:

Wonder what everyone will do when foles never sees the field again?

The Titans and Bills are already said to be interested in him. Seriously if teams want Chase Daniel, Nick Foles will easily find a job somewhere as a backup.

Foles in one game in 2016: 

105.9 QB rating
65.5 comp %
3td, 0int
410 pass yards

Daniel in his entire 7 year career

81.1 QB rating
65.4 comp %
1td, 1int
480 pass yards

[bwestbrook36 7,427]

1 hour ago, Jason1978 said:

The Titans and Bills are already said to be interested in him. Seriously if teams want Chase Daniel, Nick Foles will easily find a job somewhere as a backup.

Foles in one game in 2016: 

105.9 QB rating
65.5 comp %
3td, 0int
410 pass yards

Daniel in his entire 7 year career

81.1 QB rating
65.4 comp %
1td, 1int
480 pass yards

I meant as a starter

[NIBGoldenchild 182]

2 hours ago, Jason1978 said:

The Titans and Bills are already said to be interested in him. Seriously if teams want Chase Daniel, Nick Foles will easily find a job somewhere as a backup.

Foles in one game in 2016: 

105.9 QB rating
65.5 comp %
3td, 0int
410 pass yards

Daniel in his entire 7 year career

81.1 QB rating
65.4 comp %
1td, 1int
480 pass yards

Those stats are from two games, not one game. 

- vs. Jacksonville - 20/33, 187 yards, 1 TD

- vs. Colts - 16/22, 223 yards, 2 TD

[zenclaybourne 4,005]

8 hours ago, NIBGoldenchild said:

Those stats are from two games, not one game. 

- vs. Jacksonville - 20/33, 187 yards, 1 TD

- vs. Colts - 16/22, 223 yards, 2 TD

A game and a half, one start

[Don Corleone 59,904]

 

[Excel 1,492]

Foles is better than Chase Daniels. He just is. I still wouldn't pay him very much. Draft a backup. This team isn't going to be contending for anything anyway .